|
By:
r u enjoying it in aus kid
|
|
By:
Don`t tell me you`re only realizing that now?
A point. A Barca team playing 20 days after the World Cup final wouldn`t be much to write home about. |
|
By:
The FAI are probably worried that Barca might never come back to Ireland if the visit Limerick....
|
|
By:
I heard yesterday that Manchester United (graoevine job now) are coming to Dublin during the summer for a pre-season friendly but the FAI have decided that this match will NOT form part of the entitlements for anyone who bought the 10-year tickets.
|
|
By:
Really? Haha. One of the first games in the stadium isn't it.
I've heard it all now. What a shower of chancers. |
|
By:
as far as i'm aware the 10 year deals guaranteed tickets for all senior home internationals and the FAI Cup Final only,can't blame them for trying to make an extra buck in these straitened times and i'm sure the Glazers will be looking for a few bob to help pay off the debt
|
|
By:
With the prices they're charging you'd think they'd show some loyalty in the way of a thank you to the small number of buyers of those tickets. Not everything should be about squeezing every cent possibly out of everyone's pockets at every possible opportunity. The game won't be sold out for a start.
|
|
By:
Customer loyalty will be key in forthcoming years.
This is a [:x] big wig mistake. |
|
By:
don't agree Fagan,the financial success of the stadium for the FAI is tied up in the fortunes of the national team,if they are competitive and get lucky in draws for qualifying groups etc then the fans will turn up if they are gank then ...
|
|
By:
Delaney and his donkeys would be better off rewarding those block bookers from Croke Park instead of cutting their allocations.
Many many strange decisions from this strange strange organisation. Although I agree the olé olérs will reappear if the long baller has some success. |
|
By:
I agree with you thats from a derry city fan :D
|
|
By:
Yeah havin a great laugh over here in oz.. Who are you. how do you know where i am.? i'm freaked out
|
|
By:
Apparently this thing of a "3rd party agreement" is a total sham. It doesn't exist allegedly. Richard Sadlier made the point earlier that this money could keep a club like Limerick going for a couple of seasons or more. They are a disgrace but what do you expect from the fools and idiots.
|
|
By:
Limerick have confirmed that the proposed friendly with Barcelona will not be going ahead.
Limerick had attempted to arrange a friendly with Barcelona on 31 July; however, the club have received confirmation in writing from Barcelona that the game will not go ahead. Limerick released a statement to the media that read: 'It is with regret that Limerick FC wish to confirm that FC Barcelona have confirmed in writing to the club this evening, Tuesday May 18th, that they are no longer in the position to keep open the agreed date of July 31st for the proposed friendly match in Thomond Park.' The statement continued: 'Therefore the proposed friendly match between both clubs will not now go ahead despite the fact that a heads of agreement had been reached between both parties. 'Limerick FC have been informed by FC Barcelona that the only reason that this match is not going ahead is the decision of the Airtricity League Director & the FAI not to sanction the proposed match. 'The initial decision of Airtricity League Director & the FAI was not changed despite an email request by FC Barcelona to FAI officials on the night of Monday 17th May that confirmed their desire to go ahead with the match with Limerick FC and stated their disagreement with the decision not to sanction the game. 'Due to FC Barcelona's need to finalise their pre season plans for the upcoming season, they are now left with no choice but to seek an alternative friendly match for the date in question. 'Limerick FC respect FC Barcelona's need to do this and hope they find a suitable alternative fixture.' I dont follow the LOI much but wat would be the reason for not allowing this game? One of the stupidest decisions ever made imo |
|
By:
The FAI are **** up arists.
