Najidi storm 1:30 1.07?

Post ya bet rico…..you big pro……

The bitter and twisted loser Acey

A fakin laughin Stock.

A fakin laughin Stock.

i will reiterate for dickster..i cannot bet big pre ennimore...

1,cant replace funds if lose big
2,who's goin to pay 20% on pre race bets?

prob just as well mind..the 1.66 may have been 1.56 last cupple mths

Because,if he has five figures on and it gets beat he cannot get five figures back into the A/C in one go,Dickster

there,ll be a few on course bookie,s thinking they were stealing tenners and fivers   been put on the 2nd fav,now no their going home losing for the  already

10 on track 33 bf..how they gona lose?

rico and slicks can at least console themselves they are a part of  history by putting up a record 1/33 loser.

ty

Mine would have been 15 odd foyles . Please don't compare me to the frico of nature who REGULARLY gets 1-16's turned over.
Bubbles I'm on here a long time. When I say 5 figures, let's say 80 bags. I doubt frico would try to bet more than 10 or 20 large on. He SHOULD be OK. Then again he don't half pick some losing beauts

1-5 odd for the forecast.

1-33 Juddmonte colt becomes shortest-priced loser in British racing history

Goodness me, Rico biggest loser ever (even beating Obeone on the football thread from 20 years ago). AND I didn't that was possible...

its all about lifetime p&l stormy.

Tipping up a 1.33 chance is crass stupidity.

what price should it have been iyo?

tbf you wouldnt  realistically  oppose it  for big money ,  but saying that it was unbackable to the average punter at the price.

U watch Arry Up go and win later

Only 10 of the geniuses in the Premier League thought that was the best of the day.

Slick knows he didn't place that f/c bet.....if he had it would have stung. Nobody laughs when you've done a few quid.

Slick. Be real lad. Liars will always get found out on here....eventually.

The F/C was better on here anyway if it had copped (1.32),Horatio.

Slick knows he didn't place that f/c bet.....if he had it would have stung. Nobody laughs when you've done a few quid.

Slick. Be real lad. Liars will always get found out on here....eventually.

apologies slicks f/cas t was available around 1.39-40 b4 off ........rico out on his own on the podium  ............forever to  be addressed as sir rico from now on !

tis a fact noone disagreed with me aint it..

You didn’t post the plunge bet……scenes…

Where’s mics to give us a comment on the ride

Anyway my comment anybody who plays a two year old that had its first run at Kempton at 1/33 should be shot

Well don, Rico. Officially the worst horse racing tip ever!!

There is a slight problem with your statement,tangle.
The horse was a 3YO

^^ just gone in and noticed the post

1.07 was value..easy trade at half the price.

I Laid the fav , got word late the ground may not suit

F/O cretinous,bongobullshatter

But,thank you for the remarkable aftertime

LOL

The simplest of bet editing opportunities ever for bongobullshatter,
Backs for whatever pre race and lays for the same pre race,involving a small loss or gain whatever the outcome,then delete the losing part.
Wait until 5.07 to post the aftertime claim and later show the profit.
BINGO

You may have mental issues Ironhead…..

Not at all,Aceform.
Bongo is a 24 Carat bullshatter

to those who backed the fav , i want to say a big THANK YOU!!! that is Christmas 2026 covered AND ALL OF NEXT YEAR!!!! wow

tobognib is backward.

Egg,chips and beans is a short price

Not quite the worst tip thread on here

Can't remember the poster, but his lay nap of the Aintree meeting was Mon Mome

For what it’s worth Aston Villa will get the thumping tonight,trust me.

I wouldn't trust you to post a letter,Aceform and you still have not learnt to leave the football alone

oisin wud have won on it

Ironsfailings has the hots for Formy.
Has followed him around for months, days on end
#unrequited

That was Money Tree, Poppy, but he does do the opposite to what’s he puts up.

HT and Villa are3/1 up

Rico certainly  wasn't wrong in his initial analysis of the odds on offer...just defeated by sod's law.
No need to rub it in if he's had a mare !

Just proves one thing without fast pics or drones worse than than Pandy and that's saying something!! Pity there's no PPI claim for fast pics and drones, biggest scandal ever BF allowing that

Not even scored a goal this season. Lochy tips them to get hammered and they bang in three first half goals!!

....Agreed he's made his fortune by foul means,.. not horse racing prowess.
However, no rules broken, so just exploiting weaknesses .

....The Banksters and hedge funds do it every day.

Loads of cons everyday doesn't mean it right. When in running first came out I knew of at least 10 people who did their conkers not realizing there was a delay.

