apologies slicks f/cas t was available around 1.39-40 b4 off ........rico out on his own on the podium ............forever to be addressed as sir rico from now on !
apologies slicks f/cas t was available around 1.39-40 b4 off ........rico out on his own on the podium ............forever to be addressed as sir rico from now on !
The simplest of bet editing opportunities ever for bongobullshatter, Backs for whatever pre race and lays for the same pre race,involving a small loss or gain whatever the outcome,then delete the losing part. Wait until 5.07 to post the aftertime claim and later show the profit. BINGO
The simplest of bet editing opportunities ever for bongobullshatter,Backs for whatever pre race and lays for the same pre race,involving a small loss or gain whatever the outcome,then delete the losing part.Wait until 5.07 to post the aftertime claim
Just proves one thing without fast pics or drones worse than than Pandy and that's saying something!! Pity there's no PPI claim for fast pics and drones, biggest scandal ever BF allowing that
Just proves one thing without fast pics or drones worse than than Pandy and that's saying something!! Pity there's no PPI claim for fast pics and drones, biggest scandal ever BF allowing that
Loads of cons everyday doesn't mean it right. When in running first came out I knew of at least 10 people who did their conkers not realizing there was a delay.
The small sentence to cover it, not many young naive punters would ever read. I emailed saying for your first 5 bets it should of come up with a message telling you about the delay and not place your bet and if you placed your 6th bet it would do it with the 1 or 2 sec delay and then it would of been fair play, never got a reply.
Loads of cons everyday doesn't mean it right. When in running first came out I knew of at least 10 people who did their conkers not realizing there was a delay.The small sentence to cover it, not many young naive punters would ever read. I emailed sa
richgit Joined: 13 Feb 02 ....Agreed he's made his fortune by foul means,..
i sourced the live feed info/dish in 2005 on my own i used sis i used sis hacked codes for live feed i used facetime i sourced racecourse offices
nothing anyone could have done if they made an effort.
richgit Joined: 13 Feb 02 ....Agreed he's made his fortune by foul means,.. i sourced the live feed info/dish in 2005 on my owni used sis i used sis hacked codes for live feedi used facetimei sourced racecourse officesnothing anyone could have done i
Rico the potless wonder.A.k.a The biggest loser ever (forever) Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh Cheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese.
When you thought lightening couldn't strike twice the potless wonder appears.
Couldn't have happened to a nicer lad ;).
Oh Cheese!
Rico the potless wonder.A.k.a The biggest loser ever (forever)Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh Cheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese.When you thought lightening couldn't strike twice the potless wonder appears.Couldn't have happened to a nicer lad ;).Oh Cheese!
Once again thanks you guys for lumping on that dodgy fav who i heard BEFORE the race did a bad gallop a week ago ......i guess he was "value" hehe anyway , just had a lovely meal all the trimmings , entertaining a few ladies tonight and made a large donation to the local animal rescue so just know your hard earned will do some good in the end, thank you all again , bingo
Once again thanks you guys for lumping on that dodgy fav who i heard BEFORE the race did a bad gallop a week ago ......i guess he was "value" hehe anyway , just had a lovely meal all the trimmings , entertaining a few ladies tonight and made a large
that was THE easiest lay bet i have ever done , was able to lay it solidly for peanuts to win a small fortune the way i like it , wow i was shouting home the footballer owned horse
that was THE easiest lay bet i have ever done , was able to lay it solidly for peanuts to win a small fortune the way i like it , wow i was shouting home the footballer owned horse
Rico doesn't like my use of the phrase " foul means " for his winnings...in mitigation he says .." I used SIS HACKED codes for the feed "........oh, apologies from me then in that case !
Rico doesn't like my use of the phrase " foul means " for his winnings...in mitigation he says .." I used SIS HACKED codes for the feed "........oh, apologies from me then in that case !
