Jun 28, 2026 -- 7:21PM, Cider wrote:
Indicates that the current MOT was undertaken to facilitate the sale.
Many if not most dealers have cars sitting without Mot and only do one once sale agreed.
Jun 28, 2026 -- 9:06PM, breadnbutter wrote:
Jun 28, 2026 -- 7:21PM, Cider wrote:Indicates that the current MOT was undertaken to facilitate the sale.Many if not most dealers have cars sitting without Mot and only do one once sale agreed.
Of course, but for this vehicle and an expired MOT, it would make sense to get a new ticket. We'll see if the OP is able to identify, but my money would be on the most recent ticket being in a different location to the past ones. How would the dealer have got hold of the vehicle, for example.
You get a feel for things and a single owner car for 20+ years, consistently getting tickets on time wouldn't decide to sell or trade in the car with a lapsed MOT, and wouldn't miss one (unless they knew it would fail). Especially if the service record stacks up. The clue is basically that I knew that the MOT history would have a red flag, before viewing it.
Jun 28, 2026 -- 9:57PM, uptheirons wrote:
Were there a pair of white stilettos in the back?
A must in the 70-80,s
Jun 30, 2026 -- 10:56AM, Cider wrote:
I feel (from the evidence shared) that atn's dealer isn't a wrong 'un, but perhaps took short cuts. If the vehicle looks as good as the OP says, and drives well, he might have just chucked it through a MOT for sale, and not lifted it or done a thorough go over. It will cost him, now. The one niggle of course is how it passed the MOT (if it was a straight one).
He has a small service area with a ramp at side of showroom and employs a mechanic - he was the one who slapped the underseal on over the rust.
Think they knew how bad it was.