A truly warped mind

Bristow is well Bristow, who really cares what he says, bound to be contraversial.

Words really, no actions involved,just something the libtards can hop on, really haven't much to lately.

Another atrocity committed in Ohio, the pledge a bedders let him in,reward them by murder/maiming in the name of islam,which is worse Eric or Abdul? put the current news topics in context,where do you go then?

Another Tweet from Bristow said "bet the rugby boys are ok" - prompting a reply from Brian Moore, the former England hooker who himself was abused as a child.

"I'm not even going to address the many reasons these tweets are wrong. I'll just say ignorance is no excuse for this idiocy," Moore wrote.

Ah, Pricewise Pa, Borneo's right hand man.....on straight away to defend him

To be clear, are you agreeing with Borneo's sentiments as highlighted in bold in the OP?

(P.S. None of your transparent diversionary whataboutery Ohio, etc, thanks)

Of course no "whataboutery"

Still there you are with your "faux outrage" at a few words and not a peep out of you when atrocities are committed in the name of a religion you defend.

Cop on Biy

Are you agreeing with Borneo's sentiment highlighted in bold in the OP?

Or is it against Party rules to openly disagree with your Puppet Master and Commander in print?

Thanks in advance!

I'm just quite stunned of your own reaction to Bristow.

As you know i am impartial, i cannot understand why you are making a big song and dance with this and silence in regards Ohio and any other atrocity.

Your priorities seem wrong.

Cat got your tongue, Pricewise Pa?

Or just terrified of openly condemning your Patron?

When ya got the twist out of your knickers see 12.35 post there.

And for the love of God calm down, remember is words and remember it is Eric Bristow.

So do you agree with Bristow's and Borneo's sentiment?

It's a simple question...why do you keep swerving it?

Because it is non news and only an excuse for libtards to pontificate.

I don't know in what context Wildman made his remarks,usually has a sound reason.

Bristows comments are plain wrong as the sufferer has to wait years and who knows how many suffer in the meantime.

Hardly a non-story.

Sex abuse of minors is headline news at the moment, a widespread and grotesque social issue and ignorant neanderthal views such as Bristow's and Borneo's need to be openly condemned, lest they prevail.

Am surprised you didn't go with the 'Whaboutery Rotherham?' line.....no doubt he will.

Bristow sacked by Sky, anyway.

Twitter: Getting thick uneducated fools sacked since 2006.

I realise this ain't the point but....

The ultimate irony is that 90% of the Darts players look like big, fat, soft ****. Any top-level football of the last 25 years bar maybe Juninho or Zola would absolutely batter Bristow in a physical confrontation.

I've seen a few of Bristow interviews on Sky and thought he was a bit more considered than this. He's actually an interesting listen talking about his early life and how he got out.

Premier League Footballers are vain, feign injury and dive on the floor to win fouls, but they're not ****. They're at the top of a sport where every nation in the world competes. Impossible to get that far being a wimp.

Had to reproduce this classic...in case anyone missed it;

News Thump

Eric Bristow announces bid to become Daily Mail columnist


Former darts player has made a play for a lucrative position at the Daily Mail by saying horrifically offensive things on social media.

After suggesting victims of paedophilia are wimps for not sorting out their abusers once they were grown-up, Bristow told the Daily Mail he could write something like this every week and how do Wednesdays work for them.

Bristow explained, “I’m a 59-year-old white man who was big in the 80’s, so I obviously know what’s wrong with this country, and I can write about it on demand.

“Sometimes a tweet just isn’t long enough for me to articulate my views on pooftas, wimps and justice, but the Daily Mail seems like the right place for my thoughts.

“There is nothing in the Daily Mail I couldn’t have written, with a bit more wimps and pooftas, obviously.

“People love me. No, seriously, they do.”

Upon hearing that Eric Bristow had made a pitch for his lucrative position, Richard Littlejohn simply tweeted, “Gay **** bender ****.”

Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre told reporters, “Eric has talent, obviously.

“The way he’s skilfully outraged millions of liberal social media users, but simultaneously has the moron hordes exclaiming that he’s ‘telling it like it is’ and is ‘just what the country needs’ – that’s a unique ability, and quintessentially Daily Mail.

