Irish Sports
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Still the same old with this headless goose. Today at Cork - 1st 2 races - we are told Seven Nation Army was the "nb". Beaten at 1-2 
.
However, all was not lost for those brave enough to try to recoup losses. He tells us Bamako Moriviere was worthy of the "nap". A lovely 1-12 winner
. Well done Peter.
In his "write up" he states he "will not be a betting proposition at very long odds-on".
SO WHY DID YOU NAP IT PETER?
Guy is clearly several tins short of a 6 pack.
.However, all was not lost for those brave enough to try to recoup losses. He tells us Bamako Moriviere was worthy of the "nap". A lovely 1-12 winner
. Well done Peter.In his "write up" he states he "will not be a betting proposition at very long odds-on".
SO WHY DID YOU NAP IT PETER?
Guy is clearly several tins short of a 6 pack.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 17
|
By:
How you could tip up Seven Nation Army?
A total hound |
|
By:
Peter OHehir manages to show a profit to a level stake every year on his naps.
This is some achievement when you insider its computed on an SP that is controlled by the big bookmakers. Peter OHehir napped Intelligence Cross today,that was his outright nap. He has had 32 naps this year,22 of them have won yielding a profit of 8.11 points. This tipster is a rarity in that he seems to win every year. |
|
By:
Wildman
Where do you see those figures? is this the Irish Field Naps? If he has a NB & Nap where does that appear and how does he get on there? I agree anyone showing a profit at SP is an achievement! |
|
By:
Yes its The Irish Field naps table.
Its the only verifiable record I know of and he seems to be in profit every year. |
|
By:
Its the usual painful apples and oranges comparison, that we have had a hundred times already on this topic.
Slickster is talking about the daily Daily Star Tips and Borneo is talking about his weekly Irish field Naps. |
|
By:
Geez, you really are a pain in the b0ll0x.
|
|
By:
Happy Monday! |
|
By:
Ozy, owned by Wildmanfromborneo AGAIN......
|
|
By:
d'ozy
|
|
By:
Can't you get anything right ?
|
|
By:
The wildman being deliberately obtuse, yet again. The word "nap" and "1-12" should have given the game away. They don't belong in the same sentence. Well, not to normal people anyway.
But I need to thank him for proving my point. I will take you at your word. So he has 22 out of 32 successful "naps". These are obviously just the weekend only. Very few losers eh... Yet, incredibly, he is barely in profit . What was his biggest priced "winner"? 4-7??? .At least you got the paper correct. Well done. |
|
By:
theres nothing wrong with backing odds on shots if you have a strike rate high enough to show a profit over a given period.while you say he may be barely in profit,hes in profit and thats what matters thickster.id guarantee if you were to tip up 32 odds on chances you would likely show a massive loss to level stakes.we've saw your peevious tipping "efforts"
|
|
By:
Slickster his bet of the weekend wasn't the two horses you highlighted,it was Intelligence Cross on The Curragh.
This is a good case in point,this horse was available at 2/1 on the track yet was returned at 11/8 that's whats his profit is based on. You claim he naps the shortest price horse on the day,well he didnt on Sunday. |
|
By:
Thick, has a thing about Peter methinks...
 |
|
By:
Today's "nugget" was, naturally, odds on, and, naturally enough, beaten
. 4.55 Gowran Park Mack Attack. 4-7. And, equally naturally, THE SHORTEST ONE ON THE CARD |
|
By:
naturally,ur a ****,dickster,and naturally,you,use,too many,commas,
|
|
By:
also is naturally the word you learnt how to spell/use in day centre today?
|