North American
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
26 Dec 10
18:39
Joined:
Date Joined:
30 Oct 06
well to them anyhoo. dont argue with me, ive checked it out.
so would they pull some starters early to rest them for next week when they have to win??
so would they pull some starters early to rest them for next week when they have to win??
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 14
|
By:
thought this would be very comfortable for jaguars but looks like they're making a real meal of it
|
|
By:
same for seahawks if rams lose, they could rest a few players knowing they still have to beat st louis in wk17 either way.
|
|
By:
sorry should say if rams win against 49ers
|
|
By:
If Colts lose and then lose to Titans then Jags will go through if they beat Texans in Week 17
If Colts win tonight then they're through |
|
By:
if colts win tonight its irrelevant. if they win but lose next week to the titans and jacksonville win then jacksonville win the division on the divisional head to head.
|
|
By:
Whoops - got divisional thingy wrong - I thought they were both 3-3
|
|
By:
sea game is irrelevant to sea also. sods law they'll win it lol
|
|
By:
now Hasselbeck has got hurt in a meaningless game, he will probably play next week but why did they even take the chance with such an injury prone qb?
|
|
By:
Ive seen some s%%t spouted by cunnybobbler, but this thread takes the biscuit. What the hell.
|
|
By:
sorry, jollop, repeating what you'd said earlier. i didn't see your post 19:47
|
|
By:
lol what was wrong about my post?
they won...they still need to win next week, or need the jaguars to lose if theyd lost...they still need to win next week, or need the jaguars to lose the game meant less than zero |
|
By:
btw im up over 60k in the last 12 months, how much are you in profit by over that period?
 |
|
By:
400k in fantasy land
|
|
By:
well they have a shot for 3rd seed now so not less than zero imho...
|