There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Victims as young as 2, sexually abused by this vile individual
Plus loads of other offences
How on earth does he get only 18 years? Should be life, imo
Plus loads of other offences
How on earth does he get only 18 years? Should be life, imo
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 10
|
By:
He had previous REG.
From 2007 he worked in IT support and a teaching assisdant,where committed multiple upskirting offences. During this period he also installed hidden cameras at his home & sexually assaulted a woman while she slept. |
|
By:
Carrier bag over the head,then off again a few times let him suffer....
|
|
By:
He should be put down, no reforming of an individual like that is possible. The money saved from not paying to keep in prison can be spent on children with disabilities or other worthwhile causes.
Same applies to the 15 year old monster that stabbed a 13 year old and enjoys hurting people. Attacked 3 elderly women and caused severe injuries to 2 of them, and through one of them in a river. Complete sadist, beyond any type of therapy or treatment. If they release him at the end of his sentence, the poor 13 year old lad will not be his only murder victim. |
|
By:
Should be put down, impossible to reform a character like this. Same applies to the the 15 year old sadist that stabbed the poor 13 year old lad, he said he enjoys hurting people. Had previously attacked 3 elderly ladies and severely hurt 2 of them and through one in a river. Irrespective of whether he is 15 or not, if he is man enough to do the crime then he should face the ultimate penalty.
|
|
By:
11kv ,agree, but the do gooders always think scum like this can be rehabilitated , like they've just had a bad upbringing, and they'll change
They won't, just throw away the key |
|
By:
Just bring back hanging.
I mean...how the f 8 ck is the Stockport killer allowed to live? Or the ones who beheaded someone in London a few years ago? If you are irrefutably caught in the act of murder then death should be the consequence. |
|
By:
He must serve at least 10 yrs. Then if no pro-evidence arises in his favour he ought to have his eyes gouge out to prevent him from re-offending again post completion of the sentence.
The bloke must not be allowed to have his sight back post sentence. It's a vile crime. |
|
By:
Agreed, Hatters.
Any vile, sadistic paedos/murderers who are 100% guilty should face the death penalty. Immediately too, not ten years later. |
|
By:
Welcome to hell.
|
|
By:
I’ll refrain from typing my thoughts…..don’t want plod at my door.
|