Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
https://x.com/DarylCarter7/status/2090488305234112791
Show More
To view keyboard shortcuts, press question mark
View keyboard shortcuts
Article
See new posts
Conversation
Pinned
Daryl Carter
@DarylCarter7
When Is Enough, Enough?
When Is Enough, Enough?
I love racing. It absolutely consumes my life.
I love breaking down races, studying form, assessing prices and giving honest betting advice. I love watching racing, learning from it and going back over the days when I got things wrong.
That last part matters.
A serious betting service cannot judge itself only by its winners. You have to examine the mistakes, question your decisions and continually test whether your methods still stand up. I have done that for years, and over that time I believe I have proved that my approach works.
I have never claimed that means winning every day, every week or every month. Nobody operating honestly in this game could make such a promise.
What it means is that the method has been demonstrated over a long and meaningful period. The work has been done, the records have been kept and the results have been there.
But it raises a question that I increasingly find myself asking:
When you have proved yourself over many years, how much longer are you expected to keep proving it?
Does a public profit-and-loss record still have a purpose?
I have always been a strong advocate of keeping strict records.
A betting service should be accountable. It should not be able to advertise the winners, hide the losers and present a completely false picture of its performance. Proper record-keeping protects punters and separates serious services from those selling dreams.
I could not stand it when the Racing Post removed its historic tipster records. I believed those records mattered.
Part of me still does.
However, I am increasingly questioning whether publishing a continuous public profit-and-loss record is worth it once somebody has already established their ability over many years.
What is the record supposed to prove?
If a person has five, six or ten years of transparent results, surely that record has already answered the main question. It has shown whether they can do the job. It has shown whether their methods can survive different seasons, changing markets and inevitable periods of variance.
Yet that never appears to be enough.
The moment a difficult run arrives, the long-term evidence is pushed aside. Years of profitable work suddenly become irrelevant because somebody can isolate a bad week, a losing month or an uncomfortable quarter.
The full record is not used to assess the tipster fairly. It is mined for ammunition.
That is the strange reality of publishing a P&L in racing today. The very thing you provide as evidence of your honesty can be taken apart, stripped of context and used against you.
If you do not publish a record, people say you must be hiding something.
If you do publish one, they select the weakest period and declare that it proves you are useless.
If the long-term figures are strong, they question the prices, the staking, the availability or whether anybody could have placed the bets.
If the short-term results are poor, none of the previous evidence matters.
Eventually, you have to ask whether the people demanding proof are genuinely interested in proof at all.
For some, no amount of evidence will ever be sufficient because they are not looking for an honest answer. They are looking for an opportunity to discredit someone.
A P&L should tell the complete story of a betting method. Increasingly, it is used to tell whichever fragment of the story best suits somebody’s agenda.
Accountability is not the same as permanent public interrogation
There is an important distinction here.
I am not arguing that tipsters should operate without accountability. Racing has its share of dishonest services, exaggerated claims and people who advertise every winner while quietly forgetting every loser.
Punters deserve protection from that.
But accountability should not mean that an established tipster must stand trial every morning.
There must surely come a point when a long-term body of evidence counts for something. Otherwise, what is the purpose of building that record in the first place?
If ten years of results can be dismissed because of ten difficult days, we are no longer discussing evidence. We are discussing emotion, tribalism and the desire to see someone fail.
Perhaps the answer is to continue keeping records without allowing a public daily total to become the entire identity of a service.
Records still matter internally. They matter to the members who understand them. They matter for reviewing methods, identifying weaknesses and ensuring that the advice remains worthwhile.
But does every daily rise and fall need to be displayed publicly for hostile spectators who have no interest in joining the service and no intention of interpreting the figures honestly?
I am no longer convinced that it does.
A verified long-term record, supported by meaningful periodic updates, may tell people far more than a running total that is examined and weaponised every afternoon.
The reality of my own service
My own service currently has around 500 members.
More importantly to me, there is a core membership of approximately 350 people who have been with me since the beginning. They know the journey. They have experienced the strong runs, the difficult periods and everything in between.
That loyalty is an achievement in itself.
In an industry where customers often jump from one service to another chasing whoever happens to be winning that week, retaining such a substantial core membership says something that a screenshot of a short-term P&L never could.
Those members are serious punters. They know the time of day.
