|
By:
Gone I reckon
|
|
By:
Has to go
|
|
By:
The second is a hound though.
|
|
By:
probably lose it but there is an argument he was clear of the 2nd when he went across it so 1.2 seems a bit skinny for a reversal
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
nose dist after causing the 2nd to check...minimal interference but enough to reverse imo
|
|
By:
winners drifted across 2nd..jock on 2nd had to put whip down and steer around..deffo cost it more than a nose so cert to go.
|
|
By:
I reckon it keeps it. The second had to change course, but the fav was a worthy winner. I didn't back the winner, I layed it and cashed out in the photo, thinking it had indeed prevailed. I cannot believe that the runner up was trading so short.
|
|
By:
uptheirons 21 Oct 26 15:44
The second is a hound though. what relevance has that got to do with it? ![]() |
|
By:
Because it could be argued that the ponce wouldn't pass water perhaps
|
|
By:
asparagus 21 Oct 26 15:46
probably lose it but there is an argument he was clear of the 2nd when he went across it jock on 2nd had to put whip down and steer around. |
|
By:
If it doesn't get reversed they have zero credibility. Beaten a nose and closing at the line.
|
|
By:
I thought he practically bumped him
|
|
By:
super market sweep
|
|
By:
Hoover in maximum use
![]() |
|
By:
Amended Result
|
|
By:
Not reversing that would set a very dangerous precedent.
|
|
By:
uptheirons 21 Oct 26 15:44
The second is a hound though. still pmsl. |
|
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps • October 21, 2026 3:50 PM BST
winners drifted across 2nd..jock on 2nd had to put whip down and steer around..deffo cost it more than a nose so cert to go. well done Rico. |
|
By:
Stewards got it right maintaining their 10% strike rate of correct decisions.
|
|
By:
steadmen keeps banging on about painful for fav backers,losing the race,how many backers % wise wont have been paid out on double result or got out of any bet at some stage on exchanges ?
almost certainly more pain inflicted ob punters by steadmen treating every race as though its THE DERBY or a group one |
|
By:
Steadman is and always has been,a motormouthed,clueless Sweaty
|
|
By:
if that was a world pool race I favour a stands
![]() |
|
By:
uptheirons 21 Oct 26 16:07
Steadman is and always has been,a motormouthed,clueless Sweaty Grrrrrr |
|
By:
uptheirons 21 Oct 26 15:44
The second is a hound though. uptheirons 21 Oct 26 16:07 Steadman is and always has been,a motormouthed,clueless Sweaty you're likewise innit? |
|
By:
Ironhead is a mouth from a distance……
|
|
By:
You can accuse me of many things but,a Sweaty
![]() |
|
By:
And,here appears the utterly clueless Aceform who thinks that Ollie Murphy is Skeltons equal
![]() |
|
By:
I never said equal Iron Age,much of a muchness….promising for decades winning handicap material…
|
|
By:
uptheirons 21 Oct 26 15:44
The second is a hound though. uptheirons 21 Oct 26 16:18 And,here appears the utterly clueless Aceform accusing someone of being clueless? bit ironic innit? |
|
By:
Do you never tire of blowing your own trumpet,Rico?
|
|
By:
where am i doing that? im showing ewe up for the absolute fckn tatey that ewe are...capiche?
|
|
By:
uptheirons 21 Oct 26 15:44
The second is a hound though. LOL |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
The second is without doubt a hound,unless you want to correct me.
A decent Jockey on the winner would have made that case in the Stewards. Such is life |
|
By:
hound or not has no relevance in a stewards inquiry ya silleekhúnt.
|
|
By:
That would be a no then?
|
|
By:
😆
|
|
By:
You are betting on the Stewards opinions not the Ten Commandments.
They can and do make poor decisions. You got your fingers burned at Ripon,if you remember and it didn't help you that you were right,did it? |