There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
20 Feb 26
14:17
Joined:
Date Joined:
13 Jun 06
if that's deemed a runner going to be problems
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 18
|
By:
It did attempt to start and then the jockey gave up, he should've really jumped off or faced the other way
|
|
By:
If its deemed a non-runner there are going to be more problems.
|
|
By:
starter an utter idiot
|
|
By:
surely must be a non runner
|
|
By:
Sense it won't be a NR and the starter has had a shocker.
|
|
By:
only a complete idiot lets them go with 1 behind 10l
|
|
By:
Has to be a runner imo, the fact he decided to start going forward does it for me
|
|
By:
starter denied the horse a fair start
|
|
By:
If it is declared a nr later bookies will have paid out without R4 and also 3 places EW
|
|
By:
i laid it and hope to get paid but should not be
|
|
By:
nr and brutal reduction on the 3rd in the place. 49>17
|
|
By:
Declared a NR, bookies will be happy
 Personally think that's the wrong decision, probably done this so the starter doesn't get a kicking for being useless |
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
I was taking the p1ss, concourse probably paid out and loads of others would've paid out.
Crazy decision to make that a NR |
|
By:
enquiry was called early if books paid out early after what played out more fool them
|
|
By:
enquiry was called early
that's the only good thing about this incident |
|
By:
seems stewards bailed out starter by acting quickly
|