Apparently it can't go ahead because the FAI have signed an agreement with a "3rd party" not to sanction any friendly with a capacity over a certain number. This number changes depending on which day of the week it is. The FAI won't name the 3rd party. The FAI never informed clubs of this restriction. So basically the FAI have cut off potentially life saving avenues of revenue to clubs, with a 3rd party they cant name, for a capacity they can't cite, without even informing clubs of this until a club came along and asked for the ok for a game. The FAI had absolutely no right to cut off revenue to clubs like that, the fact they didn't consult the clubs makes it 100 times worse. There is something so repugnant and wrong about the organisation. Everything they touch turns to ****. But what do you expect? |
|
By:
10 times more people play football than boghockey & bigotball combined- the FAI deserve immense credit for that-for all the criticism thats their true success- for all the praise on here for the GGA people conveiently forget less tha 1000 adults dubs play stickhurling
|
|
By:
FAI are just a shower of inept chancers. On a slightly diifferent point, IRFU are wondering what they ever done to deserve to end up with clueless, near bankrupt partners, in a new stadium that is way too small for their needs. Ever notice how embarrassed IRFU CE Philip Browne looks when standing beside the fool, chief bluffer, Delaney when they are doing a joint interview.
|
|
By:
Well said Ricky, its unbelievable the shi7 they get away with. Wouldn't happen in any other country in the world. Fact.
|
|
By:
Wouldn't happen in any other country in the world. Fact.
You an expert in worldwide football associations? I detest the FAI because they are constantly on my clubs back, and are a completely and utterly inept organisation, but thats a ridiculous statement. They are very self serving, but I`d imagine there are far more corrupt footballing bodies across the globe than the FAI. |
|
By:
tubsy1916 - can you drop the 1916 from your name because you obviously were not born then and with your "views" this does not make sense!
just call yourself "fat pr1ck" |
|
By:
Correspondence between FAI and The Irish Independent
Thursday May 20 2010 The Irish Independent received correspondence from Peter Sherrard, the FAI’s Director of Communications , yesterday regarding aspects of our coverage of recent events. Here were produce - and address - the points he raises in full Dear Sirs We refer to a number of articles published in your newspaper between May 13 and May 19 written by Daniel McDonnell pertaining to the FAI. For the record, the FAI wish to point out our ever-increasing concern regarding the one-sided journalistic approach taken by Daniel McDonnell in relation to our Association, particularly in recent days. It is clear to us that Daniel McDonnell has been engaging in an ongoing campaign against the FAI without full knowledge of the facts behind many of the comments and stories he has written. As you are no doubt aware this flies in the face of the Code of Practice for Newspapers, in particular Principle 1 'Truth and Accuracy' and Principle 2 'Distinguishing Fact and Comment'. His articles are clearly indicative of someone who fails to check his facts, fails to correctly read or check FAI statements and generally presents comment from third parties without checking the claims made by his sources. We specifically point out the following examples; Article Friday, May 14 'FAI 'No' to Barca' In paragraph six he states; 'It also emerged that the FAI have been in ongoing negotiations with Barcelona about a friendly game since April, although they deny it is a factor in the Limerick Verdict' FAI responds: An FAI statement was released on Thursday, May 13, clearly setting out the reasons surrounding the decision by the FAI not to grant authorisation to Limerick FC for the proposed fixture. One of the reasons set out related to ongoing negotiations by the FAI with FC Barcelona. Despite this fact, Daniel McDonnell ignores it and proceeded to suggest an FAI denial of something we already had on record. Daniel McDonnell responds: Certainly, there is something to clear up here. The intention was to stress that the negotiations with Barcelona are not the main factor, rather than suggesting that the FAI intended to say they weren't 'a factor' at all. When asked directly over the weekend about the reason the game wasn't going ahead, FAI CEO John Delaney firstly cited the third party commercial agreement, and this was the main reason offered by Peter Sherrard when contacted on Thursday evening when the story first broke. The negotiations with Barcelona were stressed as a secondary concern. So, we are happy to clarify the fact that the FAI were in competition with one of their financially strapped clubs for a glamour friendly with Barcelona, and this is one of the reasons why they refused to sanction the Limerick game. It is important this is kept on the record. Article Saturday, May 15 'Limerick not giving up on Barca date' In paragraph four of his article on Saturday, Daniel McDonnell further promulgates the position that Limerick FC were not