OAKLAND RAIDERS AT DENVER BRONCOS

Denver to rack up a lot of points IMO.

Denver to score over 31 points looks an exceptional bet to me.

at 5/6

I've taken Oakland to cover and the Over.

I can't believe this wasn't a BEANIEASH thread.

I like that bet Glossy and have joined in.

I like Oakland to cover as well - by all accounts they've not looked as hopeless as people expected, although I've only watched them this season for a small part of the Indy game, and that was more out of "WTF is going on here?", so didn't get much of a vibe for how they were playing.

Denver have looked good in patches, but the Ravens gave them a hefty assist in the second half of week 1, and we've all realised exactly how rotten the Giants are right now after The Cam Newton Show. They'll probably be too good for the Raiders tonight, but it should be a decent competitive match for a while.

Out of interest, and slightly unconnected to tonight, what price did Seattle go off yesterday v Jacksonville?

Raiders getting flattered big time on their numbers vs. Colts and Jax.

Denver -14 a confident pick at 5/6

Milla - I saw 1/100 in places about Seattle

im gonna lump on Denver broncos at 1.07, anyone want to talk me out of it?

Going to watch and see after my Packers nightmare on Sunday.  Still failing to see the funny side of it as they are my team and I lost money.  Sometimes when there is comedy at the NFL it is funny like the 4 Bengals TO's in 9 possessions but when the Pack do it, dude it ain't funny and to think I didn't lay back in single figures just to cover my bet let alone greening out is sinful.

Like most I fancy Denver to rack up the points but I think the demise of this Oakland team is a little over done.  Holding back on Denver -14 for now.

Liam,

Not wishing to talk you out of it but I might suggest you consider placing your normal wager at 1.07 and just collect. 

Lumping on for peanuts is for rich people and Banksters not gamblers.  I would also suggest that lumping at 1.07 is not gambling but reckless risk taking.  Betting £100 to win a coffee and a sandwich ( if you are outside London )is one thing but like if you bet £10,000 to win £700 you probably don't need the £700 in any case but you must have so much that losing 10 large means nothing either. So if the potential loss doesn't hurt you go ahead.

How much will your life change by winning at 1.07.  What will it cost you if you lose? Risk / reward son.

Sep 23, 2013 -- 10:01PM, DirkDiggler wrote:

I can't believe this wasn't a BEANIEASH thread.

DO YOU FANCY ME OR SOMETHING. IM TAKEN PAL

thanks for the advice whispering.

I do respect your opinion and no I do not need the £100 that id aim to make but it is only because of me lumping on over the past few months that I don't, if that makes sense

DO YOU FANCY ME OR SOMETHING. IM TAKEN PAL


>>>I feel sorry for him!

.... ANYWAY I LIKE THE OKI DOKIES TO COVER TONIGHT

I havnt seen raids this year but have them +14.5 and am running very well right now

Oakland + 17.5.

Does anyone have an online stream that works the one I use on stream to watch is not working tonight thanks in advance

wen do we get goin?

Manning and Broncos score first, and early, and this could get very messy. Can't see the Raiders chasing

ok clay.bronkos by how many?

20+

RAIDERS WILL RUN LIKE HELL BUT IF THEY GO DOWN EARLY THEY WILL HAVE TO THROW

ty

This game needs to be stopped!  it's over already!

Great to see Woodson and Welker there.  2 great players.

Manning looks imperious.

Broncos hardly need any help from ridiculous home-town refereeing

Good job by the Oakland lad in batting down that pass

i only started watching american football recently and was very sceptical. i must admit its not a bad game at all.

45-0.

This kid Prior looks great!

Pryor

BORING

McFadden should be the QB

that fumble killed me

LOL!


I love it when I go to bed and get a backdoor cover!


Looks like the Broncos fumbled the play after I turned thew TV off.

I always figured you for a backdoor man, DD