There was an example yesterday of a really long odds-on shot getting beat yesterday. 1/33 SP. Odds of 1.07 were available on Betfair. Some gamblers thought this Betfair price was value. These gamblers have capital behind them and at that price the stakes must have been high. It was a three horse race. Is there anything as senseless as this when National savings Bonds are available and ISAs? Short answer: Yes, — backing a 1/33 SP horse at 1.07 on Betfair in a three‑runner race is one of the most senseless uses of capital you’ll ever see in gambling. When safe, government‑backed instruments like NS&I and ISAs exist, the comparison becomes almost comically stark.
But the deeper point is why intelligent, well‑capitalised gamblers still do it — and why it’s structurally irrational even before you compare it to savings products.
Co-Pilot's view:There was an example yesterday of a really long odds-on shot getting beat yesterday. 1/33 SP. Odds of 1.07 were available on Betfair. Some gamblers thought this Betfair price was value. These gamblers have capital behind them and at t
There was an example yesterday of a really long odds-on shot getting beat yesterday. 1/33 SP. Odds of 1.07 were available on Betfair. Some gamblers thought this Betfair price was value. These gamblers have capital behind them and at that price the stakes must have been high. It was a three horse race. Is there anything as senseless as this when National savings Bonds are available and ISAs? Short answer: Yes, Paul — backing a 1/33 SP horse at 1.07 on Betfair in a three‑runner race is one of the most senseless uses of capital you’ll ever see in gambling. When safe, government‑backed instruments like NS&I and ISAs exist, the comparison becomes almost comically stark.
But the deeper point is why intelligent, well‑capitalised gamblers still do it — and why it’s structurally irrational even before you compare it to savings products. 1. The core absurdity: the risk–reward ratio is broken Let’s quantify it cleanly.
Backing at 1.07 Stake: £100,000 (typical for syndicates)
Profit if it wins: £7,000
Loss if it loses: £100,000
True probability of a 1/33 SP horse losing Even elite odds‑on shots get beaten:
Falls
Refuses
Hampered
Misjudged pace
Jockey error
Tactical mess in small fields
The real probability of defeat is far higher than the implied 7% margin the backer is “earning”.
If the true chance of losing is even 2%, the expected value collapses:
There was an example yesterday of a really long odds-on shot getting beat yesterday. 1/33 SP. Odds of 1.07 were available on Betfair. Some gamblers thought this Betfair price was value. These gamblers have capital behind them and at that price the st
There was an example yesterday of a really long odds-on shot getting beat yesterday. 1/33 SP. Odds of 1.07 were available on Betfair. Some gamblers thought this Betfair price was value. These gamblers have capital behind them and at that price the stakes must have been high. It was a three horse race. Is there anything as senseless as this when National savings Bonds are available and ISAs? Short answer: Yes, Paul — backing a 1/33 SP horse at 1.07 on Betfair in a three‑runner race is one of the most senseless uses of capital you’ll ever see in gambling. When safe, government‑backed instruments like NS&I and ISAs exist, the comparison becomes almost comically stark.
But the deeper point is why intelligent, well‑capitalised gamblers still do it — and why it’s structurally irrational even before you compare it to savings products.
There was an example yesterday of a really long odds-on shot getting beat yesterday. 1/33 SP. Odds of 1.07 were available on Betfair. Some gamblers thought this Betfair price was value. These gamblers have capital behind them and at that price the st
it did look "free money" but as said you would have to be a high roller to back it and you wouldnt want to oppose it for high stakes ,most of these very long odds on shots win hence the record sp of this one , backers of these "certs" and that is what they are most of the time get into a comfort zone ,its like finding it on the street and the more that win the more comfortable it gets backing em they expect to win it is rare to lose , most punters cannot see past the 1st 2 in the betting especially in the non handicaps ,rico may have made loads in the past on in running when the odds were massivly on his side with fast pics live feeds drones or whatever i respect him for that he got off his arris and exploited it while most were to slow or me included didnt have the know how, the game has changed the bots/ technology or whatever have caught up and closed the avenues but you can get used to playing very short prices and its difficult change the habit . what is value ? when a price is bigger than you think it should be but is your opinion on the price being too big correct ?
