By:
apple another company that have performed badly in 2018, they will be selling their new iphones for around
£5.000 in the future ![]() ![]() 52 week high 233.47 52 week low 142.00 current price 148.26 this one could go to around 180/200 price range, once again looking at 6 month time frame. |
By:
royal mail their share price has dropped significantly in 2018
52 week high 632.60 52 week low 266.20 current price 286.90 looking at around 340/350 price range, 6 month time frame again. |
By:
slightly different angle on this investment, actually have performed really well since the start of 2018.
netflix 52 week high 432.21 52 week low 204.00 current price 297.57 the price was 233.80 on 24 th december 2018 ![]() price range 350/375 this could take a little longer to achieve that price,im thinking 9 months time frame. |
By:
faccbook 137.95 buy
![]() apple 148.26 buy ![]() royal mail 286.90 buy target 340/350 6 months netflix 297.57 buy target 350/375 9 months ![]() |
By:
The giro won't go far on these.
Interesting bit of fun mind. |
By:
your right its already run out and still got another 2 weeks to go
![]() ![]() lot of companies to invest in through the years, all of them have been monster hits, just never had the money to invest, so i know my skill level is up with the best. just waiting for the flat season now to start, ive put all the strategies in place already. obviously im not familiar with the upswings of the stocks, as you can see the ones ive picked have had massive downturn in thier prices, im wondering is it like this every year ![]() |
By:
The Sunday Times, January 6 2019, 12:01am
When Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone on January 9, 2007, Mike Lazaridis was at home, working up a sweat on his treadmill. On the television, the co-founder and showman of Apple was waxing poetic about the elegant little rectangle with a touchscreen and full web browser. The founder of Research in Motion, whose flagship product, Blackberry, had half the nascent smartphone market, wondered: “How did they do that?” He spoke to Jim Balsillie, his co-chief executive, and he was not alarmed. “We’ll be fine,” he opined. BlackBerry, of course, was not fine. It quickly faded into irrelevance, its market share withering from 50% to less than 1%. The Canadian company’s bosses had not realised the gravity of the moment, for it was Jobs who really rang in the smartphone era. Over the next 12 years, more than 3.7bn people would buy an iPhone, or a cheaper copycat, connecting the world like never before. It also set Apple on an unprecedented run of profits that last year led to it becoming the first public company worth more than $1 trillion. Profits grew 11-fold over the period. Every streak, though, comes to an end — even for Apple. Chief executive Tim Cook shocked investors on Wednesday with a huge profit warning. Sales of iPhones, profits and turnover had all fallen dramatically short of 2018 projections, he said, while providing little assurance that the road ahead would be easier. Apple stock plunged 9% on the news, falling from $157.92 to $144.04 and capping a torrid three months during which it has lost 39% of its value since October’s high of $232. It closed on Friday at $148.26. Investors fret that Apple’s sudden slowdown marks the crossing of the Rubicon into a new era of corporate lethargy, with Apple living off retreads of past inventions rather than coming up with new ones. Goldman Sachs went so far as to compare Apple with Nokia, another once-innovative brand that the Cupertino juggernaut swept aside. Beyond Apple itself, the shock announcement fanned concerns about a wider economic slowdown. Indeed, the following day, America’s ISM manufacturing index revealed the biggest monthly slowdown in factory activity since the 2008 recession. The Dow Jones industrial average plunged 2.8% before recovering on positive job news at the end of the week. The FTSE also yo-yoed, shedding 41 points before ending Friday in positive territory at 6,837. Apple’s fall cannot be explained away simply by a weakening economy in China — though Cook tried. “Over 100%” of worldwide sales declines, he said, were due to disappointing China sales. The problems run deeper. Nearly three in four adults on the planet have smartphones. Most of the rest will buy one, too — but they are in the developing world and unlikely to be able to afford an iPhone. The upshot is that we have reached what Benedict Evans, a partner at venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, has called “the end of the beginning”. The era of an always-on, wired-in planet of consumers has arrived. By extension, the era of smartphone mega-growth appears to be over. Indeed, sales of high-end smartphones peaked in 2015 and have gone down every year since. Last year was the first that smartphone sales, at all price points, fell, according to Bernstein Research. Which harks back to BlackBerry’s flat-footed founders. Their company was obliterated by a new product that redefined what a phone could be. Today, despite design supremo Sir Jony Ive’s best efforts, the iPhone is not appreciably different from any number of rivals with huge touchscreens, professional-quality cameras and superfast connections. Yet Cook still sells his smartphones as if they are. The average retail price for an iPhone is about $800 (£630)— almost five times the average for a non- Apple handset. Not surprisingly, people are holding on to them longer. The average upgrade cycle — when people trade in old phones for new models — has extended from two years to three, robbing Apple of a key profit driver. Cook did not countenance the possibility last week that he may have gone too far with the £1,000 iPhone X, or other models that sell at a premium to rival models with similar capabilities. Bernstein’s Toni Sacconaghi understood his dilemma, writing: “Drop prices and margins will be pressured and could cannibalise higher-end offerings. Maintain prices, and customers could increasingly look to less expensive alternatives.” Perhaps the most salient point revealed by last week’s announcement was that Apple has lost China, the world’s second-biggest economy and source of a fifth of the company’s sales. There are several reasons, but the biggest is WeChat. The app, created by Chinese giant Tencent, is central to life in the People’s Republic in a way that most westerners simply can’t comprehend. It is a social network that allows people to book travel, hail a cab, pay for lunch, make phone calls, transfer funds . . . the list goes on. And it works on the cheapest Android handsets just as well as it does on an iPhone X. The key to the appeal of the iPhone as a luxury product is its iOS operating system, which houses messages, photos and contacts — and manages apps — that are shared across other Apple devices. This makes it painful for anyone to give up their iPhone for a rival. If you leave, you lose it all. That has created an incredibly powerful moat around the Apple fortress. WeChat, however, obviates the need for iOS, which makes it that much harder to justify paying for an iPhone. A China-based businessman said: “Why would I pay $800 more for a piece of hardware where all I need it for is WeChat? It makes no sense. The iPhone is just one phone of many — and it’s by far the most expensive.” Indeed, while the iPhone has more than a third of the British market, in China its share has halved from 14% to 7% in the past three years. Apple’s stumble also appears to have confirmed the worst fears of investors who have grown increasingly concerned that China, the engine of the global economy’s post-recession resurgence, is slowing down. Chinese car sales in November plunged 14% from the same month the year before — a fall that was “quite unprecedented”, said George Magnus, associate at Oxford University’s China Centre and author of the book Red Flags: Why Xi’s China is in Jeopardy. He said that the fall, along with meagre income growth, contracting factory activity and a jump in the household debt-to-income ratio to 107% — near the level America hit before the recession — were all signs that “the slowdown in China is becoming ubiquitous”. Donald Trump’s trade war has added to the problems. Cook admitted last week that the tension between Washington and Beijing “appeared to reach consumers as well, with traffic to our retail stores and our channel partners in China declining”. The Chinese have a history of selectively shunning foreign products, either through state-sponsored campaigns or spontaneous boycotts. Beijing boycotted Norwegian salmon after dissident Liu Xiaobo was awarded the Nobel peace prize in Oslo in 2010. Japanese products were hit in 2013 in the wake of a territorial row over the Senkaku Islands. Magnus said: “The Chinese have form here.” Referring to the recent arrest in Canada of the finance chief of the Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, at America’s