Stewards Ripon

FALSE ALARM hugo ydc.

and there is a stewards

cant see any change

1.16?  if that gets disq im packing the game in.

i managed to lay the 3rd at 12s and 14s small when it reopened , seems a very big price to keep

not twice lol

winning jock saying hopefully we keep it never a good start...hopefully doesnt say that in stwds room

was a 2ft gap between winner and 2nd and non lost any momentum.

someone wants 600's the 3rd.  first two thrown out.

very big price to keep more you look at head on

seen worse 1.05's

800's the 3rd.  when was last time 1st and 2nd got thrown out for nothing ?

Price going up and down, those who backed to hold on, getting a bit moist, and others picking up the moistness.

2nds done nowt rong so 3rd is a million

1.18

betting awol now

Hulk no faking clue again. 3rd no chance

1.31

with respect how could 1 person say yes the 2nd would have won?

winner went 1/2 before suspension ...

last price matched 1.49 on winner...hoover may know something before the rest of us

Wow interesting late drift very odd.

wow revised

that is a very strange decision and the hoover did know

winner placed 3rd abso fckn pmsl.

1.49 / 3.45 / 320.0

the 800 went on the 3rd, last matched 320.  you lose again matthew pmsl

they luv using that hoover

That does look bent.

26k spunked rico ?

Hugo-Hackenbush 27 Jul 26 20:16 
1.16?  if that gets disq im packing the game in.


Bye

Seems a while since we had one of them real late money just before the result announced, someone in the room went to the toilet and passed the message

Obviously someone in the market knew with that late move. How do BF let them get away with it. Felt like someone knew throughout with the strange prices. Wonder who has the inside scoop.

traa

thats 2 left the game in last 24hrs
one over a game of grimage in ire and one over a stewards at ripon on a mon night

typical only night i norm do after 6 is a friday..got home 7-30 thort i'll do last hour.

thats prob one of the worst stewards decisions ive ever witnessed.

microphone hidden in the cactus. 

until they decided they didn't want a Kroenleinia grusonii any more

it appens as ramruna said the harry finlay syndrome ...its very short odds mus be free munny stans ta reason!

just showed hd on 4 times again..yes they gradually drifted left last fur but there was a clear gap between winner and 2nd and non lost any momentum.

Just saw the head on there - that was a terrible decision - Keenan may have deserved a small ban but there is no way the horse deserved to be placed 3rd -

I wasn't sure they'd call an enquiry after first look at head-on
Let alone amend the result
That outcome is not consistent will all recent precedents

watching it again on sky if you didnt no the original result /colours and were told after watching head on there,d been a revised result,you,d be a million to name the ammended 1,2,3 

much you do rico.  way you were talking i'm guessing fool banco punto ..

i done a grand..years ago would have been 10k..

call it 14k then

i only keep 10 in acc.

Horse Racing / Ripon 27th Jul : 1m Hcap
27-Jul-26 20:10    27-Jul-26 20:30    -912.07

Even Alex & Jamie on ATR are stunned at the demotion to 3rd - something not right with the decision

they all went a few yards left..non lost any momentum wotsoever..winner was holding them both.

just simply incredible what they have done.

you will like this

i laid winner. didnt see it. saw the posts about no chance of reversal and went red solely on that

wac

I rarely bet on ATR Courses on the Flat I/R and didn't do so on any races at Ripon.
Just seen the thread and had a look at the finish on RP(no head on).
To say that I am surprised is an understatement

The most ridicolous stewards decision I have seen in years. Connections will surely appeal and must be long odds-on to win it.

I have watched the replay 10 times now and the result simply was not affected.

Sorry to say this, but are stewards generally now trying to do what so many others do in all walks of life? That is, trying to look busy and super clever? They have done the opposite here on both counts!