“500 words by Friday, please Eric.”

I think, therefore I am (not a Daily Mail reader)

he was wrong..stupid thing to say..but to sack him is a over reaction imo..he should of apoligised

Meanwhile at least two homeless people sleeping rough have died in the last weeks sub zero temperatures in Ireland............

Sorry to digress from this important topic BUT

would of, should of, could of

come on Tony....you make this basic grammatical mistake every day.  This is the land of Saints & Scholars, the lads on here have accepted you and taken to you even though you are a (dangerous?)  Immigrant, but enough is enough.....show us some respect and clean up your grammar.

Take them in, Pa, pledge them a bed!  Love your own

You are the one that said they are 53 homeless people in Ireland.


A small bit of reality instead of you getting on your moral high horse at faux rage ovger some z celebs remarks.

Pa,  you are only without a roof in Ireland if you have fallen outside the system through fault of your own, ie drugs etc....which is awful but the safety blanket can only be so big.... The channels are there for everyone to have a roof, its as simple as that.

But lets not digress......

They aren't, Simon shelter cannot cope near the bus station,it is overflowing, there is no where else to go.
The goverment are pandering to private landlords.
It is easily solved.

Yeah, i wont digress and sincerely hope you can get over Mr. Bristows remarks soon enough.

The outrage is that there are people like Bristow and Borneo out there whose ignorant pubic pronouncements unfairly demean and further stigmatise these brave footballers who have come forward to highlight and thus help prevent the abomination that is child sex abuse.

next thing he will be saying is that they are only in it for the $$$$s.

No where else to go.....the country is full of empty apartments...

If they have to move up the road to get a roof, courtesy of the state...its at least a solution and no one dies.....we cannot all live in D4.

Honestly....you lefties want to have your cake and eat it.

Poor poor OZY, how old is he really kindergarten stuff once again from the google nerd.
Had to reproduce this classic...in case anyone missed it;
Get a life ffs .

On reflection , this title of this thread is apt for Ozy, a Brazilian football team died in a plane crash and Ozy,worrying his little head about a few words spoken by a guy who  most people don't take seriously anyway,beware lads, that's what happens when you spend your whole life on google.

oz..im sorry but im crap at grammar i spell as i speak!i text to much

It may be ignorance,it may be common sense but it seemed to me a legitimate question.
Bristow engaged in a bit of bravado by saying he would have " filled him in " but I too would wonder why these victims didnt exact some physical retribution when they got older.

They are thinking of charging Bristow with a hate crime for ironically using what they call a derogatory name for a homosexual.
Its ironic because the Crafty Cockney didnt use the rhyming slang iron hoof.

There is a pattern here,new crimes are created to trap the unsuspecting and silence them.

The Liberal Elite that have created these new crimes only want it applied against white people.
Rap artists are exempt.
The same Liberal Elite despise religion but champion the most homophobic religion of them all.
Imams who preach death for homosexuals are exempt as well.

what a sad cretin ozy is.takes the subject of child abuse and tries to use it in order to lower the credibility of a forum user who regularly wipes the floor with him.ozys bitterness knows no bounds.

Your comments on this matter and on St John's NS in Sligo, which funny enough was defended by certain individuals again above leave a whole host of question marks over you Wildman and some of the others above in this thread.

Rock Piper would really blow his lid if he seen more comments like this from the above ring.

insideinfo
Date Joined:    03 Mar 07
Add contact | Send message
29 Nov 16 22:20 Joined: 03 Mar 07 | Topic/replies: 2,089 | Blogger: insideinfo's blog
what a sad cretin ozy is.takes the subject of child abuse and tries to use it in order to lower the credibility of a forum user who regularly wipes the floor with him.ozys bitterness knows no bounds.

The man who would make a doormat look intelligent is back i see.

They are thinking of charging Bristow with a hate crime for ironically using what they call a derogatory name for a homosexual.

I assumed the hate crime was falsely linking paedophilia and homosexuality, something, by the way, that Borneo staunchly believes in and frequently repeats.

Ozy your anti pedophilia stance is so brave against a very strange torrent of abuse, i am surprised BF have not taken action.

