ROADRUNNERS NOTEBOOK ACCOUNTS 2013/2014

including all runs the notebooks would be minus 49.85 on 788 runs / add on the best prices for 2014 only total would be +70.15

some very interesting patterns occuring, you know like the same horses winning over and over again then again always
told you all its all about the winners not the losers, they still complained why do you only put up the winners

SEP 2013 / APR 2014

124 WINS SO FAR RETURNING 683.90 POINTS AT SP'S

AVERAGE PRICE OF 11/2

BEATING THE TARGET SET FOR THE THREAD OF 5/1

ONE CAN ONLY SPECULATE AS TOO HOW MANY POINTS WOULD BE IN PROFIT WITH BEST PRICES FROM 2013 INCLUDING AN EXTRA 75 POINTS DONT FORGET INCLUDING ALL RUNS

ONE CAN ONLY SPECULATE

Agreed

hello are you been keeping , hope you been following the horses that have been winning over and over again

Free monies innit?

Cheers imo

would like to add that dont actually check the records of the notebooks before they go on the list, usually takes 60 mins
to go through the results from a weeks worth and to write them down on a piece of paper. only later down the line that can
actually take a good look at their profiles and easily make my judgements about them. always the future potential improvers
that interest me most. gl all

SEP 2013.....5.40 minus......-5.40

OCT 2013.....38.45 minus.....-43.95

NOV 2013.....38.45 minus.....-82.40

DEC 2013.....24.85 + plus....-57.45

JAN 2014.....18.00 minus.....-75.45

FEB 2014.....33.85 + plus....-41.60

MAR 2014.....14.25 = plus.....-27.20

APR 2014......20.05 minus.....-47.25

Hope my sums are right, just two things to run by you.

1. After 8 months you are down 47.25pts appox.

2  After your first three months by your own maths you were down 82.pts, how the fook are you supposed to comeback from that, how much are you betting a point......20c.

For all your gloating about your lists, they ain't that good but best of luck in the future.

the losers don't count. Only back the winners....

calculating by points is only useful to have some idea of how the lists are performing, no where on any of my threads have stated you must be back every runner to level points, think already proved how thick some of the people are on here that kept asking me to tell them about the losers and over 50% of the horses highlighted after they achieved one win , went onto win more races.

going to do a list with over 300 horses, cant be backing every runner, as proven so far the amount of winners possible from any notebook list of horses runs to wins will be limited to a set amount depending on how good the lists are, most of my lists have a good
cross section of different types of profiles, only when you check each profile, can you actualy make more informed judgements about
future potential. when these lists where put on this forum, hadnt gone through the profiles in depth.

my lists have provided over 136 winners so far and counting. in the last year have had over 200 notebooks that have put on this forum
win in the last 12 months.

If you picked a 100 horses at random from abc over a year they will have winners. Thats what you have done. Its down 47 points so its just nonsense. I think you should just stop because your clearly on a wind up.

down 49 points at SP'S, yeah and if you put up a list of 327 horses, expect you would be down over 300 points at SP'S on all runsyour so stupid its unreal

thats 788 runs and its down only 49 points at SP'S, and you think im winding you up.

If you are going to call someone 'stupid' please be sure to utilise the word 'your' correctly ie..your notebooks are stupid and you're stupid......just a bit of friendly advice RR.
Well done for only being 49 points down btw.....great work....please keep it up....

JR when did say you must back every runner how many winners would you expect from a 1000 runs?

I'm saying well done.....Only 49 points down....incredible imo.

because you know it would be pointless backing every runner right some of these idiots on here think you must back every runner,
original statement was this is a list which should provide a few winners target being around 100+ wins, no where did i say back every runner to level stakes, hit both targets of 100 wins and the target price, without the big price winners, easily of been down lot more
points. why do think was so accurate with my avearage price at SP'S of 5/1

factor in top prices on all runners, easily over 100 - 200 points up and thats on all runs, yet as you can see from some of the people posting on this thread, totally clueless about how a large notebook list like this works. im still learning all the patterns, just
confirms to me everything already know about the business. not really shocked that most of my wins came from a few selective prolific
winners, thats the whole point of making the lists are to discover those ones

there has been less than 20 runners who have had between 5 - 10 runs without success. most of them have had only a few runs 1-2-3

how many horses won six races in a row last year on the flat and all weather, only know of one horses that achieved that amazing feat PERFECT PASTURE notebooked on my list and went onto win 4 in a row.

how many idiots claimed my lists would be 100's of points down when in actual fact more like
100's of points up

You have picked a bunch of horses that is down 47 points. You say don't back everyone. You have never said on the thread which horse to back not back. Now you clearly are either on a wind up or just not with it. Whichever it is continue in fantasy land. Because gambling is about finding winners before the race is run and not after. Also you have to actually back the winner to actually win. You say your up on best price. No where on the thread is there anything about best price. All i see is a list of horses and each time one wins you say its won. Not before the race. You never say anything about the horses that lose or when not to back them. Its called gambling. It would be an amazing world knowing when to back a horse.

you forgot the part about them being 100 - 200 points up at top prices, now why would i also have to point out the winners for you aswell on all runs

Just a quick question RR. How did you come up with the list. Did you just select them at random.