I will certainly continue to give Ripon a swerve after that

so not 1 in the forum thort there was any danger of a disq..but 3 stewards did..beggars absolute and utter belief tbh.

i dont play on the photos but mfor  those that do  how can you be confident  that  wont happen again?

thornton didnt help anybody including lynch/alex understand it by saying he,d spoken to jock on 3rd who,d told him he deffo would have got the reult if he,d finished 2nd, how could he have been more impeeded/ effected than the 2nd, he was always finishing 3rd had it right off getting 2nd

Dreadful decision……the circus goes on.

the derby fav declared a nonner ,then the reversal  !what next ?

this is the problem nowadays..in running is incredibly difficult..theres very little money in the boxes..every click is done at your overide..last 2f i struggle to win a fiver..incredible eh..gps/bot way ahead of you..only chance i have of a decent return is photo's and stewards..but if its apparent whats won there is 5 figs in the pink the instant it unsuspends..if its tightish and the slo mo comes on you cannot bet the winner even if you pre empt the horses dipping..someone 100% playing with no 1 sec delay..i seen the drift last furlong so didnt play on the photo but i put stewards thread up..then seen the head on and thort yes they have drifted but clear gap between them so wont change..so in effect the stewards have said if they kept in a straight line the winner would have most probably finished 3rd? what absolute and utter nonsense.

Just under 8 bags to the Wnr.Wonder if they'll appeal that result.

Possibly the worst DQ for a long while. I'm all for more amendments when horses are taken off their line but that was ridiculous. 1.01 to be changed on appeal.

Thornton says the stewards have had their say and that's final.   Maybe not for the owners of fptp.

Shocking decision. Gobsmacking. Also the sweep up to 1.49? adds a sour taste, imo.
Photo finishes decided on atomic measurement that look dead heats and now Stewards behaving like this?
Not a chance I'll bet on this post race stuff.
All sorts of shenanigans going on.
It's as random as roulette at worse odds.

Chris Cook:

Racing, if we care enough, provokes vivid emotion and some of it just has to be expressed. That's why I let out a howl of pain in my otherwise empty kitchen when the Ripon stewards crazily demoted Command The Stars (9-2) last night.

https://www.racingpost.com/news/the-front-runner/us-punters-all-addicted-to-goodwood-heartbreak-half-the-time-were-courting-disaster-and-loving-every-minute-of-it-amEaF4s1xJlY/

there was no sweep imo..it had been going over 15 mins and was obv complicated as 3 involved to interview..it was drifting all the last 5 mins..it was 1.4 a few mins before it susp..nothing untoward (imo)

and ive seen many stewards reports lately where they have said 'the winner did not improve its position as there was no contact and no horse lost any momentum'

what was any different last night?

Just seen it on ATR....the 2nd would never have won and if that's the case how would the third have won which didn't come off its racing line at all.

Possibly the worst stewarding decision i've ever seen.Anything above 1.05 to keep was Xmas

1.4 to keep was the best bit of value since 2001

correct.

Judging by yesterday, winner 14.25 Goodwood will be thrown out if stewards called.

In the old days the photo finish was up in the stands on its own above the line, when the result was known a runner went along a walkway at the back of the stands down the stairs in to the crowd and went to the announcer, I did know the runner

steve cram?

Hugo-Hackenbush27 Jul 26 20:16Joined: 05 Apr 25 | Topic/replies: 1,510 | Blogger: Hugo-Hackenbush's blog
1.16?  if that gets disq im packing the game in.
Nose S.F.A aboot the game absolute fakin Muppet.

I suppose the state of the Racing Post these days is summed up with this preceptive analysis

Command The Stars, down in trip, was produced with a winning run but as he edged his way to the front under a right-hand drive he carried his two nearest rivals off a true line and, with the winning margin so narrow, it was no great surprise that he was demoted

Dave Bellingham

Note to self -don't bother reading the analysis.

"perceptive analysis"

Dave thought "it was no great surprise" when Leicester won the Premier League

carried his two nearest rivals off a true line

with a 18" gap between winner and 2nd.

wonder if dave laid enni 1.06? fkn clown.