They understand that betting is not a straight line upwards. They understand odds, value and losing runs. They do not require a winner every day to reassure them that the work is being done properly.
They judge the service over time because that is the only sensible way to judge any betting method.
Of course, there will always be people coming and going. That is part of running a subscription service.
Some will join during a hot run, expecting it to continue indefinitely. A difficult week arrives and they immediately move to the next service displaying a recent winner.
You cannot build a serious long-term operation around those people.
If you try, you eventually compromise the advice. You start thinking about what will keep short-term customers happy rather than what represents genuine betting value.
That is the conundrum every tipster faces.
Do you put up shorter-priced, more obvious horses to create regular winners and immediate customer satisfaction?
Or do you remain committed to value, accept the losing runs and understand that many people will not have the patience to see the method through?
I would rather retain 350 serious members who understand the process than continually chase people looking for a quick route to riches.
That core membership is more meaningful to me than the opinions of people outside the service who have never seen the daily work, do not understand the method and are waiting for any opportunity to attack it.
Racing’s culture of hate
The most difficult part is not legitimate criticism.
Anyone who gives public opinions, sells a service or operates in racing should be open to fair scrutiny. If somebody questions a selection, challenges a method or disagrees with an opinion, that is part of the conversation.
The problem is the behaviour that goes far beyond criticism.
There are circles within racing that appear to exist almost entirely to ridicule, provoke and destroy. They operate across forums, X, YouTube and almost every other platform where racing is discussed.
They wait for people to fail.
They screenshot losing selections, remove the surrounding context and pass them around for entertainment. They manipulate figures, repeat rumours and encourage others to join in. They contact businesses, target livelihoods and try to damage reputations that took years to build. This happened to be the reason I lost an early job at one firm!
It is not analysis. It is not consumer protection. It is not healthy scepticism.
It is hate dressed up as racing discussion.
If you are doing badly, they celebrate it.
If you are doing well, they question it.
If you remain quiet, they decide your silence proves something.
If you defend yourself, they say you cannot handle criticism.
If you celebrate a winner, they accuse you of showing off.
There is no acceptable response because the objective is not fairness. The objective is to get a reaction and make somebody feel unwelcome.
Some people genuinely appear to receive a kick from the idea that they might damage a business or push somebody out of racing. They forget—or perhaps simply do not care—that there is a person behind the account.
That person has a family, responsibilities and bills to pay. They may have spent years building something, only to watch strangers casually attempt to destroy it for entertainment.
It is disgusting behaviour, and racing has tolerated far too much of it for far too long.
And if you want my honest truth, the abuse following from my Betfair departure sent me onto anti-depressants for a good while.
The people shouting loudest often understand the least
Many of the most aggressive voices have very little understanding of betting.
They do not understand probability, variance, expected losing runs or the difference between price and outcome. They do not appreciate that a good bet can lose or that a poor-value selection can win.
Their entire judgement begins and ends with the result.
Won: good tip.
Lost: bad tip.
That is not how betting works.
People such as Andy Holding and Hugh Taylor have produced excellent work over many years. Yet even established judges can be taken apart online after a difficult few months or an off year.
Does all the previous work suddenly mean nothing?
Has all their knowledge disappeared?
Were the profitable years somehow imaginary because the latest period was disappointing?
Anyone with a genuine understanding of betting knows the answer. But understanding rarely generates as much attention as outrage.
Why the exhaustion is turning me away from racing
The hardest thing to admit is that the constant hostility is gradually turning me off the sport I love.
Not the horses. Not the race analysis. Not the challenge of finding value.
It is everything surrounding it.
It is the constant feeling that you have to prove yourself again every day, no matter how much evidence you have already produced.
It is knowing that one poor result will be spread further than a month of good work.
It is the need to consider how every comment might be deliberately misinterpreted.
It is watching people who contribute nothing attempt to destroy those who put their opinions, work and reputations on the line.
That exhaustion builds.
Racing consumes enough mental energy when you are approaching it seriously. Studying cards, reviewing races, managing records, advising members and constantly evaluating your own decisions all require focus.
Adding relentless personal abuse on top of that can drain the enjoyment from the sport.
There are days when I understand why people walk away. There are days when I wonder whether having a public voice in racing is worth it at all.
If a new person asked me whether they should become a tipster, start a racing channel or express strong opinions online, I would struggle to recommend it.
