|
By:
they all SHOULD win
but thats why they're all odds on |
|
By:
exactly but whos the best /weakest ? im thinking the 49ers,dallas n baltimore r the certs , but may stick the 6 in 5folds n a acca and a treb on the above 3
|
|
By:
Sorry I think it's a JOKE,
![]() |
|
By:
baltimore @ 4/7
g bay @ 8/15 If I were to tie up fund's @ these odd's, I'd be CRAZY [smiley:crazy] Much Simpler, just to find a The GAME and BET / Profit would more than Pay for any FRACTION you might Lose / and If they Drop a couple of games, it should only Improve the Odd's for the TRUE Beleiver |
|
By:
new england will undo that for me. will finish 3rd in that div
atlanta touch and go. |
|
By:
Lol @ new england finishing 3rd. So underrated this year.
|
|
By:
5/6 Atlanta looks a bit dodgy.
|
|
By:
underrated?!
they're 16.5 to win the superbowl with a non existent pass rush, the usual shambles of a running game, a questionable LB corps, a hole at LG with the Mankins/Kaczur problems, a #1 receiver coming off major injury, the #2 nothing close to what he was and a QB increasingly more concerned with his contract and endorsements than football. oh, and then there's their schedule. Keep backing that 16.5 |
|
By:
Where did I say I was backing them?
I think theyre been underrated by nfl fans. Unfortunatley not by the oddsmakers, as they seem to have priced them about right. Shambles at RB? This isnt the 70s mate, you win superbowls with your passing game. Their D is an issue, but they have a young secondary that should play better this year...edelman looked ok in their game last week, i think he'll do fine till Welker is healthy again. Moss might not be in his prime but is still a beast. And why shouldnt Brady get the contract he deserves? Youve got Sam Bradford getting 50 mill guaranteed ffs. Pay that man. |