|
By:
Dermot won't like the implication of your comment workrider. Not like you to criticise the Curragh's finest.
|
|
By:
What is the implication exactly ?
All I can see here is that the horse isn't qualified to run. It's never ever going to carry 10st 4lb. |
|
By:
Its not a criticism , anyone who has rode out would understand , ask any trainer if they would put anyone over 10st on a 2yo even for a gallop .
|
|
By:
the conditions clearly stated that any horse rated 75 would carry 9-10. Dermot's is rated 83......so therefore?
And you are right I was never bandy-legged. |