advised by the FAI of the reasons for the refusal of permission for this fixture. He states; 'As of last night, the only official explanation they have received from the FAI is the email which states that the game cannot go ahead because it clashes with League of Ireland fixtures.' FAI responds: Again his reporting is incorrect as the FAI statement released on Thursday, May 13, clearly outlines the FAI position. Furthermore, he never contacted the FAI for comment in relation to this claim from Limerick FC. If he had, he would have been advised that Limerick FC were in receipt of other correspondence confirming the reasons for the non- authorisation of the fixture. Daniel McDonnell responds: The paragraph in question related to official correspondence and asserted that the only formal statement Limerick FC had from the FAI -- to pass onto Barcelona, for example -- was an email from Airtricity League Director, Fran Gavin, stressing that the July 31 date was a problem because of a clash with league fixtures that day and the subsequent knock-on effect for the calendar. It was only on Sunday morning that FAI CEO John Delaney, who refused to speak about the matter two days earlier, added that Head of League Marketing and Promotion Noel Mooney had travelled to Limerick on Thursday morning, although he later added that it was only part of a meeting to arrange a gathering in Dublin yesterday pertaining to general issues surrounding football in the Shannonside area. This information was not included in the FAI statement on Thursday evening. The Irish Independent also contests that the statement released on Thursday, May 13, 'clearly' outlines the FAI position. It notes the subsequent appearance by Mr Delaney on the 'Marian Finucane Show' on Sunday which threw up more questions; the statements from Peter Sherrard on Sunday evening and Monday morning related to the capacity referred to in the third party agreement; and then a further 10-point statement from the FAI later that evening, which surely wouldn't have been necessary if the statement on Thursday had cleared things up in a satisfactory manner. Indeed, arguably the most worrying part of this episode, with respect to 'accuracy' is that Mr Sherrard briefed journalists erroneous details about the capacity limit in the third party commercial agreement. The figure of 20,000 was reported in a number of outlets, before the subsequent clarification to a figure of 15,000 which was extremely significant in the context of a venue the size of Thomond Park. Article Monday, May 17 ' Same old raw deal for the clubs as FAI look after No. 1' In paragraph nine of this article he states; 'The fact that this year's summer training camp is taking place in Malahide? Money.' FAI responds: The FAI has already stated on the record that the decision to stay in Malahide this year was not a financial decision as we were already offered accommodation free of charge for the squad in two southern European destinations. Again Daniel McDonnell is making insinuations regarding decisions made by the FAI without reference to the FAI stated position on this matter. Daniel McDonnell responds: Giovanni Trapattoni made it perfectly clear in March that his preference for this summer would be a 'warm' weather training camp similar to the opening gathering in the Algarve two years ago. He mentioned Corsica or Sardinia as possible venues but, after the friendly match with Brazil in London in March, indicated that it was standard practice for the Association to be invited by a third party -- such as the Oceanico organised soiree in the Algarve two years ago. The FAI statement above relates to free accommodation, but none of the other costs, such as flights and logistics, which would be associated with such a week-long trip abroad. If the FAI wish to clarify that they went against the stated preference of the international manager and organised a training camp in a location different to his 'on the record' ideal scenario for reasons nothing to do with money, then we are happy to put that statement out there and let the readers draw their own conclusions. In the fifth last paragraph he states; 'Indeed, despite Delaney's denials, it was reported over the weekend that Bohs were told as much when they made a tentative enquiry to Abbotstown regarding the possibility of a game with Barca.' FAI responds: This is reported despite the fact the FAI had already made clear, on the record, that no request was made by Bohemian FC to the FAI in relation to a friendly with Barcelona FC and furthermore Bohemian FC has confirmed this. Daniel McDonnell responds: It is important to put the segment quoted above in context. The highlighted sentence was preceded by the line, "What Delaney is saying is that if another League of Ireland club goes out tomorrow, and has the initiative to agree a deal with Barcelona or Real Madrid or Manchester United for a game at a decent sized venue, they are wasting their time." Nowhere is it suggested that Bohs were far enough down the line to make an official request to the FAI with respect to a friendly with Barcelona. They unofficially queried if it would be possible to arrange a