There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Stands.
Even Dave Yates knows this one.
Even Dave Yates knows this one.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 36
|
By:
1.34 to keep
|
|
By:
Git to go surely
|
|
By:
Jolly started it by bumping and hanging into FPP. Was getting the worst of it anyway.
|
|
By:
Would the 2nd have won....no...simple....might have but more than likely would have finished where it finished.(2nd)
|
|
By:
Agreed
|
|
By:
Red one came across and instigated the bumping
Blue one bullied it back Jockey did what he could |
|
By:
Should keep it, but ive taken my stake back....I laid the fav pre race....I jumped to early too..took 3s on the 2nd...
|
|
By:
Billy’s argument should be that the winner became unrideable, and if he’d been on the far side of it and run straight to the line, while the winner swerved violently left, he would certainly have won.
|
|
By:
Like keep @ 2/5
|
|
By:
'certainly have won' really?
|
|
By:
If Billy had kept his hosts straight there would have been no bumping.
|
|
By:
The Kempton Stewards have plenty of "previous".
Good luck if you are involved |
|
By:
Hoss
|
|
By:
fair price-win or lose (should be shorter to me)
|
|
By:
stands
|
|
By:
Keeps it
|
|
By:
They got one right
|
|
By:
Most of us knew it
|
|
By:
Cost me 45 per cent of my profit, but the British stewards cannot be trusted....better safe than sorry...
|
|
By:
Bluebird - i was saying what Billy’s argument should be to the stewards.
Having said that, the current rules are quite ridiculous - any horse that causes that much interference to its main rival should be thrown out, regardless. As it is, if the winner causes minor interference and wins a short head, he gets thrown out, but if he completely mullers a horse and therefore wins a length, he keeps it. |
|
By:
Yes, appreciate that fairweather, wasn't having a go at you.
|
|
By:
I am happy to take a view on Kempton NH Race Stewards but wouldn't go near the AW Meetings
|
|
By:
If I had backed the second, I would have been upset. The horse was out of control.
|
|
By:
Good of you to say, Bluebird. No offence taken.
|
|
By:
Good of you to say, Bluebird. No offence taken.
|
|
By:
2nd bmp winner initially..then winner decides to veer left ..takes 2nd with it for 6-7yds and wins cosy...imo impossible to say 2nd would have won so benefit of doubt had to go with winner.
|
|
By:
Not something the Kempton Stewards have done on a regular basis in the past,Rico.
|
|
By:
was the result affected ? no.simple as that.
|
|
By:
You can have my share on the AW there,TTT
 |
|
By:
was the result affected ? no.simple as that.
impossible to know for certain..were level when winner veered. |
|
By:
Having watched the race this morning I think it was a dreadful decision not to chuck it out tbh….
Havlin was dreadful…… |
|
By:
they make decisions based on the rules ".. impossible to say 2nd would have won so benefit of doubt had to go with winner." Rico correct again.
|
|
By:
I refer to the Dingwall decision,they do what they like.
Pi ssed up on free drinks and a decent buffet. |
|
By:
Carte Blanche to take any rival out providing you create enough carnage to put some distance between you and the 2nd and then yer keep it.
|
|
By:
Havlin didnt intentionally steer it left yfdsc's...it veered of its own accord,
|
|
By:
Hes the fecking driver,horse size of brain is a pea.
Ok i get your point  |