wtf is that set up ,11 runners so 4 stalls on rail the rest stalls off track and 7 horses in other stalls, so 7 horses are disadvantaged by the gap of 2 stalls,when it could have just 4
wtf is that set up ,11 runners so 4 stalls on rail the rest stalls off track and 7 horses in other stalls, so 7 horses are disadvantaged by the gap of 2 stalls,when it could have just 4
you could have had 10 horses in one block and just one horse disadvantaged by been in the others block and in theory drawn 3 away from the nearest horse
you could have had 10 horses in one block and just one horse disadvantaged by been in the others block and in theory drawn 3 away from the nearest horse
when ever you get 2 sets of stalls ,horses in one block disadvantaged by been in theory 2 stall,s wider than there actually draw, so where is the logic in deliberatly disadvantaging 4 horses when they can just disadvantage one
when ever you get 2 sets of stalls ,horses in one block disadvantaged by been in theory 2 stall,s wider than there actually draw, so where is the logic in deliberatly disadvantaging 4 horses when they can just disadvantage one
3 months ago pundits were bedwetting about horse losing 2 lengths in 3 mile Chase at chelt, a horse has just lost 20 lengths in a 5f race with a flag start, nothing to see next 11 runners down to 9 and only 4 could ever win,come racing folks
3 months ago pundits were bedwetting about horse losing 2 lengths in 3 mile Chase at chelt, a horse has just lost 20 lengths in a 5f race with a flag start, nothing to see next 11 runners down to 9 and only 4 could ever win,come racing folks