it did look "free money" but as said you would have to be a high roller to back it and you wouldnt want to oppose it for high stakes ,most of these very long odds on shots win hence the record sp of this one , backers of these "certs" and that is wha
Frico the OP has a lot of previous for this type of "cert" "full bank" etc. From memory he got sharona 100s in a 3 horse (lay) to actually win, field of gold 1st 3 1.06, ombudsman 1st 3 1.06, what a girl wants 1st 3 1.06, and now najiri storm 1.06 1.07 ALL stuffed into oblivion. Money tree would be proud. But not even he could have done this. Frico claims to be 3.3 up lol. How? Fast feeds and drones many years ago. It's certainly not racing knowledge as he has proven on several occasions that he is gullible naive and clueless. He THIEVED this loot. Should be locked up. Likes to invent porkies as well. Great for a laugh though. My name is frico I am a prico At half past 4 I go for a nap At half past 5 I go for a **** .
Frico the OP has a lot of previous for this type of "cert" "full bank" etc. From memory he got sharona 100s in a 3 horse (lay) to actually win, field of gold 1st 3 1.06, ombudsman 1st 3 1.06, what a girl wants 1st 3 1.06, and now najiri storm 1.06 1.
It's obvious in hindsight but giving 7lbs away. Practically heavy ground. Jockey totally useless. How freaky thought it was "value" at 1.07 defies belief. Of course it still should have won (I did the forecast ), but value it was not. Fricoco the clown is all washed up. A proven proper clown.
It's obvious in hindsight but giving 7lbs away. Practically heavy ground. Jockey totally useless. How freaky thought it was "value" at 1.07 defies belief. Of course it still should have won (I did the forecast ), but value it was not. Fricoco the clo
...I wouldn't agree that "he's a clown"., he's smart alright ...., but he seems to have dubious moral compass when it comes to taking money off unsuspecting players on this betting platform.
Some would call it enterprising,.. some would call it...????
...I wouldn't agree that "he's a clown"., he's smart alright ...., but he seems to have dubious moral compass when it comes to taking money off unsuspecting players on this betting platform.Some would call it enterprising,.. some would call it...??
........I'm not being judgmental FOLYES....just putting up various talking points.
I couldn't care less what Rico in his many guises, or anyone else on here does, as long as it doesn't directly affect me....he never has...I don't bet " in play" ever.
........I'm not being judgmental FOLYES....just putting up various talking points.I couldn't care less what Rico in his many guises, or anyone else on here does, as long as it doesn't directly affect me....he never has...I don't bet " in play" ever.
It's why no-one has ever won the naps competition backing short ones. Even the two times soldier has won it was down to finding an outsider on the final day.
It's why no-one has ever won the naps competition backing short ones. Even the two times soldier has won it was down to finding an outsider on the final day.
Just a bit of banter. He hands it out and certainly deserved to get some. Tips up a 1/33 shortest-priced loser in British racing history, Phil Foden should have called it "Wreck It Rico".
Just a bit of banter. He hands it out and certainly deserved to get some. Tips up a 1/33 shortest-priced loser in British racing history, Phil Foden should have called it "Wreck It Rico".
I'm trying to decide what gets more people excited on Betfair, a packed dinghy arriving on our coast or Rico getting a bet badly wrong . Difficult one.
I'm trying to decide what gets more people excited on Betfair, a packed dinghy arriving on our coast or Rico getting a bet badly wrong . Difficult one.
acey deucy 08 Sep 26 23:17 If the thick c**t had any sense he could have lumped on Alcaraz to beat Ben Shelton coming up in one hour at odds of 1-3...Not 1-33
Shelton upsets Alcaraz in record late-night US Open QF thriller
thee who laughs last 😆
acey deucy 08 Sep 26 23:17 If the thick c**t had any sense he could have lumped on Alcaraz to beat Ben Shelton coming up in one hour at odds of 1-3...Not 1-33Shelton upsets Alcaraz in record late-night US Open QF thrillerthee who laughs last ԅ
Time to call it a day frico. You're a busted flush. An utter punting embarrassment. Take up bowls or something. Or start up a chimney repointing company. At least you will have a steady income.