I might tell them to stay private. Enjoy racing with friends. Keep their bets to themselves and avoid building a public profile.
That is an incredibly sad thing to say.
Racing should want new voices. It should want knowledgeable people prepared to share ideas, challenge established thinking and create interesting discussion.
Instead, many people learn that expressing an opinion brings ridicule. Getting something wrong invites a pile-on, while getting something right can bring resentment.
Eventually, people stop talking.
The sport then loses precisely the voices it should be encouraging, leaving the conversation increasingly dominated by those who prefer conflict to insight.
Are tipsters allowed to celebrate?
There is another strange expectation placed on anyone offering betting advice.
When a selection loses, people are free to attack. But when a big winner lands, the tipster is expected to remain almost apologetically quiet.
Yes, celebrations can sometimes become excessive. Nobody enjoys endless victory laps, especially when losing selections are conveniently ignored.
But when somebody has worked under pressure, endured abuse and come through a difficult period, why should they not enjoy a winner?
Celebrating is often a release.
It is the moment when the research, pressure and emotional weight finally produce something positive. It does not mean the person believes they are invincible. It does not erase the losing bets, and it does not guarantee another winner tomorrow.
Sometimes it simply means they are happy.
After all the criticism tipsters receive when things go badly, it is unreasonable to demand silence when things go well.
So, is keeping a P&L still worth it?
My honest answer is that keeping accurate records will always be worthwhile.
Making every movement of those records available to the entire internet is a different question.
A serious service should maintain complete results. It should be honest with its members and should never hide from poor performance. Long-term summaries should remain available so that potential customers can make an informed decision.
But once a service has established years of evidence, it should not be required to present itself for public judgement every single day.
At some point, the body of work must be allowed to stand.
The purpose of a record should be accountability—not appeasement. It should help genuine members evaluate a service, not provide daily ammunition to people acting in bad faith.
My responsibility is to the members who trust the service, including the 350 or so who have remained with me throughout the journey.
It is to give them honest advice, maintain accurate records, explain difficult periods and continue working to improve.
It is not my responsibility to satisfy people who have already decided that nothing I achieve will ever be enough.
Perhaps that is the only sustainable answer.
Keep the records. Keep the standards. Keep the honesty.
But stop allowing hostile strangers to decide what your years of work are worth.
A losing week does not erase a successful career. A difficult year does not remove somebody’s knowledge. Celebrating a winner does not make somebody arrogant, and experiencing a losing run does not make them a fraud.
Racing desperately needs to relearn the difference between scrutiny and cruelty.
Until it does, more good people will become exhausted, more knowledgeable voices will disappear and more newcomers will decide that speaking publicly about the sport simply is not worth it.
For a sport that claims to value opinions, knowledge and debate, that would be a terrible loss.
Want to publish your own Article?
Upgrade to Premium
6:17 PM · Aug 20, 2026
·
1,489
Views
View keyboard shortcuts
Article
See new posts
Conversation
Pinned
Daryl Carter
@DarylCarter7
When Is Enough, Enough?
When Is Enough, Enough?
I love racing. It absolutely consumes my life.
I love breaking down races, studying form, assessing prices and giving honest betting advice. I love watching racing, learning from it and going back over the days when I got things wrong.
That last part matters.
A serious betting service cannot judge itself only by its winners. You have to examine the mistakes, question your decisions and continually test whether your methods still stand up. I have done that for years, and over that time I believe I have proved that my approach works.
I have never claimed that means winning every day, every week or every month. Nobody operating honestly in this game could make such a promise.
What it means is that the method has been demonstrated over a long and meaningful period. The work has been done, the records have been kept and the results have been there.
But it raises a question that I increasingly find myself asking:
When you have proved yourself over many years, how much longer are you expected to keep proving it?
Does a public profit-and-loss record still have a purpose?
I have always been a strong advocate of keeping strict records.
A betting service should be accountable. It should not be able to advertise the winners, hide the losers and present a completely false picture of its performance. Proper record-keeping protects punters and separates serious services from those selling dreams.
I could not stand it when the Racing Post removed its historic tipster records. I believed those records mattered.
Part of me still does.
However, I am increasingly questioning whether publishing a continuous public profit-and-loss record is worth it once somebody has already established their ability over many years.
What is the record supposed to prove?
