|
By:
wd werbie
|
|
By:
Thank you Foyles.
Will try and get "I'll be back" at shorter odds in the next. Poor time, form looks ok but against what appears to be an AW horse. |
|
By:
good luck again werbie
|
|
By:
Well got it short but one step forward 2 back
![]() |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Will try and get Jakajaro short
|
|
By:
Got it short
![]() |
|
By:
if you had waited long enough you could have layed at 1.01
|
|
By:
werbie, have you read the book 'trading like hulk, win when they win(no lay), win when they lose(big lay)'?
|
|
By:
Avg 2.35
|
|
By:
Saw the book in WH Smith.Im not paying £108 for a book
|
|
By:
swiftynifty Joined: 16 Jan 07
Replies: 1453214 Apr 26 15:47 werbie, have you read the book 'trading like hulk, win when they win(no lay), win when they lose(big lay)'? Must be a best seller ![]() Hulk proclaimed yesterday that laying under the odds will leave you in clover. So its shirley only a matter of time before my thread shows a handsome profit ![]() |
|
By:
7.00 Hereford Red Rubio. Poor finisher. Don't think he'll have the gears for this. 4.2 and hopefully shorter in the run
|
|
By:
Nice lay Werbie.
![]() |
|
By:
Cheers Glasgow. Wish it was Hereford every day
![]() |
|
By:
Oykel Bridge could rout these or be all at sea. I'm hoping for the latter 2.64 and shorter in run
|
|
By:
Just the one tonight. Regal Cavalier 7.10 Exeter has won a race in France and that could be it. Looks very limited. 4 and hopefully shorter in run
|
|
By:
have you layed at 4 and laying shorter too?
|
|
By:
nicely done werbie.
|
|
By:
layed at 4 nothing doing at shorter
|
|
By:
raced a bit keenly early and found nothing
|
|
By:
taking on Crack ops 3.02 Bangor 3.2 and hopefully shorter in run
|
|
By:
3.50 Epsom I think Night Breeze prefers a sounder surface. Try and get it shorter
|
|
By:
3.57 Yarm Pershalla would prefer slower conditions. Likely that one of 2 longest price horses will win it
|
|
By:
Ice Jet 4.45 Hereford currently 2.38 Can see this trading much higher in the run.
|
|
By:
Still a maiden and yet to shine on a quick surface.
|
|
By:
Got that very wrong. Different class
![]() |
|
By:
Next Twist 14.33 Surely not
|