|
By:
Can't believe that cars are allowed to tour round a blind bend when marshalls are clearing the track. A Red Flag should mean stop.
|
|
By:
Getting more like stock car racing by the minute.
|
|
By:
WTF was Red Bull doing there with Ricardo's tyre change? They weren't even ready
|
|
By:
fix
|
|
By:
How Hamilton won this farce is beyond me. This so called race today was a complete an utter shambles. F1????
|
|
By:
Really enjoyed first half of race
Crofty drove me mad once track was dry. Trying to make it entertaining by talking up Riccardio, Perez and Vettel as race winners when overtaking is non existent |
|
By:
|
|
By:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
|
|
By:
Didn't watch any of Canada...but I was looking forward to the new Azerbaijan circuit.
What a dreadful circuit ![]() Boring layout, looks like a carpark and Azerbaijan backdrop is poor as well |
|
By:
Hamilton doesn't know what to do with his car without advices
![]() |
|
By:
Lauda said both drivers had same fault but Rosberg worked how to fix his.
Nothing worse than saying simulators are a waste of time before messing up every session of qual then not knowing which buttons to press ![]() |
|
By:
Very boring race.
|
|
By:
That's not correct. Rosberg changed to the faulty setting & the rules allowed him to be told to change it back. Hamilton's was set to the faulty setting from the start which meant he could not be advised what to change.
|
|
By:
F1 is so boring now it's not even funny
Mercedes is the most dominant car I've seen in my lifetime. In clean air it's advantage is ridiculous. All the radio chatter is just strategy of maintaining the tyres and pushing at the correct times And I found an old video from Silverstone with the proper engines. Nearly made me cry remembering an F1 engine noise in the flesh ![]() |
|
By:
Stolen from the planetf1 forum showing Mercs dominance
2001 - Ferrari poles = 9/17 (53%) 2001 - Ferrari wins = 9/17 (53%) 2002 - Ferrari poles = 10/17 (59%) 2002 - Ferrari wins = 15/17 (88%) 2003 - Ferrari poles = 8/16 (50%) 2003 - Ferrari wins = 8/16 (50%) 2004 - Ferrari poles = 12/18 (66%) 2004 - Ferrari wins = 15/18 (83%) 2010 - Red Bull poles = 15/19 (79%) 2010 - Red Bull wins = 9/19 (47%) 2011 - Red Bull poles = 18/19 (95%) 2011 - Red Bull wins = 12/19 (63%) 2012 - Red Bull poles = 8/20 (40%) 2012 - Red Bull wins = 7/20 (35%) 2013 - Red Bull poles = 11/19 (58%) 2013 - Red Bull wins = 13/19 (68%) 2014 - Merc poles = 18/19 (95%) 2014 - Merc wins = 16/19 (84%) 2015 - Merc poles = 18/19 (95%) 2015 - Merc wins = 16/19 (84%) 2016 - Merc poles = 11/12 (92%) 2016 - Merc wins = 11/12 (92%) |
|
By:
so little interest in F1 on here these days
|
|
By:
The forum is dead and so is F1
However, those Merc dominance stats blow my mind and I posted it ![]() |
|
By:
races will be more boring than during the last years, pure processions, clocking faster lap times isn't what attracts viewers!
|
|
By:
Apart from a change of usual winner it was a procession AGAIN - NO OVERTAKING!!
|
|
By:
Quite liked watching the qually sims in practice. Cars looked stupidly fast
No overtaking so only part of race worth watching is the start and the pit stop laps |
|
By:
Mercedes properly stitching up punters.
5place grid penalties kept secret and only announced after FP2 2 weekends running ![]() |
|
By:
What a ridiculous race in Hungary. Which price was Ham for top 3?
|
|
By:
I enjoyed the race and thats despite having £300 on Kimi at 20/1 and a further £150 at 7/1 on a Finnish winner
![]() |