The small sentence to cover it, not many young naive punters would ever read. I emailed saying for your first 5 bets it should of come up with a message telling you about the delay and not place your bet and if you placed your 6th bet it would do it with the 1 or 2 sec delay and then it would of been fair play, never got a reply.

formoftheace - For what it’s worth Aston Villa will get the thumping tonight,trust me.

ffs, some top tipping in this thread today.

...Amherst..........fair enough, I hear ya ......no argument from me.

richgit Joined: 13 Feb 02
....Agreed he's made his fortune by foul means,..

i sourced the live feed info/dish in 2005 on my own
i used sis
i used sis hacked codes for live feed
i used facetime
i sourced racecourse offices

nothing anyone could have done if they made an effort.

Rico the potless wonder.A.k.a The biggest loser ever (forever)
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh Cheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeese.

When you thought lightening couldn't strike twice the potless wonder appears.

Couldn't have happened to a nicer lad ;).

Oh Cheese!

PMSLbets joins the party..

speaking of potless.

pm bets nailed it......Fakin laughin stock time after fakin time.

PMSL,along with Dickster remains the two clowns unable to post a single bet on BF.
I wonder why

Rico's lays of the day 5:15
Rico-Dangleflaps
Rico-Dangleflaps04 Jul 24 17:07Joined: 07 Sep 18 | Topic/replies: 2,524 | Blogger: Rico-Dangleflaps's blog
Lay (Bet Against)
Backer's odds Backer's stake
Payout
Liability
Searchingtheblues
110.00
£6.32
£688.88
Total stake:
£6.32

i wont usher thissin in Mischief......Makes this wan look small fry ffs.

Perhaps I should have included the self confessed loser,Acey?

I am gonna sleep like a new born baby the night.

On the back of not making a profit but somebody losing?

If the thick c**t had any sense he could have lumped on Alcaraz to beat Ben Shelton coming up in one hour at odds of 1-3...Not 1-33

Post your bet,Acey and enlighten me

Once again thanks you guys for lumping on that dodgy fav who i heard BEFORE the race did a bad gallop a week ago ......i guess he was "value" hehe anyway , just had a lovely meal all the trimmings , entertaining a few ladies tonight and made a large donation to the local animal rescue so just know your hard earned will do some good in the end, thank you all again , bingo

FRO,Eggy,you bullshatter

i might put up another gold star lay tomorrow to help you all win something back

special thanks to mr p i s s flaps who talked up the fav as good "value" keep doing that in future

Good Value.

that was THE easiest lay bet i have ever done , was able to lay it solidly for peanuts to win a small fortune the way i like it , wow i was shouting home the footballer owned horse

Try doing so before the race next time,you pathetic,potless attention seeker

two very nice ladies tonight , one on each ball , after a MASSIVE WIN!!! yes!!! great fun

What did bf return the price of the winner ? Ta.

... OK just found it was 22/1,come racing and get 10/1.

Rico doesn't like my use of the phrase " foul means " for his winnings...in mitigation he says .." I used SIS HACKED codes for the feed "........oh, apologies from me then in that case !

Slicer 1333

Is that backing short ones or backing horses trained by Roger Charlton ?

Post that 1/33 play ric……scenes tbh….

...you're living in the past Jim....

Co-Pilot's view:

There was an example yesterday of a really long odds-on shot getting beat yesterday. 1/33 SP. Odds of 1.07 were available on Betfair. Some gamblers thought this Betfair price was value. These gamblers have capital behind them and at that price the stakes must have been high. It was a three horse race. Is there anything as senseless as this when National savings Bonds are available and ISAs?
Short answer: 
Yes, — backing a 1/33 SP horse at 1.07 on Betfair in a three‑runner race is one of the most senseless uses of capital you’ll ever see in gambling. When safe, government‑backed instruments like NS&I and ISAs exist, the comparison becomes almost comically stark.

But the deeper point is why intelligent, well‑capitalised gamblers still do it — and why it’s structurally irrational even before you compare it to savings products.

...Some do it so that they can post their winning bet on this forum...and then puff their chests out in their wonderfulness...........pitiful really.

There was an example yesterday of a really long odds-on shot getting beat yesterday. 1/33 SP. Odds of 1.07 were available on Betfair. Some gamblers thought this Betfair price was value. These gamblers have capital behind them and at that price the stakes must have been high. It was a three horse race. Is there anything as senseless as this when National savings Bonds are available and ISAs?
Short answer: 
Yes, Paul — backing a 1/33 SP horse at 1.07 on Betfair in a three‑runner race is one of the most senseless uses of capital you’ll ever see in gambling. When safe, government‑backed instruments like NS&I and ISAs exist, the comparison becomes almost comically stark.

