Bit unfair the saturday winners get an extra day and play sunday, while the sunday winners have a short week and play saturday. Couldn't they have switched em?
Bit unfair the saturday winners get an extra day and play sunday, while the sunday winners have a short week and play saturday. Couldn't they have switched em?
as long as indi dnt win , im happy , small trades here and there , disappointing green bay went then . they were my biggest green +1155 oh and the pats +1500,,, theres always the ravens isnt it !!!!
Cards +225Saints+60Dallas +222Vikings+101Jets +325 SD+77Ravens+895 Colts-140as long as indi dnt win , im happy , small trades here and there , disappointing green bay went then . they were my biggest green +1155 oh and the pats +1500,,, theres alway
Cant wait to bump this topic in February when Brady wins his 4th ring. You will be an embarassed man harry.
;)
ur the 1 seething ace highAce High 27 Oct 15:19 Cant wait to bump this topic in February when Brady wins his 4th ring. You will be an embarassed man harry. ;)
i've got all the wildcard 'underdogs'. Dallas is red-hot, Cards (32's pre-match) have offence to spare and last year SB experience, Jets best defence and rushing offence according to the stats, the "play-off formula" (70's during their last game of the season), and Baltimore, who'll kick the teeth out of their opponents if they can't beat 'em, "smash mouth" defence at it's best.
The favourites: Indy (despise the fact that they gave away their streak, just layed down their last two games, hope they pay), NO has lost three in a row, Vikings could be underdog at home against Dallas, San Diego (got no clue).
i've got all the wildcard 'underdogs'. Dallas is red-hot, Cards (32's pre-match) have offence to spare and last year SB experience, Jets best defence and rushing offence according to the stats, the "play-off formula" (70's during their last game of t
I think the conferences will be the opposite to last weekend with the road teams winning in the NFC and the home teams winning in the AFC.
Ravens @ Colts could be tight though as Ravens were a little unlucky not to win. Ed Reed trying a lateral cost them the chance to go for a winning FG.
I think the conferences will be the opposite to last weekend with the road teams winning in the NFC and the home teams winning in the AFC.Ravens @ Colts could be tight though as Ravens were a little unlucky not to win. Ed Reed trying a lateral cost t
amazed at the +7 for the cards, +7.5 in places even, no chance that lasts, insulting line, enough questions over the saints last half dozen games of the season
amazed at the +7 for the cards, +7.5 in places even, no chance that lasts, insulting line, enough questions over the saints last half dozen games of the season
Harry, king of the aftertimers, come back to me when your beloved saints win the superbowl.
Speaking of which, Arizona +7.5...chaaaaaarge.
i havent backed the saints,.,,,its no aftertiming....you said it about the patriots and told me you will bump it when tom wins his 4th ring...obviously i told u they hadnt a prayer so that aint aftertiming
Ace High 11 Jan 01:26 Harry, king of the aftertimers, come back to me when your beloved saints win the superbowl.Speaking of which, Arizona +7.5...chaaaaaarge. i havent backed the saints,.,,,its no aftertiming....you said it about the patriots an
still sitting with massive greens on ravens and cards
and a nice green on the Colts
neutral vikings and medium red the rest
fairly happy with that. the only one that gives me worries is San Diego.
still sitting with massive greens on ravens and cardsand a nice green on the Coltsneutral vikings and medium red the restfairly happy with that. the only one that gives me worries is San Diego.
I like the Saint on -7 here. This is entirely because the Cards secondary was atrocious against GB and i like the Saints' match-up against Adams & McFadden who were constantly picked on by Rodgers & i expect Brees to do the same. Saints D should be able to slow Cards offense up especially with the help from the crowd and this should be enough to cover the spread.
I like the Saint on -7 here. This is entirely because the Cards secondary was atrocious against GB and i like the Saints' match-up against Adams & McFadden who were constantly picked on by Rodgers & i expect Brees to do the same. Saints D should be a
Saints D should be able to slow Cards offense? they havent slowed down anyone all season, just outscoring them. look at the washington and tampa game. The cards defence were awful yesterday but they will get better, and imo will be better than the saints defence. If Warner can do that to the packers rank no 2 defence, what will he do to saints?
Saints D should be able to slow Cards offense? they havent slowed down anyone all season, just outscoring them. look at the washington and tampa game. The cards defence were awful yesterday but they will get better, and imo will be better than the
Card D played quite well in the first half. The long drive with touchdown and the onside kick from Green Bay and another drive wearied the Cards down totally. The D isn't brilliant but is decent with some great dbs. But of course they need to pressure Brees like they did first half yesterday.
Card D played quite well in the first half. The long drive with touchdown and the onside kick from Green Bay and another drive wearied the Cards down totally. The D isn't brilliant but is decent with some great dbs. But of course they need to pressur
If Jason Campbell can look like the second coming of Joe Montana against the Saints D, God knows what K Dubya will do. Could be the biggest beatdown since the Rodney King affair.
If Jason Campbell can look like the second coming of Joe Montana against the Saints D, God knows what K Dubya will do. Could be the biggest beatdown since the Rodney King affair.