Carberry on the late late (bet with JP McManus)

douche bags

As it was probably a bet of 50,000-to-nothing he should have given it all to charity.

Why should he give any of it to charity? If any of the above had a big win i doubt they would give it to charity.

very mean shud have gave it all away to charity the man is loaded and jp helped him with his drink problem

Thats wright take charity but dont give to charity.

I would say the opposite is the case,i hope the charity he gave it to was the I.J.F.

Suppose it would be better than having it on Gay Mitchell at 8/1 or contributing to Danas election campaign.

yeah give it to them so they can give ruby 2 grand a week all summer while hes injured cause he needs it!

ya' havin' that one dave     08 Oct 11 10:36 
very mean shud have gave it all away to charity the man is loaded and jp helped him with his drink problem

you sure?

thats hes loaded or has a drink problem???

that he's loaded

yes shrewd investments in the north of england,and he didnt get wrapped up in the disaster that cost harrington geraghty clarkson etc fortunes

How common is it for legendary gamblers to hand prominent jockeys cheques for £50,000?

Maybe it's a one-off and totally above board. The cynic in me can't help but wonder.

[;)]

I am not surprised that by purpose would be aghast at a jockey getting any benefit as his pleasure is watching them get injured,he would be ideally suited to Roman times.
Blackwater i hadn`t looked on it that way but now agree that it doesn`t look good and makes Martin Scruff spring to mind.

again wildmug shows his ignorance hinting that martin scruff wasnt off u are some fool

Dave you should learn what the expression " wasn`t off" means,definitely not appropriate in the Martin Scruff case.

just like wonky u change ure mind every 2 sec gobdaw

Then again he could have laid Balmon Mist in Navan.Think the animal in question was refered to as a mongrel.Fancy you would be a fair judge of a mongrel wildman unless you have no mirror in the house.

Well why did you single out Martin scruff so ?,what relevance does that horse have ?

the man is a complete fool

Mincer i am surprised at you,surely you understand the term "wasn`t off" and why it definitely does not apply to the Martin Scruff case.

so why did u equate it to carberry gettin money u dope?

Can anyone explain what this person is talking about.

what chance have we got when he dont know himself what a moron [:D]

Now now children, run along and play somewhere else......

enter another gobsheen

See wildman,not that im going to bother getting involved,but rather admit that you are wrong here and have made a fool of yourself again,you will stick to a protracted argument and when you finally wear anybody who has engaged you down,then you will pronounce to all and sundry that you cleared all your adversaries away,and even your best friend that you have never met Inspector Wonks will chip in with a congratulatory post.Same old same old

See wildman,not that im going to bother getting involved,but rather admit that you are wrong here and have made a fool of yourself again,you will stick to a protracted argument and when you finally wear anybody who has engaged you down,then you will pronounce to all and sundry that you cleared all your adversaries away,and even your best friend that you have never met Inspector Wonks will chip in with a congratulatory post.Same old same old

Dave and by purpose a match made in heaven,neither of ye understand the nuances of language.
I am presuming Mincer gets it and why the term "wasn`t off"doesn`t apply.

Oh my god,as predicted.

u couldnt make this fool up

dave i wasnt on here in a few days and finally i get a day off.i was going through the various posts catching up and a few people were offering opinions and views etc.things that the forum is all about.a common theme of them all is your self coming on and calling them names or attacking them.have you no purpose only that?you seem to have no opinion or view on anything.the saying"empty vessels make most noise spring to mind"you attacked workrider for calling a mare "he".id say 90% of people refer to all horses as "he"..so please go away as you are of no help to us or yourself.

ya' havin' that one dave     07 Oct 11 13:57 
tipping up a hard puller that dont get home u'l blow ure dole money early this week


another deluded monkey where does it say anything bout mare or horse?

I would say there are only three people in the world who do not understand the term "wasn`t off" its just they strange that they are all here together.Mincer screaming like an American schoolgirl is also a new one.
I will try to explain later.

how can u explain it when u dont know the meaning u  thick

i will accept ure apology kavvie

IRISH FORUM AT ITS WORST AGAIN FFS EVERYONE NEEDS GET BACK TO BASICS

Watch out norn !

You may get on of these intelligent replies "enter another gobsheen" [:o]

lot of lads with no clue and other lads like kav that cant even read a post

theres always one at any one time.maybe its the same person..trade fair..dark rosaleen recently now dave.then they seem to dissapear into thin air..

