|
By:
You can get 4/5 the 2 horse to finish in the top two
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Profits need to be maximised.
|
|
By:
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
All that shoe leather
|
|
By:
slickster, ring forum helpdesk, try and get this taken down.
|
|
By:
or this thread could live long.
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
It'll probably pay nearer evens now I think about it. Fill yer wellies. Practically zero risk.
|
|
By:
A straight f/c, one to beat two at an indeterminable price of somewhere between 4/6 and Evens.
Or the two horse to finish in first or second place at 4/5. I know which I’d do if I had to. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
The best that was on offer when I looked earlier was about 1.50!
|
|
By:
the big problem with this race is the bookies csf is based on the dirty ew sp of the second fav, so there's no way there can be value in the csf in this race. slicksters other "bets" were in win only fields I think.
|
|
By:
Are we pronouncing slick correctly?
|
|
By:
slick berates a tipster on a daily basis for tipping odds on shots, then sticks one up on here ! thats irish logic for you
|
|
By:
Correct, Dave. Three runners I think, the rag around 25/1-40/1.
|
|
By:
Looks like it's a winner as the thread died. Csf 1.79. So 4-5 about a 1-7 shot. MAXIMISES profits. As easy as abc. Few on here don't seem to understand the threads logic. 2l 4l. No danger. I would rather have 4-5 than 1-7. More shops visited today as time on my side. I do concede I need a new pair of leather sneakers. Hope some had the brains to get on. Til the next one...
|
|
By:
nice work slick...just a shame you didn't follow dave in...could've saved the shoes.
|
|
By:
The Dickster
![]() |
|
By:
I like to keep things simple around the shops. No point doing what would be a technical bet for them. Keep under a certain amount and you won't get nabbed.
|
|
By:
2.3 it was on here, hope you got on
|
|
By:
Regretably for Dickster,Fantasy ]sland winnings do not count
|
|
By:
slickster • March 25, 2026 8:00 PM GMT
Keep under a certain amount and you won't get nabbed. If you make a habit of putting on forecasts on races with dead eight runners and an odds-on fav, they'll only be nabbing you to put more on. |
|
By:
Classical Allusion just to place was 1.91 SP.
You got 1.79 CSF predicting 1st to beat 2nd. And you think that was a good bet? ![]() |
|
By:
Dave trying to give me advice. That's funny. Have you worked out the difference between 5 lengths or more and over 5 lengths yet?
|
|
By:
I think ANY winning bet is a good bet jamee. The majority of my bets are placed in a few shops. Hope this helps.
|
|
By:
Oh dear.
|
|
By:
slickster • March 25, 2026 8:48 PM GMT
I think ANY winning bet is a good bet jamee. The majority of my bets are placed in a few shops. Hope this helps. The comments of a raving lunatic ![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Keep betting they forecasts you will walking along the high street's in your bare Feet
|
|
By:
slickster, you still can't seem to grasp why it was a bad bet and reflected in the alternate bets quoted. The race was a classic dirty ew 8 runner race and that means the bookies massively reduce sps of likely placers to stop ew betting being profitable. Your forecast is based on that massivly reduced sp. Your other "steal forecasts" weren't on these type of races, so not obviously bad bets.
|
|
By:
Angela I rarely bet on here. Not playing against the green bots chasing my tail. If I have to take slightly less so be it.
Seven not got one wrong yet. I'm happy to get 4-5 against 1-7. The thread is called "another steal forecast". Dave I well understand what you're saying. I'm taking a little less but 4-5 or 10-11 less commission is roughly the same. Its also a bit of fun. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
slickster 25 Mar 26 16:03
7.30 Kempton. Instead of ploughing in on Constitution hill at 1-6, you back the 1 to beat 2 forecast. This ensures the guts of 4-6 8-11 odd. Profits need to be maximised. 4-6 sounds better than 1-6 to me. Easy dollars. dave1357 25 Mar 26 16:10 You can get 4/5 the 2 horse to finish in the top two abso pmsl...4/6 the fc and its 4/5 to finish in top 2...what a fckn calamity from the forums fake lePRICKhorn ![]() |
|
By:
slickster 25 Mar 26 16:03
7.30 Kempton. Instead of ploughing in on Constitution hill at 1-6, you back the 1 to beat 2 forecast. This ensures the guts of 4-6 8-11 odd. Profits need to be maximised. 4-6 sounds better than 1-6 to me. Easy dollars. Angela Rebecchi 25 Mar 26 20:07 2.3 it was on here, hope you got on slickster 25 Mar 26 21:32 Angela I rarely bet on here. Not playing against the green bots chasing my tail. trapesing the streets of dublin betting f/c's at 4/5 whilst siting in your own home its available at 2.3..of course ewe needs funds to be able to bet on here... Díckster..probably the greatest fantasist currently in the forum now that toibymugs went awol...#WAC LOL |
|
By:
enni 1.9's today thats available at 2.3 please Dickster? 🤡
|
|
By:
He hit the jackpot in that 3 horse race at Warwick.....6 100 pounders sf to cover all eventuality s
|
|
By:
The csf was 1.79 you abosolute dope. You can't be betting. Surely. You will notice how slick avoided the 1st at Warwick as "a steal forecast". Wasn't falling into that obvious trap. No seething now frico.
|
|
By:
Hey ri-coco the clown is judge iron still sitting on your knee?
|