behest, a China insider said: “If you arrest a Chinese chief financial officer, people view it here as all-out war. Apple has become a lightning rod for everything American at the moment.” The good news is that Apple is neither BlackBerry nor Nokia. It has $130bn in cash, which is enough to buy, say, Netflix. It sells more Apple Watch models than all the timepieces turned out by Switzerland. Its services business, which encompasses everything from iCloud to the App Store and Apple Music, is on pace to bring in more than $40bn this year and is wildly profitable. Apple Music is an empire within the empire that, if it stood alone, would easily slot into the Fortune 100 rankings of the top US companies. It is a key area for Cook. Short of a “next big thing” such as a big plunge into healthcare or a self-driving car (Apple is developing an electric car, but it is thought to be years away), the company must pull the levers it can to extract more cash from its iPhones and iPads. Apple has an installed base of 1.3bn devices around the world. This is why Cook has signed the likes of Steven Spielberg, Jennifer Aniston and Oprah Winfrey to huge contracts for shows that it plans to offer in a beefed-up Apple Music subscription that will include streaming films. Cook’s next trick: turning every Apple device into a cash machine that, every month, sends cash — be it through subscriptions or a cut of in-app purchases — back to the “spaceship” campus in Silicon Valley. It is not as sexy as a category-defining gadget but, for Apple, which is approaching 43 years old, figuring out creative new ways to make money off its past glories is vital. In his investor letter, Cook wrote: “Apple innovates like no other company on Earth, and we are not taking our foot off the gas.” The problem is that since Cook took over in 2011, Apple’s innovation record has been lacking — and the era of mega-growth, which was unleashed by the smartphone revolution and has defined Cook’s reign, is over. Apple iPhone XS Max, from £1,099 The handset has a huge, 6.5in display and takes great photos with a minimum of fuss. It also has a hard-to-swallow price tag, no headphone jack and no fingerprint sensor (use face recognition to unlock). Wireless charging is useful, but slower than relying on an old-fashioned cable. Huawei Mate 20 Pro, £900 Not an Apple fan? Android is the only other smartphone system in town, and the Mate20 Pro shows it off in state-of-the-art hardware. That means a triple-lens camera, massive battery, fingerprint sensor built into the screen, and a “wraparound” display to make the iPhone look stale. Motorola One, £280 Motorola has found the sweet spot between hi-tech and low price. Its new One largely lacks the extra, probably unwanted, apps that many makers load onto Android, and concentrates on what most users want: long battery life, big screen, turbo recharging and, at 64GB, generous storage. |
By:
|
By:
the sunday times whos share tips for 2018 finished 27% down last
![]() on the planet would of heard of. thats not my bag ![]() |
By:
the percieved wisdom when investing in stockmarkets is always to spread the risk around a few companies and different sectors
![]() this line is always trotted out by industry experts ect ect, my preferred style of investing is to go ALL IN on just one company, how that company is chosen, is not by doing research and listening to industry experts ![]() ![]() |
By:
google finance WATCHLIST
alphabet 1063 current price (1291) (977) spotify 121 current price (199) (103) they have never made a profit ![]() been able to workout how they can make a profit yet ![]() tesco 218 (266) (187) this share looking at the graphs has so much ups and downs, anything under 200 and that would be a BUY. target 220/230 6 months paypal 90 (93) (70) target 110/120 6 months, this companies growth potential looks good warren buffett apparently one of his favourite companies is APPLE and he holds 74 million shares ![]() |
By:
it took 10 days to achieve, what i thought might take 9 months
![]() ![]() NETFLIX 297.57 BUY NETFLIX 352.00 SELL ![]() |
By:
two more for the watchlist
snap current price 6.50 (21.22) (4.82) they have a few class action court cases coming up ![]() twitter current price 32.96 (47.79) (22.04) |
By:
snap current price 5.77 BUY (21.22) (4.82) target price 7.00/7.50 and hope the court cases go well later this month, the founder refused to sell the company for 30 billion to google, which was a big mistake.
