There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Some of these photos you cant possibly pick the the winner, we're talking a nostril at times the that close even the guys on the panel cant separate them , but the betting is showing 1.01 and sometimes you cant even get that , I find it amusing when one of the panel guys says its impossible to call but the betting is showing 1.01 -100/1. Am I blind or does someone have access to seeing the print? at one time you could get fair prices on the photo betting now its just laughable.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 31
|
By:
dohh
|
|
By:
Rewind button
|
|
By:
Disagree you still wouldn't back 1.01 1,02 at worse they should be 1.2
|
|
By:
Why not Lay then,WBA?
|
|
By:
Not bad judge myself but the prices you're getting now its as if they know the result.
|
|
By:
They are never wrong uptheirons
|
|
By:
I agree, that one at Hamilton just now, no way could I have made the winner 1.01 on the rtv feed.
One of them, it was so short you assume someone must have an advantage, so I don't participate. |
|
By:
Rico is very good on photos surely he must be feeling it.
|
|
By:
Cider couldn't believe it myself, but it is everyday now.
|
|
By:
Probably based on the angle and the true line. But it still requires iron balls when it appears there's a pixel in it.
|
|
By:
cos every quid is a task these days..i said to a mate that race at Hamilton its won an inch and unbackable..thats the way it is now.
|
|
By:
photos always been my earner..but you can only win a decent amount if they have won an inch and wide apart..ie need to use judgement.
|
|
By:
im very very cautious these days as only takes a big loss on a foto then a stewards to wipe a month out.
|
|
By:
It's tighter than in the past, but add in the risk of inquiries you'd need your bumps felt betting 1/50 on something like that. It's only going to end up one way, and that's not positive!
|
|
By:
Surely the GPS software plays a big part? I notice a big change about 8 months ago.
|
|
By:
I don't feel like the result is known, but perhaps angles or footage not broadcast.
|
|
By:
GPS can't 'know' where their noses are.
|
|
By:
The GPS is in the saddle isn't it,so how can that help?
|
|
By:
there was a photo yesterday where the runners saddle was in front of the winners..winner was still very short..obv different size horses mean the pgs could be behind the second as yesterday.
|
|
By:
My hypothesis is a close up slo mo, captured but ordinarily not broadcast on rtv
|
|
By:
there was a photo yesterday where the runner ups saddle was in front of the winners..winner was still very short..obv different size horses mean the pgs could be behind the second as yesterday.
|
|
By:
Fairpoint, just feels kind of automated.
|
|
By:
in running certainly is..photos looks that way.
|
|
By:
I've had similar conclusions, but it's not every track/photo. If it looks a relative coinflip, but the market suggests it's obvious, I don't play.
|
|
By:
im suprised havent pulled betting on photos..cant see how they can be beating people.
|
|
By:
BF can stand the odd small losses but get it back with unexpected Stewards like Bumper at Navan yesterday
|
|
By:
only if winner is disq..want yest.
|
|
By:
In all fairness betting on the stewards feels fair as I'm betting against other peoples opinions, as for the photos doesn't feel the same anymore.
|
|
By:
you're 95% betting against the paddibot.
|
|
By:
I totally agree Hugo , sometimes you just like to ere it from others to convince yourself you're not going mad.
|
|
By:
I wish anybody the very best of luck betting on Paddywhacker Stewards,because you will need it over time
|