If a person has five, six or ten years of transparent results, surely that record has already answered the main question. It has shown whether they can do the job. It has shown whether their methods can survive different seasons, changing markets and inevitable periods of variance.
Yet that never appears to be enough.
The moment a difficult run arrives, the long-term evidence is pushed aside. Years of profitable work suddenly become irrelevant because somebody can isolate a bad week, a losing month or an uncomfortable quarter.
The full record is not used to assess the tipster fairly. It is mined for ammunition.
That is the strange reality of publishing a P&L in racing today. The very thing you provide as evidence of your honesty can be taken apart, stripped of context and used against you.
If you do not publish a record, people say you must be hiding something.
If you do publish one, they select the weakest period and declare that it proves you are useless.
If the long-term figures are strong, they question the prices, the staking, the availability or whether anybody could have placed the bets.
If the short-term results are poor, none of the previous evidence matters.
Eventually, you have to ask whether the people demanding proof are genuinely interested in proof at all.
For some, no amount of evidence will ever be sufficient because they are not looking for an honest answer. They are looking for an opportunity to discredit someone.
A P&L should tell the complete story of a betting method. Increasingly, it is used to tell whichever fragment of the story best suits somebody’s agenda.
Accountability is not the same as permanent public interrogation
There is an important distinction here.
I am not arguing that tipsters should operate without accountability. Racing has its share of dishonest services, exaggerated claims and people who advertise every winner while quietly forgetting every loser.
Punters deserve protection from that.
But accountability should not mean that an established tipster must stand trial every morning.
There must surely come a point when a long-term body of evidence counts for something. Otherwise, what is the purpose of building that record in the first place?
If ten years of results can be dismissed because of ten difficult days, we are no longer discussing evidence. We are discussing emotion, tribalism and the desire to see someone fail.
Perhaps the answer is to continue keeping records without allowing a public daily total to become the entire identity of a service.
Records still matter internally. They matter to the members who understand them. They matter for reviewing methods, identifying weaknesses and ensuring that the advice remains worthwhile.
But does every daily rise and fall need to be displayed publicly for hostile spectators who have no interest in joining the service and no intention of interpreting the figures honestly?
I am no longer convinced that it does.
A verified long-term record, supported by meaningful periodic updates, may tell people far more than a running total that is examined and weaponised every afternoon.
The reality of my own service
My own service currently has around 500 members.
More importantly to me, there is a core membership of approximately 350 people who have been with me since the beginning. They know the journey. They have experienced the strong runs, the difficult periods and everything in between.
That loyalty is an achievement in itself.
In an industry where customers often jump from one service to another chasing whoever happens to be winning that week, retaining such a substantial core membership says something that a screenshot of a short-term P&L never could.
Those members are serious punters. They know the time of day.
They understand that betting is not a straight line upwards. They understand odds, value and losing runs. They do not require a winner every day to reassure them that the work is being done properly.
They judge the service over time because that is the only sensible way to judge any betting method.
Of course, there will always be people coming and going. That is part of running a subscription service.
Some will join during a hot run, expecting it to continue indefinitely. A difficult week arrives and they immediately move to the next service displaying a recent winner.
You cannot build a serious long-term operation around those people.
If you try, you eventually compromise the advice. You start thinking about what will keep short-term customers happy rather than what represents genuine betting value.
That is the conundrum every tipster faces.
Do you put up shorter-priced, more obvious horses to create regular winners and immediate customer satisfaction?
Or do you remain committed to value, accept the losing runs and understand that many people will not have the patience to see the method through?
I would rather retain 350 serious members who understand the process than continually chase people looking for a quick route to riches.
That core membership is more meaningful to me than the opinions of people outside the service who have never seen the daily work, do not understand the method and are waiting for any opportunity to attack it.
Racing’s culture of hate
The most difficult part is not legitimate criticism.
Anyone who gives public opinions, sells a service or operates in racing should be open to fair scrutiny. If somebody questions a selection, challenges a method or disagrees with an opinion, that is part of the conversation.
The problem is the behaviour that goes far beyond criticism.
There are circles within racing that appear to exist almost entirely to ridicule, provoke and destroy. They operate across forums, X, YouTube and almost every other platform where racing is discussed.
They wait for people to fail.
They screenshot losing selections, remove the surrounding context and pass them around for entertainment. They manipulate figures, repeat rumours and encourage others to join in. They contact businesses, target livelihoods and try to damage reputations that took years to build. This happened to be the reason I lost an early job at one firm!
