To try and sort out the nonsense on here once and for all.
I would propose Vubiant, the voice of reason, as being ideal an ideal choice as Chief Arbitrator.
Before the hearing would be;
wildmanfromborneo vs never give up and wildmanfromborneo vs rocketfingers
I could be wrong but these feuds seem to be at the root of all the nonsense. If there are others, please propose them.
Both parties could make an opening statement summarising their greivances, face questioning by the Chief Arbitrator, cross examine the other and make a closing statement as directed by the Chief Arbitrator. Any evidence of a private nature could be submitted in private to Vubiant, for his assesment.
All parties would agree to be bound by the final decision of the Arbitrator and agree to move on and not regurgitate the nonsense thereafter.
Admittedly this would require a degree of effort and time but as the participants are on here discussing such matters on a daily basis, the time they would save in the long term would be massive.
Who knows it might even work? And it promises to be entertaining, something the current exchanges most certainly aren't. The alternative appears to be snipping in perpetuity.
Would the characters in question be willing to sign up to such a process?
To be fair to me, i never told an untruth on here and i've never started the sniping, if people don't want to believe that that's their agenda. I've always said if Sligo Rovers win the LOI i will retire soon afterwards for the foreseeable future. This will still be no help as you'll still chief sniper Wildmanfromborneo on here and he'll soon have a new target.
To be fair to me, i never told an untruth on here and i've never started the sniping, if people don't want to believe that that's their agenda. I've always said if Sligo Rovers win the LOI i will retire soon afterwards for the foreseeable future. Thi
Absolutely, I am not the man Kingrat. My station on here is barely above yours! Which is why I have proposed a format and a man to adjudicate, Judge Wapner style.
Absolutely, I am not the man Kingrat. My station on here is barely above yours! Which is why I have proposed a format and a man to adjudicate, Judge Wapner style.
I welcome the recommendation of Kelly as Chief Arbitrator. My only worry is that he might be a bit 'nice' for the job. It's a challenging role.
What say ye Borneo, are you willing to take the stand?
I welcome the recommendation of Kelly as Chief Arbitrator. My only worry is that he might be a bit 'nice' for the job. It's a challenging role.What say ye Borneo, are you willing to take the stand?