But the deeper point is why intelligent, well‑capitalised gamblers still do it — and why it’s structurally irrational even before you compare it to savings products.
1. The core absurdity: the risk–reward ratio is broken
Let’s quantify it cleanly.

Backing at 1.07
Stake: £100,000 (typical for syndicates)

Profit if it wins: £7,000

Loss if it loses: £100,000

True probability of a 1/33 SP horse losing
Even elite odds‑on shots get beaten:

Falls

Refuses

Hampered

Misjudged pace

Jockey error

Tactical mess in small fields

The real probability of defeat is far higher than the implied 7% margin the backer is “earning”.

If the true chance of losing is even 2%, the expected value collapses:

There was an example yesterday of a really long odds-on shot getting beat yesterday. 1/33 SP. Odds of 1.07 were available on Betfair. Some gamblers thought this Betfair price was value. These gamblers have capital behind them and at that price the stakes must have been high. It was a three horse race. Is there anything as senseless as this when National savings Bonds are available and ISAs?
Short answer: 
Yes, Paul — backing a 1/33 SP horse at 1.07 on Betfair in a three‑runner race is one of the most senseless uses of capital you’ll ever see in gambling. When safe, government‑backed instruments like NS&I and ISAs exist, the comparison becomes almost comically stark.

But the deeper point is why intelligent, well‑capitalised gamblers still do it — and why it’s structurally irrational even before you compare it to savings products.

...Tuttle, in fairness, the 7% profit on here would be instant....the 5% on NSI would require a lengthy time commitment........apples and pears .

There are format effectors in co-pilot's reply which prevent me from putting the whole screed up but I'm sure you get the drift

It’s a better time to be living in richgit

Yes there is that richgit but in the end the decision to do it boils down to ego

it did look "free money" but as said you would have to be a high roller to back it and you wouldnt want to oppose it for high stakes ,most of these very long odds on shots win hence the record sp of this one , backers of these "certs" and that is what they are most of the time get into a comfort zone ,its like finding it on the street and the more that win the more comfortable it gets backing em they expect to win it is rare to lose , most punters cannot see past the 1st 2 in the betting especially in the non handicaps ,rico may have made loads in the past on in running when the odds were massivly on his side with fast pics live feeds drones or whatever  i respect him for that he got off his arris and exploited it while most were to slow or me included  didnt have the know how, the game has changed the bots/ technology  or whatever have caught up and closed the avenues but you can get used to playing very short prices and its difficult change the habit . what is value ? when a price is bigger than you think it should be but is your opinion on the price being too big  correct ?

Frico the OP has a lot of previous for this type of "cert" "full bank" etc. From memory he got sharona 100s in a 3 horse (lay) to actually win, field of gold 1st 3 1.06, ombudsman 1st 3 1.06, what a girl wants 1st 3 1.06, and now najiri storm 1.06 1.07 ALL stuffed into oblivion. Money tree would be proud. But not even he could have done this.
Frico claims to be 3.3 up lol. How? Fast feeds and drones many years ago. It's certainly not racing knowledge as he has proven on several occasions that he is gullible naive and clueless. He THIEVED this loot. Should be locked up. Likes to invent porkies as well. Great for a laugh though.
My name is frico
I am a prico
At half past 4 I go for a nap
At half past 5 I go for a **** .

...." most of us were too slow".........OR,... most of us wouldn't use Hacked SIS codes ?

It's obvious in hindsight but giving 7lbs away. Practically heavy ground. Jockey totally useless. How freaky thought it was "value" at 1.07 defies belief. Of course it still should have won (I did the forecast ), but value it was not. Fricoco the clown is all washed up. A proven proper clown.

...I wouldn't agree that "he's a clown"., he's smart alright ...., but he  seems to have dubious moral compass when it comes to taking money off unsuspecting players on this betting platform.

Some would call it enterprising,.. some would  call it...????

i am not  that techy to know about hacked codes ,but as said bankers / politicians /the elite  use dodgy means to get along so why not the common man.

........I'm not being judgmental FOLYES....just putting up various talking points.

I couldn't care less what Rico in his many guises, or anyone else on here does, as long as it doesn't directly affect me....he never has...I don't bet " in play" ever.

It's why no-one has ever won the naps competition backing short ones. Even the two times soldier has won it was down to finding an outsider on the final day.

Post ya bet rico……you say that to others often enough tbf.