There is a low attention span among the attack dogs and an inability to read or understand long posts.All the racing posters will understand that Blackwater made a very valid post with an excellent point,i responded citing the Martin Scruff case without making judgement,his post was about perception.Nobody i know that watched the Martin Scruff race used the words "not off" it was either an injudicious ride or stopped depending on your viewpoint.

its looking like the forum is going to be ruined by the same clowns every day .......kavvie no point getting involved here ..they'll only hunt you in packs.you're better off ignoring them ...i'll make a personal plea ..lads lets all pull together from this moment ..put personal agenda's aside till the n.h. season is finished..then if ye want we can continue with the childishness....but for now let this place be about sport ...PLEASE....

where is ure apology for a false accusation kav?

well said wonky

CM AFTR 2 BRAIN OPS I CUDNT GIV FLYN FEC JUST SADDENS ME THE IRISH FORUM IS LIKE PACK BITCHE$ AS NOT SO LONG AGO ITS WAS FIRST CLASS WITH SOME OF THE BEST FREE OPINIONS YOU COULD WISH READ BUT EVEN NOW I RARELY GET INVOLVED , AH WELL 1 CAN ONLY PRAY COMMON SENSE APPLIES ON HERE ASAP

as of now dave i wont reply or read anything you say.i just hope like a rash that you go away.i suggest all  worthwhile contributers do like wise and maybe the virus will dissapear.

u cant help ureself kav u made a mistake and arent man enough to admit it

i made one mistake so far today.and that was replying and reading your posts.i wont make any more in relation to you!!

you got the wrong man and u aint got the balls to hold ure hand up u sad little man

im 6ft and im def not sad!!..hold my hand up?!?!for what?go away

u stand by ure word by not posting lol u tool.false accusation u dont even remember 5 mins ago do u have a brain injury?

Kaavie, I've on idea why you are linking me to in house bitching on here. I post on things I have an opinion on. I don't jump from thread to thread attacking people.

Earlier in this thread Blackwater stated "How common is it for legendary gambler to hand prominent jockeys cheques for £50,000" I replied "Blackwater i hadn`t looked on it that way but now agree that it doesn`t look good,makes Martin Scruff spring to mind" this exchange prompted a barrage of posts from the usual crew who didn`t understand it,that in itself doesn`t bother me but the fact that no one else seemed to get the point did.Are all threads read in a desultory manner and does anyone remember the infamous Martin Scruff affair,also when some of the more reasoned posters came on they commented on the bickering but never made any reference to the original post.Maybe i expect too much of posters but there are some good ones.

Martin Scruff went off at around 1/2, IIRC.

PS my HAND is BREAKing

Was there not story doing the rounds with Martin Scruff that Carberry was taking the piss beating the 3rd on the bridle believing him to be leading the race. i.e he did not realise the eventual winner was in front of them both on the run in. A complete misjudgemet rather than anything to do with exchanges. That's what I believe happened anyway.

I actually agree with you Tradefair and i backed Martin Scruff but perception is important and Blackwaters point about a gambler handing over a fifty grand cheque is valid.I think there was around 400 grand traded on the race at nearly twos on the last thing you want is an association with a gambler and the jockey.
The biggest layer on the purple by a long way is a son of a legendary gambler which is why the purple won`t allow access to their accounts.

It's a strange one. I don't watch the Late Late but I can't think of a good reason to mention the bet in public. Mere mortals giving up drinking with aim of dealing with a problem not a 50k wedge. I'm sure plenty of cynics would say he's still drinking anyway.

no he aint drinking unless ya call red bull alcohol cause he drinks it flat out and no vodka in it

Hate the way we seem to applaud the whole jack the lad approach that he led, big laugh when he rode a horse into a pub sending women and children scattering for their safety, all well and good until the horse spooks and carnage ensues.
big laugh when he describes being so hungover that he could hardly see the fences, sad that someone would put himself and others lives/careers in jeopardy not to mention the damage he could have done to the horse.

without a doubt a talented jockey, just dont see why we should celebrate him acting the fool or being totally unprofessional by not being in a position give his all to his employer.

He was on the late late promoting his book which is coming out soon. The story of the 50k is in the book so was hardly giving anything away. He also said he asked JP's permission to put the story in the book. Im sure if there was anything dodgy or underhand about it all it wouldnt be made public in a book or on TV