Stewards Leicester

has won been called?   the interference at wolves the other night was less distance out

13:30
Leicester
Settled Result
Thursday 4th December 2025

horse disq for exactly same cupple weeks ago..incredible.

The interference at wolves didn't involve almost knocking the other one off its feet.  And then beating it a few centimetres in a photo.

Whys the runner up not objecting ??

If he objects he must win.

Fake news

i remember sire de grugy jumping across special tiara at last and keeping race in a tingle creek

there was a horse few weeks ago disq for doing exactly what the winner done today.

At the second last hurdle the winner, ONE EYE ON VEGAS, jumped left-handed slightly impeding CAST'S TASHA (IRE), placed second. After viewing a recording of the incident, it was found that no riding offence was involved and that it had not improved the placing of ONE EYE ON VEGAS.

won by a fast diminishing nose.  broadsiding the one that was catching it causing it to lose momentum and track position did not improve it's placing.  it won by a nose. 

eh ??

Dec 4, 2025 -- 2:00PM, Rico-Dangleflaps wrote:

there was a horse few weeks ago disq for doing exactly what the winner done today.

where was that? do you remember the race?

they admit it slightly impeded it, but then say that did not improve it's placing.

it won a nose.  did the "slightly impede" cause it less than a nose, a half nose maybe ??

jumped across 2nd and jock had to slightly check..beaten an inch.

beggars utter belief what goes on ev day.

if you win by a nose, and cause any kind of 'impediment' to the other one, you have to be disqualified don't you ??

At the second last hurdle the winner, ONE EYE ON VEGAS, jumped left-handed slightly impeding CAST'S TASHA (IRE), placed second.

beaten 1 inch...abso fkn pmsl.

are they sitting there saying yeah he's definitely impeded him, but the winners ultimately held on by a nose so there's no way it's improved his position.

whys the jockey not objected ?  into the stewards room, so we agree the winners impeded me.  and we agree i've gone down by a nose.

end of discussion.

im relieved they didnt call an inq as i never noticed it live..would 100% have been disq if called.

couldn't miss it, was a significant broadside which was also picked up by the commentator.

not the "slightly impeding" BS noted in the stewards report.

Luckily you are not a steward hulk, you need specsavers, there was no contact. hth

[   This image is no longer available.   ]

knocked it's head to one side, causing it to lose it's back end.  loss of momentum, and track position.  and almost certainly costing it more than the losing distance of an inch.


you lost again Cag !!! will you never learn

hth

They never touched Hulk, winner was in clear space but never mind if you think you win, I got the 7/2 on the winner and paid out even if there had been a disqual!!

jumped left-handed slightly impeding CAST'S TASHA (IRE)

^^ the stewards agree with me Cag.  so you've lost again, that's twice.  how much more can you take.

if you win by a nose, even if you slightly impede the other one, it has to be a disqualification.  doesn't it ? 

you impeded the other one,  and won by the length of a kit-kat.

You have not a clue as well as being blind hulk, impeded merely means that the winner crossed in front of the 2nd, never touched it but no doubt you can provide a definitive side on photo?

no, but it sounds like you can to prove your point

the stewards have admitted it impeded the runner up.  slightly or otherwise it's in the report.
they have also determined this cost the 2nd less than a nose, by allowing the fptp to keep the race.

If it happens at the first or second Hurdle should it be disqualified?

Lost the same distance, beaten the same distance

Why not just stick to facts, you said it was a massive broadside and claim the stewards agree with you. Best just leave it before you dig any deeper, sorry you lost your bet and would have still been happy had it been a massive broadside and a disqual and you getting paid as well.

[   This image is no longer available.   ]




CagliariG 04 Dec 25 14:42

Luckily you are not a steward hulk, you need specsavers, there was no contact. hth

well done tobymugs..wonce again confirmation as the forums greatest ever fantasist and cluelessknt

[   This image is no longer available.   ]

CagliariG 04 Dec 25 14:42

Luckily you are not a steward hulk, you need specsavers, there was no contact. hth

WAC

No contact visible there shafter but speaking of clueless fantasists. Who started the thread and then said they never saw the race live and was then relieved that a Stewards had not been called? ROFL

crossed the 2nd jumping the hurdle and knocked it sideways...but tobymugs sez 'no contact'

ewe really are a clueless SOC.

And you are a genius that states a Stewards when there is none and yet never noticed it live, suggest you watch the replay multiple times and ask why the stewards disagree with you and hulk?

I had a small bet on the 2nd,as hulk and rico said,it 100% crossed its path jumping the hurdle and 100% made contact with it knocking it off balance,i fully expected a stewards and a simple reversal.
To not even call a stewards yet they looked into it and made a report is beyond belief.
And CagliariG you really need to stop commenting on these things because you're embarrassing yourself.

To not even call a stewards yet they looked into it and made a report is beyond belief.

exactly..why mention it if wernt relevant?

If you say so Hacken, myself and the stewards can probably live with being right with better eyesight than you and your cohorts, the 7/2 makes it bearable. lol

CagliariG 04 Dec 25 14:54 
I got the 7/2 on the winner

yeah yeah corse ewe did ya silleekhúnt.

Horse Racing / Market Rasen 4th Dec : 2m7f Hcap Hrd
04-Dec-25 13:50    04-Dec-25 13:59    4.06
Horse Racing / Wincanton 4th Dec : 2m5f Nov Hrd
04-Dec-25 13:40    04-Dec-25 13:48    16.32
Horse Racing / Leicester 4th Dec : 2m4f Hcap Hrd
04-Dec-25 13:30    04-Dec-25 13:38    1,204.41
Horse Racing / Market Rasen 4th Dec : 2m4f Nov Hrd
04-Dec-25 13:20    04-Dec-25 13:29    5.91
Horse Racing / Leicester 4th Dec : 2m6f Nov Hcap Chs
04-Dec-25 13:00    04-Dec-25 13:08    47.48

why didnt ewe top up in foto tobymugaryliar?