Clearly no point in have a conversation with you. I'll leave you to it. This is clearly a wind up. Bye.

yeah just a random list, why dont you try and put up over 300 horse follow list and guarantee you,
wouldnt even get close to making a profit on all runs, forget about breaking even

Why would you put up a random list. It makes no sense. You back a horse on many things. Being on a random list is not one of them.

What do you want? A big clap on the back for putting them up after the race is it? Anything you have put up beforehand lately has got beat,nothing wrong with that but if that is any indication of your lists,tis a great big load of bollix really.

I have done notebook myself for the world cup. Listed 32 teams i think one will win.

laid out all my methods from selecting horses for a list, time of year and the criteria, when that guy told everyone the world was round, that thought he was mad, your thinking is along those lines, you just dont understand, when you start with a list, your going to be miles ahead of everyone else, not interested in studying one race a day for betting purposes, my goal is multiple win on a saturday, dont you know anyone on the internet that does notebook lists? know someone who does lists as well, hes been firing in the winners all week and not at short odds either, you need to get around the different racing forums, find the people who know what they are doing. there are people out there who actually know what they are doing when it comes to selecting future winners.

now you know the lists are in profit old pa, what happened to the your lists are 100's of points down crap you was coming out with all the time

Point out where i ever said your lists were 100,,s of points down, i never did. I just don't care

wanted me to list all the losers right from the start you idiot, now its been proven that it was the winners that were most likely to win again, ask yourself why people were always viewing the thread after i put a result up?

There is probably a bit of a want in some of them.

would of clogged up the thread and you would of been posting everyday about how many losers and points the thread was down

I have to go now,me tea is ready.

enjoy your boiled cabbage + potatoes and boiled ham washed down with a guinness

http://replygif.net/i/432.gif

including all runs the notebooks would be minus 49.85 on 788 runs

now you know the lists are in profit old pa,

WTF!!

Thing with lying RR, is you need to be intelligent, as one lie will require another and also the intellect to remember the first one....

You stuck up Cambridge before the Musidora. It was beaten. Now, I have no problem with that. I would never mock another after a selection is beaten(you should try that), but you then reappear and say how her breeding was poor, and she obviously wouldn't have been good enough, and that the winner was the one to be on!! Obvious indeed.....after the fuc*in race.

The vast majority of punters can fool themselves into believing they are making money, when they are actually losing.....but you take the biscuit altogether!!

But it provides a giggle, so carry on!

you are thick as #### mate, always will be

go and read the thread again, and see if you can find the part were ive said hadnt looked at the horses profile, before it ran

Yes, RR, I can read(and write, unlike you illiterate self).

You did say you hadn't looked at its profile. But if it won, you would have been on here booming!! You cant win after losing!! Its not how the real world works!

can speak better than you and conduct myself better than you, your ****g a low life

non stop bile you put on here about me, thats tells me what type of person you are

guttersnipe wrapped in an english flag

your a low life

just updated accounts on the main betfair forum today

200pts down for 6 weeks

total runs 1497

unplaced runs 1008

placed runs 287

wins 202

total points at SP'S 1094.90

average price at SP'S 5.42 or 11/2

193 horses that havent won from the list

134 individual winners


totals on all runs 200.10 points down at SP'S

the difference between SP price and best price available is roughly around 36% over this sample size of 1500 runners, and i have taken the lowest number (percentage) and used that as my guide.

200 points down at SP'S is equal to 0.14 points down on each run (1497)

with the best price added to the totals (1094 points plus 36%), would make that an extra 393 points.

the best price totals on profit and loss would then be 193 points profit on all runs (1497),

instead of 200 points down at SP'S.

with 1 month to go, looking at around the 220 winners mark for the 12 months.

stick to betting on the dogs,where you just look at the times to the first bend

Haha if it was that easy then a semi functioning retard like yourself would even have a chance of making it pay

And sectionals are to the winning line first time, not the bend, you would have to clock that yourself

"everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler"

DOUBLE BLUFF 1ST 7/1 thats the 2nd winner of the month for the list, love to see try calling me those names to my face,
kick the **** out of you

No bother, should I drive out the N11 to you?? I presume St. John Of Gods is still your place of abode?

keep up keyboard warrior act

You're the one making the threats

yeah im making the threats, and your doing all the name calling, what came first the chicken or the egg