This evening's meeting, 6 races, they got the favourite in every one, as of now 4 different jockeys, Harry's on 3 of them I believe they train nearby? Could go through the card?
Just tried to Google if a trainer had gone through the card, ever I seem to recall it might have happened in the 50s,not that i was there ,but not coming up with anything
Just tried to Google if a trainer had gone through the card, everI seem to recall it might have happened in the 50s,not that i was there ,but not coming up with anything
I seem to recall reading about a jumps trainer having the winner in something like 12 consecutive races over 2 days, at the same track...although maybe ptp
The dealer, that's what I thought re Martin PipeI seem to recall reading about a jumps trainer having the winner in something like 12 consecutive races over 2 days, at the same track...although maybe ptp
The dealer, just found what I was trying to remember It was in 1933, ( Sir) Gordon Richards rode 12 consecutive winners over 3 days, including 6 from 6 at Chepstow on the middle day...doesn't say if there were only 6 races on that day, though
The dealer, just found what I was trying to remember It was in 1933, ( Sir) Gordon Richards rode 12 consecutive winners over 3 days, including 6 from 6 at Chepstow on the middle day...doesn't say if there were only 6 races on that day, though
The mule in the 7.48 race is a 46 times raced maiden he's inherited from Ireland. Hardly looks well in given what it has achieved. HTF is it a 6/4 poke
The mule in the 7.48 race is a 46 times raced maiden he's inherited from Ireland.Hardly looks well in given what it has achieved.HTF is it a 6/4 poke
Regbutler30 Jun 26 09:23Joined: 09 Mar 21 | Topic/replies: 4,906 | Blogger: Regbutler's blog The dealer, just found what I was trying to remember It was in 1933, ( Sir) Gordon Richards rode 12 consecutive winners over 3 days, including 6 from 6 at Chepstow on the middle day...doesn't say if there were only 6 races on that day, though Rate reply: | reportblock user
Reg, i seem to remember the NH trainer Gordon (W) Richards nearly going through the card at his local track Carlisle back in the day, would have been late 70s 1980 time. He used to have loads of winners there
Regbutler30 Jun 26 09:23Joined: 09 Mar 21 | Topic/replies: 4,906 | Blogger: Regbutler's blogThe dealer, just found what I was trying to rememberIt was in 1933, ( Sir) Gordon Richards rode 12 consecutive winners over 3 days, including 6 from 6 at Chep
RP put the article up with fatboy's chops in large. Every other day they seem to have an article about some guy who has reportedly made a packet from gambling/beating the bookies. Presstitutes for the betting industry except they are worse than ever. journalists just pimps.
RP put the article up with fatboy's chops in large.Every other day they seem to have an article about some guy who has reportedly made a packet from gambling/beating the bookies.Presstitutes for the betting industry except they are worse than ever.jo
I think Richard Hannon won all six races at Bath once over, during the 90s? Just six races per meeting at the time? Pipe had 5/6 at Taunton in 97 Nicholls 6/7 at Wincanton, maybe 2006
I think Richard Hannon won all six races at Bath once over, during the 90s? Just six races per meeting at the time?Pipe had 5/6 at Taunton in 97Nicholls 6/7 at Wincanton, maybe 2006
Think the warning sign was the racing post highlighted it and all falsely short, even the misses had a £1 acca, bookies story they pushed it and he has got some bad uns and owners thinking he can magically turn them into winning machines
Think the warning sign was the racing post highlighted it and all falsely short, even the misses had a £1 acca, bookies story they pushed it and he has got some bad uns and owners thinking he can magically turn them into winning machines
Numbers game isn't it, if they turn over dozens of these types, only a handful need to turn into winning machines at a basement level, and maybe even one or two turn out to be higher quality. If they can get the owners, no reason not to do it. Doesn't strike me as particularly strategic, like the Dixons for example. Just based on churning them though the Skelton cistern.
Numbers game isn't it, if they turn over dozens of these types, only a handful need to turn into winning machines at a basement level, and maybe even one or two turn out to be higher quality. If they can get the owners, no reason not to do it. Doesn'
Their approach doesn't seem to mind if they have a few total flops going through their hands. They have faith in their system making enough of them winners, and there will be some collateral damage. The risk is with the owners, and there doesn't appear to be a shortage of willing participants.
Doing something right, champion trainer approaching 50% strike rate currently!Their approach doesn't seem to mind if they have a few total flops going through their hands. They have faith in their system making enough of them winners, and there will
DifferentDrum^^^ I was only jesting that I had put it up as a lay thread, I'm sure most realised I wasn't advising it as a back bet either, just noting that he had all 6 favs at the meeting...although I would no doubt have aftertimed a fantastic 6 fold if they'd all obliged
As others have said, some very poor runs from some of them, Skelton layers in clover
DifferentDrum^^^I was only jesting that I had put it up as a lay thread, I'm sure most realisedI wasn't advising it as a back bet either, just noting that he had all 6 favs at the meeting...although I would no doubt have aftertimed a fantastic 6 fold
what was rather laughable was the way that the odds reacted after each result. When the first one bombed, the rest all drifted. When the second won they all shortened. What a load of lemmings. Don't they recognise the first rule of roulette? Each spin is independent of the ones that precede it? Or was it astute players like Reg manipulating the markets?
what was rather laughable was the way that the odds reacted after each result. When the first one bombed, the rest all drifted. When the second won they all shortened. What a load of lemmings. Don't they recognise the first rule of roulette? Each spi
youre thinking of frankie dettori at ascot. he rode all seven winners on the card. the last one was backed into 2/1 favourite. the one time the lemmings were right
youre thinking of frankie dettori at ascot. he rode all seven winners on the card. the last one was backed into 2/1 favourite. the one time the lemmings were right