Would you like double or quits for the photo shafter, for the £5K you already owe for being wrong 100% against me?

forums greatest ever bluffing aftertimer.

5/6 tobymugaryliar
5/6 stewartyB

Never once bluffed unlike you shafter which is why you are a 100% loser when it comes to proofs, do you want to call my bluff with double or nothing?

Bet placed 00.49.17 btw!!

think you're slightly missing the point Cag.

the stewards themselves, not me, not rico, the stewards have reported that interference took place between the first two home.

but they deemed that interference did not cost the runner up a nose.  which was the winning distance.

we can all see from the pictures the runner up was turned sideways.  that alone, must have cost it more than a nose.

dingwall was chucked out the other night for much less, much further out.  some on here had to watch the replay 5 or 6 times to actually see what it had done.  you don't need to look at those pictures 5 or 6 times to see the runner up has been impeded by the winner jumping across it.

Not missing any point hulk nor I am making up words to fit a narrative that suits, where does it say "Interference"?

they said it slightly impeded the runner-up.

and it only beat the runner-up by a nose.

so therefore it had to be disqualified. 

if they'd been a bit more savvy they wouldn't have said it impeded the runner up in their report, as you are suggesting it didn't.

Btw you are correct when you say the winner jumped across and slightly impeded the runner up but had there been a massive broadside as you and shafter claim there would have been a disqualification after a Stewards, clear daylight between them and no contact as the Stewards concluded with side on view.

but, it impeded the runner up, per the Stewards - which we can all see and we can all agree on - and only beat the runner up by a nose. 

so it has to be disqualified. 

end of.

I laid the winner for 500.at 2.02.....a bit annoyed at the sheer ineptitude of the English stewards..

It is a bit odd that the 2nd didn't object....

fck in USA, jockeys object seconds after the winning line..

CagliariG 04 Dec 25 16:02 
Btw you are correct when you say the winner jumped across and slightly impeded the runner up but had there been a massive broadside as you and shafter claim

please allude to where myself or hulk have menchunned the word 'massive'.

ewe calgaryliarmug are a 'massive' aftertimer and a 'massive' fantasist and a 'massive'
liar though.

They don't run or jump in lanes so in nearly every race horses will jump across and impede other horses. So where do you draw the line? How far back do you go, 2nd last, 3rd last, 4th last?

Had it been the last would they have acted differently?

Probably they would have

i think it's all too palsy walsy here to object.  they're like we would get the race, but my aunt marjorie's boffing the trainers cousins golden retriever and i wouldn't want to upset anyone.

To not even call a stewards yet they looked into it and made a report is beyond belief.

exactly..why mention it if wernt relevant?

tom,few weeks back the winner jumped right on take off and hmp the 2nd...it was disq.

The 2nd was ridden by a claimer.

Maybe not keen to object....

2 from home is close enough to the finish,  with a nose on the line to throw the winner out.

Imo every other racing country would have chucked the first past the post and it wouldn't have taken long..

Yes I agree but can you compare one set of stewards to another. Seen plenty jump across at the last and not change.
Had that happened a Hurdle or two before, would you expect a stewards and possible change ?

Every other country doesn't have our rules though

Would be better with central stewards for consistency....Racing VAR..

Dingwall connections must be bemused.....a lay tonight, surely...

if you win any race in the uk by a nose, and you've interfered (impeded, call it what you want) with the runner-up (as stated by the stewards themselves) at any point in the race (one the other night was about 3 furlongs out), you must surely lose the race. 

would that not be a fairy simple decision ?

100% you might still get the odd bad decision but surely far more consistency and more cost effective

When has any stewards decision been simple ?

In this instance I don't agree, jumping across happens loads of times  it's not the same imo of horses drifing across on the flat

That's fine,  but the imbeciles didn't even call an inquiry....They should be disciplined for not doing their job....

Race 9 - 8:30pm
THE JOIN THE MIDNITE MOVEMENT HANDICAP STAKES (CLASS 6)

An enquiry was held to consider the placings in this race after interference approximately 3 furlongs out, when the winner DINGWALL, ridden by Cara Tuke, interfered with RATING (IRE)(IRE), placed second, ridden by Jack Dace. Being a 7lb apprentice, Tuke was accompanied in the enquiry by a senior rider. The Stewards considered that the interference had improved the placing of DINGWALL as although the interference occurred approximately 2½ furlongs out, it was substantial in nature with RATING losing both significant ground and momentum. As a consequence of the interference, RATING (IRE) then had to switch right-handed for clear running and having turned into the home straight, proceeded to close strongly through to the line to be beaten an ever-diminishing nose. The Stewards were therefore satisfied that on the balance of probabilities, that had the interference not occurred, RATING would have finished in front of DINGWALL and therefore revised the placings as follows: First RATING (IRE), Second DINGWALL, Third REVICH, Fourth WHITELEY WAY. Tuke was suspended for 4 days for careless riding as she had moved left-handed when insufficiently clear of Dace, causing him to be badly hampered against the rail.

monday night just as they past the 3f marker dingwall edged to the rail and imo slightly checked the runner up imo costing it mebbe 1 yard.

the stewards report said >  it was substantial in nature with RATING losing both significant ground and momentum.  absolute nonsense.

so if you're approaching the last fence and you sense a rival challenging on ya left you just jump in front of it.  and that's all ok cos its jump racing and they're not on rails guv.

Hulk having a sensible conversation with you is impossible, so I will bow out from your nonsense and my God there is plenty of that to see

eye conquer wiv hulk.