Very poor bunch, pretty clueless in fact, the odd nugget is given out usually by BWS, Ozy and Norn, not one of you have ever illustrated you can price up a race accurately, with some getting excited if they have the right jolly. If i was bf i'd run you each and every one of you.
Most people enjoy their racing in any case,probably the most clueless on here was the"Dirar has to be a strong lay",how does that fit in in the scheme of things?
It was the most clueless and not just pretty clueless of any that ever graced this forum since its inception.
How would you rate them on the Eurovision?Most people enjoy their racing in any case,probably the most clueless on here was the"Dirar has to be a strong lay",how does that fit in in the scheme of things? It was the most clueless and not just pretty c
One of the best bits of forum comedy was when Pa priced up a horse at 8/11, horse started fav but 15/8, pa was held up by wildclown as the compiler on the forum for horse racing odds because the horse started fav
One of the best bits of forum comedy was when Pa priced up a horse at 8/11, horse started fav but 15/8, pa was held up by wildclown as the compiler on the forum for horse racing odds because the horse started fav
Check out my recommendations Galileo Gold at 14s in the 2000 Guineas and Sword Fighter at 67s in the Queen's Vase on boards.ie (username diomed): 14+67 = 81 points (less 5%). I'm not interested in pricing up a race accurately.
Check out my recommendations Galileo Gold at 14s in the 2000 Guineas and Sword Fighter at 67s in the Queen's Vase on boards.ie (username diomed): 14+67 = 81 points (less 5%).I'm not interested in pricing up a race accurately.