game and they were told 'no way'. This was reported accurately by a rival publication. In other words, they would have been 'wasting their time'. It appears that the FAI are unable to draw the distinction between a 'tentative enquiry' and an 'official request'. The statement from the FAI on Monday night said, "It was suggested in one newspaper that the FAI declined a request from Bohemian FC to play FC Barcelona. This is not true and the club have confirmed that." We are unsure where this was suggested, but it certainly wasn't in the Irish Independent. Bohemian FC have no issue with what appeared in our newspaper. Article Tuesday, May 18 'Standing Together' Under the heading 'Spiralling' paragraph one, he states; 'And what if Bohs are drawn away for the second leg of a Champions League third-round qualifier, the biggest domestic football game in years, while the FAI are wining and dining at their grand opening in Dublin.' FAI responds: Daniel McDonnell has made a wide sweeping assumption unreflective of the facts around this qualifier. The FAI will be providing financial and logistical support to Bohemians (and any other club in European competition) during their European campaign and will be supported by FAI personnel at all stages during this competition. His insinuation that all the FAI are doing is 'wining and dining' at the first match in the Stadium is far from fact. We trust you will note this catalogue of one-sided reporting which gives your readers an unbalanced and poorly informed viewpoint. Yours faithfully, Peter Sherrard, Fai Director of Communications Daniel McDonnell responds: Nowhere is it stated that 'all' the FAI will be doing on August 4 will be wining and dining during the visit of Manchester United to Lansdowne Road Stadium. However, after an extensive tour of the new venue last Friday, which included the facilities for VIP and invited guests, it appears safe to point out that these amenities will be utilised for the game in question. It would be a surprise if the FAI did not invite a selection of dignitaries to the first soccer match at their new home. The provision of financial and logistical support to Bohemians is welcomed. Indeed, John Delaney said last Friday that he had engaged 'in preliminary discussions with UEFA' with a view to moving the Bohemians game if a clash occurred in Dublin. This was before he had spoken to Bohemian FC on the matter. On Monday, in a press briefing, Mr Sherrard said he wasn't aware that Mr Delaney had spoken to UEFA. Either way, Bohemians manager Pat Fenlon has stated a preference to play the game on the designated date even if a clash arises. It is remarkable that the FAI are trying to put a positive spin on organising a match involving a global power on the week that Irish clubs could be representing the domestic game in the highest level of club competition -- either home or abroad -- and desperately need the exposure which accompanies such events. The prospect of an embarrassing clash between the two events remains entirely possible. Irish Independent |
|
By:
Its a joke as simple as, the FAI are a bunch of clowns!
If the likes of tubby could remove his head from up his own h0le for a minute he could see this, but he'd rather continue with his tiresome fishing efforts. If he were a real fan of Irish Soccer he'd be up in arms about this. |
|
By:
To be fair the Irish Indo have tried to send up the FAI here with this stunt. No doubt about it but the FAI's argument is weak but so is some of the responses from the Indo's writer esp the last. Let's have a balanced talk about this, not slagging each other. The Indo really shows itself up as being nothing but a rag and a media lap dog of the main right wing groups in this country the Church+Fianna Fail+GAA with all 3 being linked so closely to one another.
Saying all that the FAI should have let Limerick host it's game as i doubt it would have come off. |
|
By:
I'd be really really embarrassed if I sent that letter to the newspaper and I'd be seriously worried if anything the FAI did mattered to me. I needed a good laugh today.
|
|
By:
[i]Wouldn't happen in any other country in the world. Fact.
You an expert in worldwide football associations? I detest the FAI because they are constantly on my clubs back, and are a completely and utterly inept organisation, but thats a ridiculous statement. They are very self serving, but I`d imagine there are far more corrupt footballing bodies across the globe than the FAI. It is a fact that the FAI are the only football association not to sanction a game with barcelona after they had agreed to the game. U muppet. |
|
By:
Thanks for that reply. I now know you think I`m a muppet however, I still don`t know how your statement is a fact.
|
|
By:
delaney is the new alan partridge
|
|
By:
This 3rd party agency that the FAI have appointed to handle friendlies ..... please tell me this agency is in no way connected with anyone in the FAI, their families, relatives, friends, and such such. Why is it a mystery? What is in it for the FAI? The FAI have staff. Why don't they organise the fixtures themselves?
|
|
By:
I think Alan Partridge is less conceited.
|
|
By:
ah ha.
|