North American
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Bengals-3.0 looks like a gift here based on previous games. Dolphins could turn it on maybe but Bengals have to be the play here surely
Show More
BENGALS HAVENT COVERED MORE THAN 3 POINTS IN ANY OF THEIR ROAD GAMES NOT SURE THEY WOULD TONIGHT EITHER
Yeah i agree Bengals all the way here, Bengals -2.5 for me i think
I had the Bengals a TD better before the right side of the Miami O line went sick.
This is one of those lines where you feel like you should bet the bank ... then you think, 'Hold on, what am I missing?'
I've no idea what I've overlooked, so it's the full £2.
This is one of those lines where you feel like you should bet the bank ... then you think, 'Hold on, what am I missing?'
I've no idea what I've overlooked, so it's the full £2.
I think the bungals are overrated. Miami solid at home and will be hard to bt imo.
im chasing tbh, im tempted to lump on bengals but not done yet, I never seem to do well on nfl
Dolphins have lost their last 4 overall, including their last 2 at home to Ravens & Bills, one as 2.5pt fav and one as a 6.0pt fav so don't see how you can call them solid at home
yes but not lost by more than 3 pts and with 3 points on the spread I think they will hold their own tonight.
yeah seems that way, hows about over 32.5 at 1.2? that
liam1982, if you don't mind me saying.....it's difficult (impossible actually) to do well, "lumping"
on anything, especially NFL. Practically all the teams are competitive.
My own view is that you are better securing a small profit on the game, and taking some of it and laying the first team to go sub 1.12 or so. Sit back and watch.
From these match threads - your approach seems to be "lump" on one team or another - fast track to the poor house.
1% return on your bank is more than ok.
on anything, especially NFL. Practically all the teams are competitive.My own view is that you are better securing a small profit on the game, and taking some of it and laying the first team to go sub 1.12 or so. Sit back and watch.
From these match threads - your approach seems to be "lump" on one team or another - fast track to the poor house.
1% return on your bank is more than ok.
No bet for me on this one, just cant be sure how it will go, may get involved running later or just watch the NHL if its boring
Fins can't run it, and they know they can't throw it against the Cincy pass D, time to take some Bengal @ 1.56. Too bad they missed the FG because 1.80 ish would have been even better. Going to green out if I get a chance for a 15% win.
Love low-scoring matches........hope it stays this way
Fins will have to throw it this series. Chance of on INT coming up.
Dolphins not built for chasing, they cant afford to go 2 scores behind.
Both teams poor enough so far - terrible miss from Fins kicker
For sure. Chasing = passing. Passing isn't their forte
5 misses from last 6 kicks, his leg must be like jelly everytime he tee's up now
Good luck with your bets guys. I got out @ 1.39. Chance to go to bed before sunrise for a change.
Nov 1, 2013 -- 2:11AM, Swardean wrote:
5 misses from last 6 kicks, his leg must be like jelly everytime he tee's up now
P45 ON ITS WAY
I agree with Swardean, I think the Bengals are jazzed up to the hilt.
who get the ball 2nd half (not that that is an advantage!!)
Yep, very harsh............. I'm enjoying this.....there is good defense on show here, at the line and in coverage
I'm with you wallflower, hate shootouts, love the 9-6 ones
Miami at 1.2 is too low ......have to lay a bit of that
Been impressed with Bernard every time I've seen him
...hard on them, that ridiculous penalty was a killer
are they actually gonna choke the match? or will they clutch it out?
.....nobody knows.......not like IPL or Tennis where some people actually do know
for some reason, i get the feeling the Dolphins are still gonna win this
wow. NFL always finds a new kind of weird.
Some real dimwits on the tennis forum who don't understand simple overtime rules. 
Honestly, know the rules of the sport before you take a punt on it!
You mean this guy?
Srichaphan or Ancic? • November 1, 2013 4:01 AM GMT
You are all clueless. Each team has an attempt to score in OT, and if neither score it is the first team to score who wins, if any team scores that is.