I see the woman hater is the first to defend Wildman.

hey c0ckfingers,im much more intelligent than anyone who gets their kicks from trolling on a sports forum day in day out

You created the thread but have failed to answer my points.

Times change,people change

Its not unreasonable to change your opinions.
I never hated homosexuals,never wanted to kill any of them unlike your pals who like throwing them off roofs.

I feel for Pa, he may have been radicalised. 

Borneo, to give the man some credit, preys successfully on the weaker, more gullible minds on here.

I'd say Wonks is just waiting for the Trigger Word to tool up and strike back

Borneo, you have conceded that your remarks "may have been ignorant".

By your standards, that is an epic climb down.

Am glad to have shown you the light.

And while we are on the subject, you do link paedophilia and homosexuality, don't you?  In an instance such as this, for example, where an adult male is involved with young boys.

That is a supreme example of Ozymandius complete inability to engage.

He has no answer to the contradictions I've shown,he can't think on his feet so just some stock replies.

It won't be long for the temper tantrum,the descent into foul language and the capping it off with the ubiquitous picture

My last post was a response to your post of 22.49.

The word may is not a concession,its a word that qualifies.

I would have thought this case was classic paedophilia.

Wonks is no use, if there was a tooled up fight his brain would be the equivalent of someone having a plastic spoon when all else are carrying machetes bar Tony he's have a butter knife i'd say.

not sure what contradictions you are referng to....

I don't "champion any religion" btw, that's all a construct in your head.

And as for the hate crimes, you have patently failed to even understand the hate crime involved.

Th man devoid of answers to questions posed here is you.

Wrong again.
The complaint made to Staffordshire police was on the use of a derogatory word.

What question have I failed to answer ?

For what ever reason, Wildman and the rest of the ring, seem to what to make a skit of the subject.

the complaint relates to the implied link  between paedophilia and homosexuality.

which is why Bristow subsequently made a clarification.

I see your legendary inability to follow is kicking in.

The fact is you have openly linked paedophilia and homosexuality on here in the past.

Do you dispute this?

Have you read the complaint ?
There may be further complaints but the first complaint was based on that derogatory word.

Yes because 'poof' was inappropriate ....thee correct word was paedophile.  Bristow was fuelling homopohbia by lazily and incorrectly linking homosexuality and paedophilia....the word 'poof' is isolation is not hateful.

Even Eric eventually figured this out .

How many times do I have to explain it you you?

I think you may be referring to the Cathal O Searcaigh case.

Times change,the National Council For Civil Liberties allied itself to PIE in the seventies.
The Liberal Elite were very open in those days and in their rush to show their openness they went lost the run of themselves.

You yourself are the liberal of all liberals in matters sexual,you favour sex with family members so I suppose its just a pushing of boundaries.

Your explaining to the wrong person,the first complaint received by the Staffordshire police was on the word you used.

That doesn't mean there arent worse things in his tweets,it just means the first complainant might not have seen them.

Am not refering to any case.  Its news to me that I favour incest!  Classic diversion tactics.

And you are still dodging the question posed.

Your explaining to the wrong person,the first complaint received by the Staffordshire police was on the word you used.

Correct, the word is inappropriate for reasons explained ad nauseum. Hence the complaint.

During a discussion on the last referendum you defended it although you didnt use the word incest,you used something like inter family.

Codswallop.

You can change your mind too.
Although it may have been just rhetoric.

I think he was referring to his own Itinerant family.

^ Ah..... the inevitable trademark resort to personal insult.

If you had the technological capacity to post a picture, that would no doubt follow.

Again your blaming the wrong man.

I have to turn in.

Peckers appearance has done little to enliven things.   It rarely does.

Bon Soir.

Your perspective dear boy has allowed you to take insult, nothing else.

Point proven.You need more than just education.

he needs a life.

This is a Grade 1 meltdown from Ozy

Rocketfingers 22.23

What are you alluding to when you say "the above ring"?

No doubt the OP will report that comment as a "hate crime" (it is really as the implication is very nasty).
Or will he make allowances that it is rocketfingers and the gap between brain and mouth is vast?

Pa,spot on again.

Some relevant background reading for the resident intelligentsia;

http://www.joekort.com/articles.htm/Homosexuality_and_Pedophilia/articles50.htm

Nothing like a good ould google.