more of a speculative pick ![]() |
By:
one more for the watchlist
fintech 17.38 euros (36.00) (15.04) snoop dog's investment fund are buying the stock ![]() |
By:
"be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful" warren buffett
netflix 297.57 buy netflix 352.00 sell netflix current price 325.16 ![]() apparently individual investors are good at picking stocks, the institutions always beat them when it comes to selling stocks in the long run. dont know if that is because they sell the stock to early or too late. |
By:
been watching the markets closely everyday, noticed royal mail had stabilized around the 300 for the last week or so, seen it climbing, was thinking to myself whats happening? hadn't heard any news, what do you know
they were about to release their last 9 months trading statement ![]() sold at 300 mark. good lesson learned there ![]() dump the stock. SNAP 5.77 buy SNAP 6.40 sell they got their trading statement coming out soon, not expecting good news from them either. next trade going to be PAYPAL PAYPAL 90.94 buy ![]() |
By:
SNAP was a good trade, got back most of its value, after it dropped suddenly when the finance director
decided to resign ![]() netflix trade took 10 days snap trade took 13 days |
By:
|
By:
APPLE 148.26 buy
APPLE 162.00 sell APPLE trade took 25 days |
By:
facebook just smashed through the target of 160 dollars in after hours trading, Q 4 results are great
![]() |
By:
traders term facebooks shares POPPED to 167 after the Q 4 results, going to sell tomoro
![]() another thing ive learnt over the last month is how these big companies are evolving their financial results reports, in other words they are being very clever in what they will be disclosing in future reports ![]() earnings results. |
By:
FACEBOOK 167.00 sell
|
By:
NETFLIX 297.57 entry = 352.00 exit (5th jan to 15th jan)
SNAP 5.77 entry = 6.40 exit (16th jan to 29th jan) APPLE 148.26 entry = 162.00 exit (5th jan to 30th jan) FACEBOOK 137.95 entry = 167.00 exit ( 5th jan to 31st jan) ROYAL MAIL 286.90 entry HOLD current price 270 ( sell order at 280.00) PAYPAL 90.94 entry HOLD current 87.92 ( sell order at 100.00) WATCHLIST ALPHABET 1063.00 current price 1109.00 SPOTIFY 121.00 current price 138.00 TWITTER 32.96 current price 33.04 FINTECH 17.38 current price 18.96 TESCO 218.00 current price 222.70 ( buy order at 200.00) most of the work has been done now. |
By:
these are some of my thoughts on what these companies might be worth over the long haul
![]() AMAZON.COM.INC current market cap 840 billion (2 trillion) APPLE INC. current market cap 784 billion (1.5 trillion) ALPHABET INC (GOOGLE) CLASS A 783 billion (1.5 trillion) FACEBOOK.INC. 478 billion (1 trillion) |
By:
Be nice to people on the up....
![]() |
By:
|
By:
will have to find something lot more challenging than horse racing and stocks and shares in the future
![]() ![]() |
By:
a good excerpt from phill bull's autobiography
The truth is that backers are not betting against the bookmakers, or against the tote. They're betting against one another, with the bookies and the tote as middlemen, taking a rake-off for their services. The rake-off is so so big that only a few can win. The question is how to be one of the few. |
By:
Should have read, be nice to people on the way up...
|
By:
SNAP's earning reports must of been good they just hit $8.18 they have exceeded my target of $7.50
![]() thats 43% in just 20 days ![]() |
By:
|
By:
one month has passed since i put up PAYPAL at 90.84 they are now at around 98 dollars, dont know whats
taking so long to reach the 100$ mark ![]() month, there really was a hidden gem amongst those share tips ![]() |
By:
Market up 30% since 24th Dec - some individual companies up alot more - 'Best start to the year' only occurred a few other times - rare and worrisome, so watch out for the 'vix'
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/01/stocks-just-did-something-they-havent-done-in-more-than-two-decades.html CM iyc ![]() |
By:
who predicted this, the legend RR46 the best figures on the internet
![]() |
By:
PAYPAL have smashed the 100 dollars mark
![]() ![]() and SNAP have nearly doubled in price 11.10 dollars, snoop dogg is laughing FIN TECH GROUP at 21.80 up almost 25% will update at the end of the year to see what where highest prices the shares achieved in 2019. |
By:
so it took apple 3 months to hit the magic $200 dollars a share in double quick time
![]() im wondering can they improve on last years $233.47, as i have valued the company at 1.5 trillion, current market cap 934 billion.$250 a share this year would be amazing. must be all those different revenue streams bringing in the cash for apple ![]() |
By:
if PAYPAL can hit the $110/120 target this year,that will be superb
![]() |
By:
checked the share prices yesterday, they have all sky rocketed past my expectations
![]() |