There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
put 0-65 on the racecard but look up the winner of Yarmouth first race and they don't put 0-75 for it's last race at Goodwood in the results. Yes you've got the individual ratings of the runners but why leave out the 0-75 ?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 15
|
By:
6f Constant Security Serving Yorkshire Racecourses Nursery Handicap (Class 5) (2yo 0-75)
£8,000 guaranteed For 2yo Rated 0-75 mentions 0-75 twice won't be in the results |
|
By:
rp are imbeciles howie
|
|
By:
I'd noticed this.
|
|
By:
glad I have never paid them anything. Can't be something those that do are bothered about.
|
|
By:
If you can find (or if someone can supply) the RP CS email address, try asking them. They might change it back. They might not realise they've dropped it in the first place.
|
|
By:
https://help.racingpost.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
|
|
By:
Idon't see the point of putting the breeders name in the results
|
|
By:
Mick Sturbs -- the breeding industry buys a lot of advertising in the Racing Post. HTH.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
My big beef is the lack of prize money details in the RP results. They seem to keep making changes for the sake of it. Go back 12 months please.
|
|
By:
I wrote to the RP about this. A few weesk ago, in any individual line of form for any horse that had run in a handicap the band of the handicap had gone missing.
IE; you click on a horse and then click on it's last run in a handicap. The race that then opens is now missing whether it was a 0-75 or a 0-80 etc etc. A rather critical bit of the form puzzle. The RP wrote back saying they knew it was now missing but it would be restored on the next software upgrade in September. It is now October 5th and it has still not been done. The RP made such a mess of the recent change to the racecards that they are still finding out what went wrong. Truly useless! |
|
By:
The Knight and Howard, well done for contacting the Racing Post about this inconvenience, I have also sent an e-mail highlighting this wee problem. cheers.
|
|
By:
now we need betfair to delete massively incorrect jockey silks before a race starts. OK you won't have the correct colours but it will draw your attention.
|
|
By:
Terry Norman
@tjnnorman The Racing Post going up to £599 for a year's subscription is bordering on the biggest joke of the year. Still no grades on the results and very little has been improved since the disastrous upgrade. tone deaf |
|
By:
Racingpost.com have stripped quite a few things out of their Race and Form Displays, with the latest 'Upgrade', a few months ago.
It has thus become far more apparent to Desktop Computer and Laptop users - as the 'stripping out' (in order to narrow Displays) is patently obviously done because the Racing Post emphasis (and now quite probably only emphasis) is to accommodate Mobile PHONE users ... at the detriment to Computer and Laptop users. It is complete DUMBING DOWN - and just who thinks that they can SERIOUSLY study FORM off a small PHONE Screen - by/with continually having to Scroll up and down (thus Not encapsulating a WHOLE Racecard or Horse's Lifetime Form in ONE Field of vision - is beyond me. I would be Laying such INADEQUATE Punters selections 'All day long'. |