Irish Sports
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting.
According to some research, the projection of one's unconscious qualities onto others is a common process in everyday life.
According to some research, the projection of one's unconscious qualities onto others is a common process in everyday life.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 15
|
By:
This may not be something new ozy:
And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Pause for thought for everyone but does it render every debate potentially unsound if true? I guess, like everything, there's am element of truth within. |
|
By:
Dead right its not new,this is the umpteenth time our sensitive friend has brought it up.
The Opening Poster is however a perfect example of what he is trying to convey,his lack of understanding of nuance and different angles leads him to shout repetitive yet tis he that's the repetitive one. |
|
By:
Leave it to OZY to present THEORY as fact .
 |
|
By:
If you swapped the "rude" for "bitter" in the opening post, where does that leave you by your own logic?
|
|
By:
A little honest self-analysis never did anyone any harm.
|
|
By:
another pointless post from this op just to get someone to talk to him.
|
|
By:
I can't recall ever making this point before.
Touche, Pa. However if the 'bitter' point is coming from multiple sources, it should give one pause to think. Unless of course it's all just one person with multiple usernames  I must have got properly under the skin of this Inside Info character. Strange because I barely ever engage with him. Still, I suppose a few well chosen words are enough to transport him to a permanent state of seethe. I'd say he hasn't been this wound up since Geravaghy Road. Shades of that other Northern Irish chap, from the other side of the divide, his name now escapes me. It got to the point whee 80%+ of his posts were about me, had to block him eventually. I do seem to routinely attract these obsessive stalker types. |
|
By:
although you are a complete moron ozy it would take alot more than your keyboard warrior antics to actually bother me.you are right though in that we all dislike you.
|
|
By:
oh and i think its more a case that i have got under your skin than the other way round.sure wasnt it you sending me pm's asking me to leave you alone ffs lol.i still have them btw
|
|
By:
You keep mentioning these 'begging' PM's in a threatening fashion.
So I will publish them below in full, for all to see. They represent nothing but an overture to you to settle down and not to engage in a daily one-way barrage of personal insults. They date back to April, at that time, I rarely engaged with you, if at all (much like now, today being an exception). Your angst, in part, dated back to a comment I had made to you during the EasyGob affair, when all your pals skiddadled, and your subsequent hounding of Callit. My PM was polite and constructive, an olive branch if you will, not borne of fear or an inability to respond in kind  as you seem to misconstrue, but rather a preference on my behalf not to bother engaging with you. That remains my position. I have previously sought to becalm situations with other forumites behind the scenes. Such conversations have been invariably civil and constructive. Not the case with you. At the time, I thought you were possibly alright, just caught on the wrong side of a spat. However the incendiary way you responded to my PMs confirmed otherwise ( I will not publish your replies, that is your business), as has your conduct ever since. Good day, Sir. ************************************************************* From Ozymandius on Mar 30, 11:05PM: I make one comment to you abut 6 weeks ago to call you out about your incessant constant and unnecessary knocking of Callit...and ever since, every time you log in you have a go at me. I refuse to get into daily childish tit for tat, with you, Insisde. That really would be SAD. Get over yourself and move on. From Ozymandius on Apr 2, 03:36PM: Oh, I can take it alright...you miss the point. I really only had one go at you. Since then you snapped back several times over a period of time. All of which I have ignored. I don't wish to get into a escalating tit for tat situation with you. Your call. I suggest you pick a battle with someone else because if you continue there will come a point when my nature will necessitate that I respond in kind and I would prefer to not have to bother. A number of additional points: 1. I have only one other username (itcanbedone) which I am open about 2. I know XXXXX well and I can assure you he only has only one other username (XXXXXXXX). 3. I cannot speak for YYYYY (he has other usernames, I suspect ZZZZZZZ though I don't know for sure) . Personally I find his schtick harmless and nothing to be getting upset about. Half of the time he puts up horses that he thinks will lose just to get a reaction. Reacting just encourages him. All the best, Ozy! Apr 2, 07:18PM as you wish..... disabled housebound gay.....classy! *************************************************************************************** |
|
By:
^ I rest my case.
Absurd false assertion on top of absurd false assertion. Obscene language to boot. I won't be replying any further to you. I cannot stoop to your depths. |
|
By:
c ya
|
|
By:
Inside I think he's raised the white flag....
|
|
By:
hes your typical keyboard warrior coward workrider,gives it the big i am on here but absolutely nothing behind his bluster.sad really that he has to make such a nusiance of himself on here in order to get some interaction.
|
|
By:
too complicated for me
|