|
By:
Bet of the weekend for me
|
|
By:
IMO it's not the slam dunk it looks like, especially to Clay. San D can be a very good team, who knows if this is one of the weeks. Can't stand Rivers, but he can be toilet bowl one week, super bowl caliber the next. Indy beat a good Seattle team last week at home, but that was the second road game in a row for Seattle, the week before they just won over what now looks like a bad Houston team Seattle , IMO, not as good as they're hyped up to be, especially on the road, so I'm not putting much weight on Indy's "big" win last week.
Yes, Indy did smack SF, but that' looks like it wasn't the greatness it looked like it should be. Indy won 4: , Oakland, Jax, SF, Seattle. Lost to Miami. 4-1 looks impressive, but their schedule is soft. PLus, a big plaus, do you think they're looking forward to something next week ? San Diego looks like crap, but throw out last week at Oakland, always a tough divisional game. But, the absolute , positive, flashing light sign that this game is no walkover for Indy is take a look at the line. A hot media darling 4 - 1 team going against what most people think are a bunch of 2 and 3 stooges, and the stooges are only +2. The line maker knows more than you ( maybe not you, but for sure he knows more then me ) Why only +2 ? It looks like it should be way more, yet, it's not. Respect the very low pointspread. Like always, what do I know ? Indy may blow them out. A fumble here, an INT there, and it's all over. I'm just saying, tread lightly. Just one guy's opinion. |
|
By:
beating 49ers and Seattle soft?
2 of the best teams in NFL ![]() the Miami game was a fluke by Miami. they were dominated throughout that game and their luck has run out now. |
|
By:
Seattle , IMO, only 75% as good as they're hyped up to be. Don't know what happened to SF when they played Indy, they were coming off a spanking from Seattle. Playing 3 of the lesser teams in the first 5 weeks, one good team ( SF) and one hyped up darling who still can't get it together consistently on the road is a soft schedule.
Miami fluke win over Indy ? Miami held tough in the 4th, Tannenhill was just as good as Luck. Miami beat them clearly. No domination by anyone. |
|
By:
you may need to check the stats on that one:
Colts had more 1st downs, had more yards, same turnovers and more time with the ball Luck just made a couple of bad throws but hasn't since you could argue that the Chargers have had a soft schedule - they haven;t played a team with a winning record yet and are 2-3 just opinions though ![]() |
|
By:
SHOULD BE A DECENT GAME
|
|
By:
You're right on everything there D13. Those are offensive stats. Why is that domination, because obviously they were stopped from winning big by either poor finishing by Indy, or good defending by Miami. What good is domination if you can't finish ?
All my writing on this game is indeed just opinion. The truth, to me, is always the point spread. I try to figure out why it is what it is. Indy -2. Why so low ? Anyway, good luck with your bet tonight if you have one. I usually only bet in play, so we might both win. |
|
By:
Just went to check the stats on that Indy Miami game. I watched the game in it's entirety so I thought I knew what I was talking about, and didn't feel a need to look it up.
1st downs. Miami 21, Indy 23 Total yards Miami 398 Indy 448 Time of possession Miami 29:26 Indy 30:34 Hardly domination. The only glaring INDY stat I could see is punting average. Miami 42 yds, Indy 52 sacks were 5-2 Indy, but Indy lost because they were only 2 for 4 in the red zone, Miami was 3 for 3 Fins won that game fair and square. |
|
By:
Strongly suggest backing a shoot out in this game gotta be over 50 points and Indy winning late.
![]() |
|
By:
Still Standing talks a lot of sense in my opinion. A no bet game for me as you just don't know which San Diego will turn up. It is interesting that the Chargers are only +2 as on the face of it I would have expected something more like a +5 or +6 spread given recent performances but the line maker has been doing it a lot longer than me...
|
|
By:
Impossible game for me, on the one hand I dont think the Colts are as good as their record, on the other I can never back with the chargers with any confidence.
If I was forced to have a bet I guess it would chargers M/L. A good weekend for me with all my SB teams winning (seattle, caroline, new england). GL anyone playing. |
|
By:
Impossible game for me, on the one hand I dont think the Colts are as good as their record, on the other I can never back with the chargers with any confidence.
If I was forced to have a bet I guess it would chargers M/L. A good weekend for me with all my SB teams winning (seattle, caroline, new england). GL anyone playing. |
|
By:
I genuinely believe, assuming most stay healthy, that the Colts will contest the AFC Championship game.
With Houston is meltdown this is a big game for the Colts - oould really pull away from them |
|
By:
I'm all over Indy tonight, have been for a while. You cannot knock their showing so far this season. IMO they have been 2nd only to Denver this season.
|
|
By:
SD will be a lay when they lead by about 17
![]() |
|
By:
i like the colts here 10/11 yes plz .
|
|
By:
I like San Diego, but worth waiting to see.
|
|
By:
10 year home record, SD 67%
10 year road record, Ind 63% This is going to be a tight match. |
|
By:
and yes I know Manning isnt there now, but theyre still tough to beat.
|
|
By:
How did Norv Tuner last 6 years in San Diego
!! |
|
By:
san diego offense is awful
|
|
By:
and this match stinks of unders
|
|
By:
this match is defence city so far
|
|
By:
NO SAINTS CAR PANTHERS 0-3 17-13 24-27 38-44
Who remembers that game? |
|
By:
3 pts 1st quarter. 82 ft
|
|
By:
I don't recall it Rob.
|
|
By:
TD!!
|
|
By:
points will flood the game now .
|
|
By:
going nicely for me
|
|
By:
that's 3 times on 3rd down the colts give a penalty
gotta hurt ya |
|
By:
such an unders game
|
|
By:
Chargers playing Jets football and its effective.
|
|
By:
The probability of them winning is exactly the same at 10-3 HT as it is 14-3, but the market doesn't agree.
|
|
By:
Because Indi have time to put points up.
|
|
By:
if they don't, then the stats say Home Win 52, Road Win 7.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
10-6 will be a different matter.
|
|
By:
that would be Home Win 20 Road Win 10
|
|
By:
Gives my Indi and overs call a slight chance, could have done with that mug not dropping it on the 25 though.
|