|
By:
My suggestion to you road runner would be gather up all your stats and place them in a fire. Then slowly pour about 3 gallons of petrol over them,and when that is done light a match and then stand back and enjoy the warm glow. If you have any ratings or ratings system,throw them in as well. When Ascot comes around,and this isnt easy (myself included),try as hard as you possibly can to have no bet for the meeting. Because between a track bias that can change daily,extremely competitive racing,loads of foreign horses that are pure guesswork,and impossible handicaps,the place is a punting minefield.
|
|
By:
i dont use my own stats or do my own ratings, only use racing post RPR because they are the best in the business,
and the trainers i have highlighted above, will be watching out for the runners at the meeting, and try pick off few that might win at big odds, thats all. above stats are taken from my trainers flat statistics 2013. show the last 5 years of every trainer in great britain. i missed doing the york meeting stats, alan jarvis was + 16.00, his navjoe chief, would of been a glaringly easy bet to of found using the book, each to their own hey ![]() just beginning point to start off the studying for now. all comments are welcome goodluck |
|
By:
Each to their own road runner is quite right,i just think stats are a load of tosh as they can be twisted to suit any given argument. For example you could say that Tipperary have appeared in 3 of the last 4 all irelands giving them a 75% appearance rate,i could say they are 4 from 16 which makes it 25%.
|
|
By:
well im looking to improve my all around approach to finding winners, dont bet big money at the momnet, when
i do, every angle will be covered, sires, form, price, trainer stats. so much you can learn to find the good bets, know what you mean, dont like reading too much BS and h'cap marks all the time. more interested in present form and horse's that have beaten the selection or the grades of races, horse has been running in. simple ways to find winners, just look for the horses that have been winning recently, usually get hot streaks and rack up the wins, those are the profiles that are easy to spot. in order to improve, good to add different aspects to your studying. goodluck |
|
By:
just banged in a winner king of danes, mark johnstone +74.23 at goodwood last 5 years. adds gravitas too certain bets
![]() tipped that alchemist46 ![]() |
|
By:
u really ar a good un mate!! fookin hel,.,..!!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
as you say snap.a paralell universe!!
|
|
By:
you know where i tip, put up there 30 minutes ago, was easy bet to find.
![]() |
|
By:
az i said ur a good un mate,.,,,!!! keep up d gud stuff.,,.ders no stoppin d road runner and his notebook!! dats wer all de winnerz are hiding lads,...in road runnerz notebook..,..dey are v easy to find in ther as wel
|
|
By:
just read the form, your aussie rules beating paddy salentes is just not good enough my friend, by the way
i backed paddy salentes for both its wins last year, first win was 19.5 on machine ![]() |
|
By:
ur a class act man,..,, a real smooth opearator me thinkz!
|
|
By:
Havent noticed the road runner before to be honest, i wish i had .
|
|
By:
different gravy.
these threads are like porn....you know maybe you shouldn't but you can't help yourself looking........... |
|
By:
he is quality,...!! tom seagall and hugh tailor wudnt get a look in,...!!!
|
|
By:
did help that SAGEFORM on bloodstock and breeding forum, had highlighted dansili progeny at £80,000 their usually quality.
winner was a dansili, last piece of the puzzle. |
|
By:
Guy puts up a thread which hes entitled to, no need for the sarcastic comments.
|