It is not analysis. It is not consumer protection. It is not healthy scepticism.
It is hate dressed up as racing discussion.
If you are doing badly, they celebrate it.
If you are doing well, they question it.
If you remain quiet, they decide your silence proves something.
If you defend yourself, they say you cannot handle criticism.
If you celebrate a winner, they accuse you of showing off.
There is no acceptable response because the objective is not fairness. The objective is to get a reaction and make somebody feel unwelcome.
Some people genuinely appear to receive a kick from the idea that they might damage a business or push somebody out of racing. They forget—or perhaps simply do not care—that there is a person behind the account.
That person has a family, responsibilities and bills to pay. They may have spent years building something, only to watch strangers casually attempt to destroy it for entertainment.
It is disgusting behaviour, and racing has tolerated far too much of it for far too long.
And if you want my honest truth, the abuse following from my Betfair departure sent me onto anti-depressants for a good while.
The people shouting loudest often understand the least
Many of the most aggressive voices have very little understanding of betting.
They do not understand probability, variance, expected losing runs or the difference between price and outcome. They do not appreciate that a good bet can lose or that a poor-value selection can win.
Their entire judgement begins and ends with the result.
Won: good tip.
Lost: bad tip.
That is not how betting works.
People such as Andy Holding and Hugh Taylor have produced excellent work over many years. Yet even established judges can be taken apart online after a difficult few months or an off year.
Does all the previous work suddenly mean nothing?
Has all their knowledge disappeared?
Were the profitable years somehow imaginary because the latest period was disappointing?
Anyone with a genuine understanding of betting knows the answer. But understanding rarely generates as much attention as outrage.
Why the exhaustion is turning me away from racing
The hardest thing to admit is that the constant hostility is gradually turning me off the sport I love.
Not the horses. Not the race analysis. Not the challenge of finding value.
It is everything surrounding it.
It is the constant feeling that you have to prove yourself again every day, no matter how much evidence you have already produced.
It is knowing that one poor result will be spread further than a month of good work.
It is the need to consider how every comment might be deliberately misinterpreted.
It is watching people who contribute nothing attempt to destroy those who put their opinions, work and reputations on the line.
That exhaustion builds.
Racing consumes enough mental energy when you are approaching it seriously. Studying cards, reviewing races, managing records, advising members and constantly evaluating your own decisions all require focus.
Adding relentless personal abuse on top of that can drain the enjoyment from the sport.
There are days when I understand why people walk away. There are days when I wonder whether having a public voice in racing is worth it at all.
If a new person asked me whether they should become a tipster, start a racing channel or express strong opinions online, I would struggle to recommend it.
I might tell them to stay private. Enjoy racing with friends. Keep their bets to themselves and avoid building a public profile.
That is an incredibly sad thing to say.
Racing should want new voices. It should want knowledgeable people prepared to share ideas, challenge established thinking and create interesting discussion.
Instead, many people learn that expressing an opinion brings ridicule. Getting something wrong invites a pile-on, while getting something right can bring resentment.
Eventually, people stop talking.
The sport then loses precisely the voices it should be encouraging, leaving the conversation increasingly dominated by those who prefer conflict to insight.
Are tipsters allowed to celebrate?
There is another strange expectation placed on anyone offering betting advice.
When a selection loses, people are free to attack. But when a big winner lands, the tipster is expected to remain almost apologetically quiet.
Yes, celebrations can sometimes become excessive. Nobody enjoys endless victory laps, especially when losing selections are conveniently ignored.
But when somebody has worked under pressure, endured abuse and come through a difficult period, why should they not enjoy a winner?
Celebrating is often a release.
It is the moment when the research, pressure and emotional weight finally produce something positive. It does not mean the person believes they are invincible. It does not erase the losing bets, and it does not guarantee another winner tomorrow.
Sometimes it simply means they are happy.
After all the criticism tipsters receive when things go badly, it is unreasonable to demand silence when things go well.
So, is keeping a P&L still worth it?
My honest answer is that keeping accurate records will always be worthwhile.
Making every movement of those records available to the entire internet is a different question.
A serious service should maintain complete results. It should be honest with its members and should never hide from poor performance. Long-term summaries should remain available so that potential customers can make an informed decision.
But once a service has established years of evidence, it should not be required to present itself for public judgement every single day.
