There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
put 0-65 on the racecard but look up the winner of Yarmouth first race and they don't put 0-75 for it's last race at Goodwood in the results. Yes you've got the individual ratings of the runners but why leave out the 0-75 ?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 12
|
By:
6f Constant Security Serving Yorkshire Racecourses Nursery Handicap (Class 5) (2yo 0-75)
£8,000 guaranteed For 2yo Rated 0-75 mentions 0-75 twice won't be in the results |
|
By:
rp are imbeciles howie
|
|
By:
I'd noticed this.
|
|
By:
glad I have never paid them anything. Can't be something those that do are bothered about.
|
|
By:
If you can find (or if someone can supply) the RP CS email address, try asking them. They might change it back. They might not realise they've dropped it in the first place.
|
|
By:
https://help.racingpost.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
|
|
By:
Idon't see the point of putting the breeders name in the results
|
|
By:
Mick Sturbs -- the breeding industry buys a lot of advertising in the Racing Post. HTH.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
My big beef is the lack of prize money details in the RP results. They seem to keep making changes for the sake of it. Go back 12 months please.
|
|
By:
I wrote to the RP about this. A few weesk ago, in any individual line of form for any horse that had run in a handicap the band of the handicap had gone missing.
IE; you click on a horse and then click on it's last run in a handicap. The race that then opens is now missing whether it was a 0-75 or a 0-80 etc etc. A rather critical bit of the form puzzle. The RP wrote back saying they knew it was now missing but it would be restored on the next software upgrade in September. It is now October 5th and it has still not been done. The RP made such a mess of the recent change to the racecards that they are still finding out what went wrong. Truly useless! |
|
By:
The Knight and Howard, well done for contacting the Racing Post about this inconvenience, I have also sent an e-mail highlighting this wee problem. cheers.
|