The whole thread is simple,your feigned outrage because you tried to show up a poster that is consisently running rings around you, that's it in a nutshell, move on and wait til the next time.

I didn't expect the likes of yourself Lapsy, to be interested in broadening ones knowledge, knuckle draggers rarely are.

Borneo can't open links, Lapsy ain't interest in high falutin' scientific research (prefers the intellectual rigour of the barstool)and Wonks can barely read.

Dumb, dumber and dumbest.

that's what you are up against

^^ seething imo ^^

^^ seething imo ^^

Ozy, if it wasn't for google you'd know sfa...

Says the idiot who copies and pastes every obscure passage he can find to pass it off as his own

There is more IQ growing on the roof of Ozy's Garden shed that what you have Workrider.

I'd recommend Ozymandius or the other moralisers to watch Bristows interview with Piers Morgan.
The man you call a knuckledragger,a Neanderthal,swivel eyed argued with logic and clearly won the exchange.

Its amazing the way liberals hate who they deem the working class.
Morgan threw everything at him but his core point was valid and he stuck to it,if this happened him as a kid he would have returned and exacted physical retribution when he was an adult,thirty years after the event is too late.

They had a woman on to berate him,three of her children were abused,she called him the most despicable person ever to draw breath.
I wonder what she thinks of the gentleman who abused her kids.

This is the classic liberal stance,thoughts and speech are far worse than actions.

How exactly is his core point valid?

The last thing the majority of abused children want to do is confront their abuser later in life for a multitude of reasons.  One is that it brings back painful, embarrassing memories that they want to surpress, another is that they can't bear any further contact with their abuser, another is that they  frequently retain guilt that they have brought in on themselves etc etc.  These are not my views, these are well established facts as conveyed by the abused.

For the moron Bristow to laddishly label these victims cowards, place himself in the shoes of the abused (he can in no way understand or relate to what they have gone through) and brag about what he would or wouldn't have done is appalling.

His views are the very epitomie of ignorance. And it's no surprise that you have labelled them as 'correct'

Its more a working class thing to inflict violence on someone that wronged you,the thought police will never get that.

If someone had returned to thump one of these abusers it would have shone a light on something and could have spared others.

Bristow is not very literate and Morgan and the hate mob saw an easy target to show their virtue,not unlike you with your bogus pledging of beds.

Everybody would love to thump these abusers, that goes without saying, and naturally it might spare others,  but there are sound reasons, outlined above, as to why labelling those abused who don't do this as 'cowards', is ignorant.  that's the central issued being discussed on this thread.

It's really quite straightforward....and you are visibly  floundering and muddying the waters by returning to your touchstones of working class'...and naturally, immigration.

Its not the central issue at all.
Bristow acknowledged calling them cowards was wrong and apologised.

The central issue was a bit of old fashioned rough justice would not have gone astray here,it would have led to some investigations and saved some newer victims.

You and your fellow thought police can't comprehend this so you dishonestly concentrate on his wrongly calling them cowards.

There is also some good advice in his admittedly uncouth words,always tell someone not alone for yourself but for others following on.

Of course it was the central issue.....it's why he lost his job and appeared on Piers Morgan.

Nobody would have batted an eyelid if he had said these abusers deserve rough justice.  Nobody debates or questions this.

That's not what he said,he said if it were me he would have gone back when he was older and sorted out the ............

That's the tweet that sent the no platform merchants and the twitter police into a frenzy.

He lost his job because Sky are terrified of the twitter police.
He was interviewed by Piers Morgan because it was in the news and gave what Morgan thought was an open goal and a chance for Piers to parade his goodness and tear asunder this Neanderthal,it didnt quite work out that way.

The thought police are hell bent on suppressing certain views.
They wait for some unsuspecting Sportstar to use some now frowned upon word.

The message has got out though any viewpoint that could be deemed as right wing is not allowed,it will lead you to lose your job.
In Sweden it leads you to lose your children.
Amazingly in Rotherham it led to a foster couple being turned down for fostering because they supported UKIP.

You appear to be confusing free speech with absence of consequence.

His rights to free speech have not been taken away..he is free to continue tweeting..his views have not been suppressed.