At some point, the body of work must be allowed to stand.
The purpose of a record should be accountability—not appeasement. It should help genuine members evaluate a service, not provide daily ammunition to people acting in bad faith.
My responsibility is to the members who trust the service, including the 350 or so who have remained with me throughout the journey.
It is to give them honest advice, maintain accurate records, explain difficult periods and continue working to improve.
It is not my responsibility to satisfy people who have already decided that nothing I achieve will ever be enough.
Perhaps that is the only sustainable answer.
Keep the records. Keep the standards. Keep the honesty.
But stop allowing hostile strangers to decide what your years of work are worth.
A losing week does not erase a successful career. A difficult year does not remove somebody’s knowledge. Celebrating a winner does not make somebody arrogant, and experiencing a losing run does not make them a fraud.
Racing desperately needs to relearn the difference between scrutiny and cruelty.
Until it does, more good people will become exhausted, more knowledgeable voices will disappear and more newcomers will decide that speaking publicly about the sport simply is not worth it.
For a sport that claims to value opinions, knowledge and debate, that would be a terrible loss.
Want to publish your own Article?
Upgrade to Premium
6:17 PM · Aug 20, 2026
·
1,489
Views
Not had a great summer and he is feeling it, back on the tools in a year.
if you are that good at tipstering why would you need to make money selling tips ?
It’s every man for himself in the punting game,and nobody is really interested in in your tips whether they win or lose.
Ego thing & they don't make the game pay from their punting. Someone should tell DC that you're only as good as your last winner
The Ebor will have finished before you get to the end of all that.
pre race punting is a minefield...without an edge its a game of snakes and ladders.
if you've looked over that betting market analysis he's promoting, you'll quickly realise he hasn't got a scooby on racing
He clearly hasn't got the temperament or the thickness of skin for it, not the first time he's made a t1t out of himself on twitter.
He makes well over 10 plus a month for tipping and he is crying. Hilarious times.
Aug 20, 2026 -- 8:39PM, FOYLESWAR wrote:
if you are that good at tipstering why would you need to make money selling tips ?
500 people paying him £40 a month, so 20k a month income, insane.
Daryl Carter
@DarylCarter7
Just to add. People shouldn’t get this twisted. I am firmly in profit. I keep strict records.
But I am sick of the constant hate people get for simply expresssing their opinion in a sport built for opinions.
9:12 PM · Aug 20, 2026
·
756
Views
He's a funny chap old daz some grifter
@DarylCarter7
Just to add. People shouldn’t get this twisted. I am firmly in profit. I keep strict records.
But I am sick of the constant hate people get for simply expresssing their opinion in a sport built for opinions.
9:12 PM · Aug 20, 2026
·
756
Views
He's a funny chap old daz some grifter
Bit like you backing 1.06's and 1.16's as "certs" and getting the majority stuffed. Very gullible.
Any tipster that can’t cover a punters losses on there own tips won’t survive
1 from 12 at York it’s hard at York always has been, a good tipper would be cautious especially with the ground changing
Go back further, he's proven he cant win.
Maybe when he was a "proven winner" that was VARIANCE and now the figures are undergoing a correction
Losing tipsters love that word.
Maybe when he was a "proven winner" that was VARIANCE and now the figures are undergoing a correction
Losing tipsters love that word.
Those that can,do it for themselves.
Those that cannot,tip horses.
Those that cannot,tip horses.
He needs to keep his head down and hope the subs keep the faith
I've seen him lose his rag and that doesn't pay the bills
He's lucky people swallow the "I am good, we are in it together, working harder than ever, cream rises to the top, take no notice of the people who've seen my type before and are calling me out" jargon.
I've seen him lose his rag and that doesn't pay the bills
He's lucky people swallow the "I am good, we are in it together, working harder than ever, cream rises to the top, take no notice of the people who've seen my type before and are calling me out" jargon.
only need TONY CALVIN to call him a loser on X and world war 111 will break out 
Calvin thought he was lazy and a bit of a chancer..quite a few rumours around why he got binned by betfair,from unacceptable behaviour to fiddling his P&L.wouldnt like to meet him with one of his scaffold poles in his hand..I'm blocked on the clown's twitter so can't have an intelligent conversation with him but I'd say now is the time to go full-calvin and have a total reset
I'd say a fair amateur standard. Could make 100 breaks occasionally.
