|
By:
enjoy losing your money kid, the bears only just beat one of the worst teams in the league who happened to have there backup qb playing for most of it! comfy win for the boys, 27-10.
|
|
By:
the bears SHUOLD have beat the lions by 30 points and would have on another day
whereas dallas were lucky to score what they did against a still very mediocre redskins.. bears +9 is quite frankly stupid and its only because the books are making punters pay heavily on the bounceback same as the colts who are giving too many points up |
|
By:
Lucky to score what they did? dont really know where you are coming from on that comment, 9 times out ten the cowboys would have won that game on Sunday night and in the end only beat themselves. Cowboys are on another level to the Bears and should win with a bit in hand. I'm struggling to remember the last time Dallas lost to a team as poor as the Bears at home. Cutler = Poor mans Romo!
|
|
By:
both teams are poor prices, if that makes any sense.
|
|
By:
Nice one Bean!
|
|
By:
sc1883 Joined: 25 Jul 02
Replies: 190 18 Sep 10 08:30 Lucky to score what they did? dont really know where you are coming from on that comment, 9 times out ten the cowboys would have won that game on Sunday night and in the end only beat themselves. Cowboys are on another level to the Bears and should win with a bit in hand. I'm struggling to remember the last time Dallas lost to a team as poor as the Bears at home. Cutler = Poor mans Romo! no offence but the cowboys were never going to win against the redskins and werent in this game either over rated 'peoples' team with apish poor coach and not much better than average quarterback |
|
By:
sc1883 Joined: 25 Jul 02
Replies: 190 17 Sep 10 21:19 enjoy losing your money kid, the bears only just beat one of the worst teams in the league who happened to have there bac ==== pay the man that always paid u, |