|
By:
The obvious safety reasons in that fans try to catch the ball despite the dangers involved & NFL is more of a family affair than Rugby so there would be a younger inattentive band of support more susceptible to potential injury....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu7Oim0Mzwg Wearing my cynical hat for a minute tells me there's some nice bucks to be made from the extra advertising as well. Good luck ![]() |
|
By:
To be honest Bongo it is very tricky to protect yourself from the ball, especially when you are not watching, holding a pitcher of beer and a super-sized bowl of nachos.
|
|
By:
Thank you Hayden and Swardean - i liked the link. It seems the answer is that the seating behind the endzone is like a crowded bar/snacking area with a massive hole in it for machinery to come in/out. Not a place to be sending in a projectile from a Mick Luckhurst.
|
|
By:
Also, on the crowd saftety point, in NFL posts are much further back than on a rugby pitch so vast majority of kicks would end up in the crowd whereas many longer range rugby kicks will land in the dead ball area.
|
|
By:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_did_the_NFL_start_using_the_net_in_the_back_of_the_field_goal_and_why_was_it_implemented
|
|
By:
NETTING REQUIRED
![]() http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQcyAmEUKzI |
|
By:
interesting reasoning in the wiki answers
dont they do exactly this in baseball i.e. fight for the balls? it is blatantly advertising imo |
|
By:
I wondered if it was also to help in deciding if the ball did go through on the higher kicks on replay , but they seem to be a lot wider , and it cant be to stop fans keeping the balls as most TD scorers give then to someone in the crowd
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
to stop court cases to decide owenersip of the ball
|
|
By:
ownership
|