|
By:
2.36 x .75= 1.77
|
|
By:
Not quite Dave1357. Thats including the stake. To apply a 25% deduction the correct calculation is 1.36 x 0.75 = 1.02
|
|
By:
The BF RF does include the stake,JRAS
|
|
By:
Taking that logic further, if a long odds on favourite is withdrawn and there is an 75% R4 you could get less than your stake back. r4 should not include the stake. I will have a look at BFs R4 rules
|
|
By:
It was introduced to encourage Layers to the Exchange
|
|
By:
What is Rule 4?
Rule 4 covers the situation where a horse is withdrawn from a race, the odds for all bets placed on remaining horses are adjusted to account for the non-runner(s). This is because less horses in a race increases the probability of each remaining horse winning. A Rule 4 is normally expressed as x pence in the pound, and is an industry-wide rule. If you'd like to find out more information about non-runners, see our article here. In the picture above this which it will not allow me to cut and paste, it states that Rule 4 is deducted as a percentage of winnings. ie. it does not include the stake |
|
By:
Tattersalls Rule 4 is for bookmakers.
Betfair betting exchange is not a bookmaker and uses its own Reduction Factor. |
|
By:
got to be a fishing thread - 22 years on betfair and he doesn't understand that the exchange doesn't operate rule 4 but implements a reduction factor
|
|
By:
unhook me please.
|
|
By:
Anybody got a disgorger
![]() |
|
By:
You think thats bad, I placed a bet yesterday with required odds of 1.72. There was a withdrawel with a reduction of 53.3%, my bet now became 1.01. So I have a 50 euro bet to win which gives me 50cent profit if it wins. I asked Betfair about this since no right minded person would back a horse at 1.01 but that is correct to their calculations. If it was with a bookmaker it would have a new odds of aprox 1.35. This exposes the backer to extreme odds...so much so that i would question the logic of using Betfair
|