Sky, correctly decided that they did not want to be publicly represented by a man with such abhorrent crass, insensitive views.  That is as much their right, as it is his to say what he likes on Twitter.

We have all these labour laws,its near impossible to sack someone yet in these cases they are sacked without even a hearing.

Social media is evolving but already we have Facebook closing the accounts of right wingers.

The most notorious example of this was after the Orlando shooting,Pamela Geller had her Faceook account closed but the father of the shooter had his Islamic rants left in all their glory.

Katie Hopkins is a journalist who got Brexit and the US election right yet there was a chorus of complaints demanding she be dropped from a Late Late Show appearance for her views.
They even screamed the place down when she was interviewed by Pat Kenny.

Ozy,your post below was very touching indeed,in fact it was so real I have to say if you hadn't confirmed it didn't happen to you ,I would have sworn it did.Your insight was breathtaking ,almost as if you'd lived it.

Thank you Wonks, I am glad I got my point across vividly and that you managed to both follow and absorb it.  A first.  Perhaps I should try my hand at penning childrens' books.

alternatively ozy you could just try living in the real world,have some interaction with real people.have a shower,get dressed,go out,breathe some fresh air.enjoy life,instead of busting your balls every day on here tyring to either belittle of impress faceless individuals,the majority of whom rightly think you're a complete tool.

I think we proved who the complete tool was on your wildly popular 'PM me' thread embarrasment.

It's little wonder that you are still lashing out!

Wonks & Pa, I just PM'd you there, take a look pls.

ooh i seem to have hit a nerve and if thats all you can come back with d'ozy you're in trouble.you have no idea how many actually pm'd me after that post,for those that i replied to i sent 2 horses one of which won.workrider for one can probably confirm that.

Insideinfo is an absolute goon, i think he is now part of Wildman's ring.

^^^ from the dope who backs d'ozy up ^^^

Had a look at the Bristow/Morgan interview.Bristow comes across as an inarticulate alcoholic who isn't the sharpest tool in the shed.

I think Eddie Batt is right in his summation.
That however shouldn't disqualify him from having opinions.

All seem to accept his comments were inarticulate and badly put but the Twitter mob just showed their snobbishness and inability to tolerate differing views in their baying.

Bristow s appearance on TV was just a modern form of bear baiting.
He was brought in shouted and screamed at,harried not allowed to answer.
Morgan was in his element,an easy target where he could parade his goodness and his ride on views.
He was duly prodded and baited and finally he made the desired mistake by saying to Susanna " its rife darling " Morgan pounced in that oh so gallant way protecting the honour of his co host.

The lady brought in to ratchet up the baiting took it up with gusto,three of her children were abused ( a Jersey girl situation ) she called Bristow the vilest human being to ever breathe,threatened him with violence and never got the irony that the gentlemans action in abusing her children had to be worse than Bristows words.

Too thick to even wait for a question to be posed, just rambling on incoherently, talking over the interviewers.

Even with time to get his head around the issues he couldn't understand the moronic nature of his comments.

Why are you surprised that a darts player is inarticulate ?

Is being " thick "a reason to suppress views.

Isint that the current mantra,Brexit voters thick,Trump voters dumb.

Anyone who doesn't have your views is thick or dumb.

I dislike the mob mentality.

Whatever your view you should be able to see that what went on on that programme was the modern equivalent of bear baiting.

Being "thick" is a reason to have a light shone on your views and have them shown for what they are.

Nor have his 'views' been 'surpressed' ...in fact, quite the opposite.  Twitter has given and continues to him a global platform and the media storm and live Prime Time TV appearance have exhibited his views to a wider audience. Shirley, as part of your free speech mantra, those that disagree with him are entitled to air their views also?

Unlike you, I have no expectations about the articulateness of Darts Players one way or another.  That would be judgemetal.  For all we know, Michael Van Gerwin, may have turned down an Oxbrige place to concentration on 'is 'arrows, innit?

oz im sure amongst the darts "athletes" theres many a high iq . after all they have to make up figures in nano seconds and try and throw darts at the same time?

No doubt, Kavvie, I jest. 

Wasn't Jockey Wilson on Mastermind one year?

i was jesting too!!  doubt jockey made it to mastermind?  maybe in the audience?!?!