North American
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
16 Jun 11
15:27
Joined:
Date Joined:
14 Sep 02
ffs! useless bunch of fckwits. 4-2 lead going into bottom of 9th and their closer gives up 2 
phi with lee must be mortgage job material tonight (cue upset)
phi with lee must be mortgage job material tonight (cue upset)
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 80
|
By:
My highlight was the Rockies game, which was coasting along nicely at 1-1 in the bottom of the 6th.
Chad Qualls comes in (he has given up one run in his last bazillion appearances) with a couple inherited, and the Rockies plate 5. I sweat out the game, on under 8.5, and in the top of the ninth, down to their last out on a 0-2 count, the Padres score to go over. [>o] The dog has sent away for a knacker protector. |
|
By:
that sounds very harsh
 |
|
By:
Cliff Lee pitching a shutout and helping out the Phils' terrible offense
 |
|
By:
Ok ... My turn, GVL.
So last night, K-Rod blows a two run save in the bottom of the ninth (**** happens) but then Atlanta wins it in extras ON A TWO OUT BALK!? I win  |
|
By:
lol didn't see that. was watching the sox and thought tampa bay were going to level it in the 9th. chaotic random sport to bet on
is there a stats site that lists p/l for pitchers? covers.com has p/l for teams at vegas odds but can't find any for pitchers. want to try opposing the so-called stud pitchers, as they do lose, and at good odds. |
|
By:
...
http://www.covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/mlb/statistics/2011/startermoneystatistics_mlb_regular.html That sort of thing? |
|
By:
aha! starter = pitcher. the penny drops.
|
|
By:
hmmm might not be such a good idea opposing stud pitchers
ty |
|
By:
opposing Halladay run line was pretty profitable earlier in the season
|
|
By:
I used to oppose Santana early in the season in his pomp and it was a usually a nice little start.
Jimenez' figures are interesting. |
|
By:
lay vazquez = $
|
|
By:
what a useless bunch of pinch hitters nyy just sent in for the 9th. they just fcking stood there lol fix???
|
|
By:
They just didn't look 'at it' at all. Bizarre.
It happens, I suppose, but I thought they'd be up for a game against the Cubs. Garcia was surprisingly poor and Davis (a rag arm imo) three hit them! Pinch hitters striking out looking in the ninth drive me mad though  Ah well. |
|
By:
I was really tempted to back Cubs earlier
|
|
By:
after that insipid perf last night and up against dempster i'm going to lay nyy now. plus i remember this burnett bloke was well dodgy last year, though apparently been better this year. anyway, i am officially sh1te at this, so you should all get on nyy with your full banks
|
|
By:
back to back strikeouts from the Yankees with 1 out bases loaded
gotta love em |
|
By:
the hopeless fish, who started this fred, are going to lose their ninth in a row. this nolasco bloke is fg
|
|
By:
ffs how did the cubbies fial to level it up?
|
|
By:
gtfi!
 |
|
By:
this is one of only 2 days during the tennis season when there's no tennis and i'm shockingly bored. so i'm going to type some garbage on here. i'm going to try one of these tipping freds that i see on other phorums, even though i'm shockingly bad and ignorant about bb
and we'll try an unusual steaking plan, a reverse half martingale we'll start using last night's bets.1 back chc 1pt @ 2.42 lost -1 -1 2 back tb 1pt @ 1.73 won +0.71 -0.29 tonight's bet for those who will sensibly be laying this fred  3 back tb 1.35pt @ 1.51 very short but can't see tb losing as they've got an even better pitcher on tonight |
|
By:
3 back tb 1.35pt @ 1.51 won +0.64 +0.37
4 back chc 0.84 @ 2.88 wasn't convinced by nyy last night, but hard to go full steak vs cc, so only a half steak |
|
By:
oops was looking good at 4-1
 4 back chc 0.84 @ 2.88 lost -0.84 -0.47 5 back col 1pt @ 2.14 |
|
By:
well that was entertaining, but i can do without entertaining if the money's on
5 back col 1pt @ 2.14 won +1.11 +0.64 6 back oak 1.55pts @ 2.26 oak on a bit of a resurgence, and this gee bloke can't keep winning, can he. |
|
By:
going to assume oak win (7-2 up top of 8th). bit tempting fate, but what the hell. quite fancy minn, and since wimbledon doesn't start till midday will sit up to watch.
6 back oak 1.55pts @ 2.26 won +1.88 +2.52 7 back minn 2.49pts @ 2.38 |
|
By:
8-0 1 out in the first!
|
|
By:
nice bet twins winning 8-0 in the first
|
|
By:
crazy sport, nationals rallied from the dead against seattle earlier..
|
|
By:
pmsl never seen a pither pulled after only one out in the first
both oak and min are dogs again! can lightning strike twice???  7 back minn 2.49pts @ 2.38 won +3.32 +5.83 next bet will be 4.15pts this is where the reverse martingale gets to be fun |
|
By:
after much agonising it's going to be wash
8 back wash 4.15pts @ 1.98 and if it looks done and dusted in time might have another go with minn |
|
By:
8 back wash 4.15pts @ 1.98 won +3.92 +9.75
next bet 6.11pts no bet tonight |
|
By:
Nats: 4th, 2 on, no outs. Zimmerman is hacking away. Each game has been decided by one run - why not bunt the runners across? As it happens, they would've got one home on a bloop single by Morse.
|
|
By:
wimbledon has been rained on and all remaining matches called off, so i can watch the min @ sf game.
i'm going to reset back to the start of the reverse martingale cycle, as there's no way i can get 5 in a row 9 back minn 1pt @ 2.56 (if that wins i will be livid! ) |
|
By:
1-0 sf
stupid, ill-disciplined bet |
|
By:
9 back minn 1pt @ 2.56 lost -1 +8.75
10 back nym 1pt @ 2.56 |
|
By:
orioles most of your post was indecipherable to me lol but google is my friend and i understand some of it now
|
|
By:
Come on, you should know by now ...
I know nothing about the game, but I like to bluff it by using lots of lingo |
|
By:
well i had a vague idea, but wasn't sure.
want to back the cubbies as well, but the games are concurrent and the steaking system won't cope. |
|
By:
wtf? mets winning 14-2
why not last night, you cnts!?? lol10 back nym 1pt @ 2.56 lost -1 +7.75 lots of nice games tonight tough to choose11 back cin 1pt @ 1.95 |
|
By:
JUDAS!
|