Time to call it a day frico. You're a busted flush. An utter punting embarrassment. Take up bowls or something. Or start up a chimney repointing company. At least you will have a steady income.
slickster 08 Sep 26 00:28 Joined: 29 May 02 | Topic/replies: 8,779 | Blogger: slickster's blog Yes frico, slick can confirm you're OK with thissun. About time you got a 1.06 1.07 that's actually a TRUE cert. Rate reply: |
You’re a bit inconsistent, Slick.
slickster 08 Sep 26 00:28 Joined: 29 May 02 | Topic/replies: 8,779 | Blogger: slickster's blogYes frico, slick can confirm you're OK with thissun. About time you got a 1.06 1.07 that's actually a TRUE cert.Rate reply: |You’re a bit inconsistent, Sl
richgit09 Sep 26 08:37Joined: 13 Feb 02 | Topic/replies: 918 | Blogger: richgit's blog ...Brian...already about 10 million migrants living here !
Hi Richgit - I was making a general observation , not making a political statement
richgit09 Sep 26 08:37Joined: 13 Feb 02 | Topic/replies: 918 | Blogger: richgit's blog...Brian...already about 10 million migrants living here !Hi Richgit - I was making a general observation , not making a political statement
acey deucy 08 Sep 26 23:17 If the thick c**t had any sense he could have lumped on Alcaraz to beat Ben Shelton coming up in one hour at odds of 1-3...Not 1-33
slickster 08 Sep 26 Yes frico, slick can confirm you're OK with thissun. About time you got a 1.06 1.07 that's actually a TRUE cert.
rico/dickster/acey dopey...3 clowns 😆
acey deucy 08 Sep 26 23:17 If the thick c**t had any sense he could have lumped on Alcaraz to beat Ben Shelton coming up in one hour at odds of 1-3...Not 1-33slickster 08 Sep 26 Yes frico, slick can confirm you're OK with thissun. About time you got
Looks like slickster forgot to mention Baaeed, Constitution Hill X 2 among others, never mind a British record for a beaten horse Shafter, you should be in the Guiness Book Of Records as the most inept or thickest punter on the planet, making Moneytree look a genius!!
Looks like slickster forgot to mention Baaeed, Constitution Hill X 2 among others, never mind a British record for a beaten horse Shafter, you should be in the Guiness Book Of Records as the most inept or thickest punter on the planet, making Moneytr
2026 sees tobyliarcalgarymugs installed as an odds on favourite for Worlds biggest liar Competition after telling the BF forum some mighty unproven stories.
claimed he laid layed COT for 155k or more but came out with an 11k profit. You own a betting system valued at 600k + but finished in last place in a Div2 tipping comp. and caught 2 huge tuna that coincidentally the same fish were caught by someone else. my mother left £30,000,000 in her will.
glentoby 26 Jan 18 21:50
As far as I am aware I personally own the only method which will produce a long term profit,not a "system" as popularly refered to and devised after 2 decades + of research.My sole motivation for posting on any racing or betting forum is to give the average punter an edge.No more,no less.
My method would be no good to the average or even prudent punter or greedy chancers.I had an offer to purchase it following a trial by 4 individuals on the BF Forum,over a year using it.Bound by copyright etc and proven beyond doubt the worth of it.
The only time I was tempted to sell I had an offer that was £40,000 short of the £600,000 I would accept.All documented and recorded for posterity.I would only sell on condition that the proceeds went to SSAFA,knowing full well that would be the only payoff.
The offer came from a well known tipping operation who continue to rip off punters Nationwide and now coming up to their most lucrative period.
It is still for sale but £600k is the minumum I would consider to part with it on behalf of SSAFA!!
2026 sees tobyliarcalgarymugs installed as an odds on favourite for Worlds biggest liar Competition after telling the BF forum some mighty unproven stories.claimed he laid layed COT for 155k or more but came out with an 11k profit.You own a betting s