Srichaphan or Ancic? • November 1, 2013 4:13 AM GMT
that would have finished the game there too, as both teams had a chance to score. If Miami had got 6/7 pts on their drive at the start of OT, the game would not have finished until Cincinnati had had a chance to try and score.
when the rule clearly states
The system guarantees each team a possession or the opportunity to possess, unless the team that receives the opening kickoff scores a touchdown on its initial possession.
Srichaphan or Ancic? • November 1, 2013 4:01 AM GMT
You are all clueless. Each team has an attempt to score in OT, and if neither score it is the first team to score who wins, if any team scores that is.
Srichaphan or Ancic? • November 1, 2013 4:13 AM GMT
that would have finished the game there too, as both teams had a chance to score. If Miami had got 6/7 pts on their drive at the start of OT, the game would not have finished until Cincinnati had had a chance to try and score.
when the rule clearly states
The system guarantees each team a possession or the opportunity to possess, unless the team that receives the opening kickoff scores a touchdown on its initial possession.
Nov 1, 2013 -- 5:16AM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:
Some real dimwits on the tennis forum who don't understand simple overtime rules.
the really sad part is that he made that post here in this thread and called us dimwits for us not knowing the rule after he had been proven clearly wrong by us quoting the freaking rule to him. Doesn't get much more factual and clear than quoting a rule, does it?
was there a 1.01 gubbing in the points market?
there was a 42.5 market i think but I am not sure anymore and the probability of a safety is very small.
there was a 42.5 market i think but I am not sure anymore and the probability of a safety is very small.
the funny think is that both teams could be in the playoffs.
the scary thing is that every week a big star seems to tear his ACL.
Nov 1, 2013 -- 5:16AM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:
Some real dimwits on the tennis forum who don't understand simple overtime rules.
LOL THATS A BIT HARSH.
Well, I saw that coming
A friend of mine in the US suggested 'I'll love the game' ... so I'm not going to watch Dalton throw only his second career pick in the redzone, or the second game in nfl history to end in a safety
I've turned the heating off until January.
A friend of mine in the US suggested 'I'll love the game' ... so I'm not going to watch Dalton throw only his second career pick in the redzone, or the second game in nfl history to end in a safety
I've turned the heating off until January.
Never trust a ging!
Jesus Christ, 4 TO's, and he was missing wide open WR's all night and throwing into coverage instead. He is who I thought he was, and so are the Bungles. They'll get steamrollered when it matters.
Back to trading NFL methinks. So much easier as the games go back and forth all night long.
Cincy play calling down the stretch was awful, the Ellis runs up the gut on 1st down were getting stuffed every time, then backed up at the 8 the ging starts throwing hail mary's...
I feel sorry for the folks on overs who needed 43, they must have been rubbing their hands @ 20-20.
Jesus Christ, 4 TO's, and he was missing wide open WR's all night and throwing into coverage instead. He is who I thought he was, and so are the Bungles. They'll get steamrollered when it matters.
Back to trading NFL methinks. So much easier as the games go back and forth all night long.
Cincy play calling down the stretch was awful, the Ellis runs up the gut on 1st down were getting stuffed every time, then backed up at the 8 the ging starts throwing hail mary's...
I feel sorry for the folks on overs who needed 43, they must have been rubbing their hands @ 20-20.
Well, having watched it, Miami played well on defense, but a couple of ropey throws, inexcusable drops and a bonehead hold cost the Bengals badly.
It was encouraging to see Cameron Wake and Mike Williams finally come to the party, and Miller looked great, but that O line is horrible; Cincinnati losing Geno Atkins may have saved Tannehill's life lol but he has the stuff.
Them's the breaks, I lost a bagful on the wrong pick.
It was encouraging to see Cameron Wake and Mike Williams finally come to the party, and Miller looked great, but that O line is horrible; Cincinnati losing Geno Atkins may have saved Tannehill's life lol but he has the stuff.
Them's the breaks, I lost a bagful on the wrong pick.
It would be boring if you won all the time Orioles. 
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539