|
By:
Would Walsh have been a beneficiary of IJF while out of action.The question i ask myself is why do jockeys need charity.If a blocklayer is out of action he can most likely sign on like most other professions.Why do the jockeys think they should benefit from charity.I suppose it would be handy for buying a new pair of Guccis.
|
|
By:
yes he would most cetainly be claiming ijf prob in england and ireland also
|
|
By:
I would rather set fire to money than contribute to IJF.
|
|
By:
"I’m not sure just how busy I will be at Listowel, but if I can get a ride then will definitely be there on Sunday
![]() |
|
By:
I have come across many a mean spirited post on here but By Purpose wins the watch,what warped twisted mind works that way.
|
|
By:
Explain why they are entitled to charity.
|
|
By:
better them gettin charity than benefits which you pay for anyway is it not? and not all are rich men like walsh you numpty.
|
|
By:
When ye two get around to answering the question let me know and by the way i sleep soundly at night regardless of what ye think of me.
|
|
By:
If you got an injury of any sort you would be the first into court roaring for compensation,these bravest of the brave are not well paid and they receive a token payment from the IJF.You can burn your money if you like no one is forced to contribute but its my favourite charity.Why does it upset you whether they receive payments or not? Its nothing got to do with people motivated by malice.
|