I was asked to “ come on board our tipping site “ you are well known …..
I replied lol no ta…..
I replied lol no ta…..
Thanks.
I am now struggling to knock in a fifty,JCM.
I am now struggling to knock in a fifty,JCM.
i was in a great position for a 147 once, but sadly i missed the first red.
Sadly a thing of the past,Busy.
Age does not improve your snooker
Age does not improve your snooker
lost me there
theres very little chance chavcarter was able to come up with that tiresome justification and whingefest
he is burly literate
theres very little chance chavcarter was able to come up with that tiresome justification and whingefest
he is burly literate
Only a dickheed would put that epic rant out. I haven't read it and would
be surprised if anyone else could be bothered to do so.
be surprised if anyone else could be bothered to do so.
He’s actually RIGHT, I’ve never heard of him but the things that he’s said here go on daily.
…” Racing’s culture of hate
The most difficult part is not legitimate criticism.
Anyone who gives public opinions, sells a service or operates in racing should be open to fair scrutiny. If somebody questions a selection, challenges a method or disagrees with an opinion, that is part of the conversation.
The problem is the behaviour that goes far beyond criticism.
There are circles within racing that appear to exist almost entirely to ridicule, provoke and destroy. They operate across forums, X, YouTube and almost every other platform where racing is discussed.
They wait for people to fail….”
The very sad thing is that HATE vibes is now a part of daily life and social media has spread more divide throughout the world, particularly in the West.
…” Racing’s culture of hate
The most difficult part is not legitimate criticism.
Anyone who gives public opinions, sells a service or operates in racing should be open to fair scrutiny. If somebody questions a selection, challenges a method or disagrees with an opinion, that is part of the conversation.
The problem is the behaviour that goes far beyond criticism.
There are circles within racing that appear to exist almost entirely to ridicule, provoke and destroy. They operate across forums, X, YouTube and almost every other platform where racing is discussed.
They wait for people to fail….”
The very sad thing is that HATE vibes is now a part of daily life and social media has spread more divide throughout the world, particularly in the West.
imagine just the faintest possibility that someone might fancy a different horse to CARTER and then have the temerity to hope that CARTERS tip ,loses or in his words [ FAIL }
If you don’t know his tip then you’d not care.
People in general are more likely to hope that it, “Fails” because they simply don’t like him for whatever reason.
If you don’t know of him you’d not have any interest.
Having read a bit of that and now being aware that he’s another tipster & a little of his past histor, I’d never think of him or what he might select again!
People in general are more likely to hope that it, “Fails” because they simply don’t like him for whatever reason.
If you don’t know of him you’d not have any interest.
Having read a bit of that and now being aware that he’s another tipster & a little of his past histor, I’d never think of him or what he might select again!
he doesnt leave it at a tipping line he,s on X 24 /7 telling losers where they go wrong in their betting and if they follow a few of his basic betting tips ,they,ll all become better punters blah,blah,by the sounds of it not this week,month,season or year though
Well if he’s doing that he’s welcome to them replying whatever and them doing the same if he loses!
X is a bitter cesspit so he leaves himself open to anything as Musk allows it.
Thanks for explaining a bit more.
One thing he isn’t, is concise!
X is a bitter cesspit so he leaves himself open to anything as Musk allows it.
Thanks for explaining a bit more.
One thing he isn’t, is concise!
had a rant earlier in the week about how some FAVS can be just as good a value as a 33,s shot,but never explained which ones or how you no which ones are value
Peoples Mental Health would be far better if the left Social Media alone.
So it was more like attention seeking or click baiting!
It’s Unsocial Media, a place for nosebags!
It’s Unsocial Media, a place for nosebags!
only 2nd choice after leaving the columbian marching powder alone, which carter,s rants are always post or during a few lines of at least
Sounds like the cake guy that’s taken about 80k worth of orders and can’t keep up doing it on his own,some waiting 8 months so he told them claim it back from the banks but it’s out of time, on Facebook he’s ranting the same that it’s the peoples faults not being patient when he told them He only had one kitchen oven
Richard Birch with a temper.
Love the sympathy attempt (Anti-depressants).
Seems too emotional to be a long-term winner.
(Innit)?
Love the sympathy attempt (Anti-depressants).
Seems too emotional to be a long-term winner.
(Innit)?
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539