|
By:
most punters would lose the mint if they laid horses on here
|
|
By:
Variance
|
|
By:
Always worht laying Roger's overbet nags
|
|
By:
It all depends if the layers lay only one hoss in a race, or most of them. If the latter, then it is swings and roundabouts: red on the winner but green on all the others they've laid in the same race.
This is, after all, traditionally how the game is played. |
|
By:
It is not the same playfield on here however you play and you know it. I've held a bookies permit in the past btw.
|
|
By:
fundalk 1st 3 races 13,55,110
![]() |
|
By:
1st race newky 46
![]() |
|
By:
nobody is finding those
|
|
By:
last race southwell 50.0 good luck backers !
|
|
By:
First race winner pays 70.0. good luck today lads !
|
|
By:
enjoy the last at Newcastle last night tiger ?
![]() |
|
By:
winner was 7/4 into 5/4. i layed at 6/4. also layed two others in the race. 6/1 - 9/2 (5/1 for me) and 7/1 - 5/1 (6/1) so half a point gained, ending another successful day.
|
|
By:
i do believe the winner was a good deal bigger earlier in the day though, so definitely a "gamble landed"
|
|
By:
14 lays today so far. paid out twice. 7/2 and 6/4. cant beat the maths !
|
|
By:
regents stroll 9/4 - 15/8, layed at 2/1 bites the dust
|
|
By:
tapley 5/2 hammered into 13/8, finishes a close up 4th
|
|
By:
independent jimmy 11/4 into 2/1.... yawn
|
|
By:
So in the newc race if you laid each to say £100 and either of the other two won it would have been £300 or £400 loss ?
|
|
By:
top price i lay is 6/1. £40 stakes at the moment. max loss on a race is £240. it does happen, but my bank can take a fair few of those. most of the winners are under 3/1.
|
|
By:
interesting you had a short price fav as a winner rather than a break even or loss. But Keatley horses I am careful with maybe you too.
|
|
By:
i dont do form, trainers or jockeys. its all a numbers game to me. how accurate is the market at the off ? how accurate is the market a few mins before the off. and yet horses can be 30-40% different in price between the 2 time points.
|
|
By:
scores on the doors.... 28 lays, 4 winners, 6/4, 7/2, 3/1 and 9/2 (ouch!) +11.5 x £40 = ? a very good day! Better luck tomorrow backers, maybe you'll pull a bit back ?
![]() |
|
By:
Rico will be asking you to do something shortly
![]() |
|
By:
Well done TTT. Your system isn't a million miles away from that used by poster Happysandwich some time ago which he also said was profitable I think he layaing at less than 6/1 if they had won their last race or someting along those lines.
|
|
By:
I think Happysandwich system was to lay any runner in a race whose form figures going into it were 21, providing it was the only such runner in the race.
|
|
By:
think you're not quite getting where Tiger is coming from guys. His only thinking is price is everything.
|
|
By:
I get that howard, i was simply replying to brian
|
|
By:
Thanks Bettysboy but although I understand the difference, they share 2 key similarities:
1. They both lay at the top end of the market (up to 6/1) 2. They both work on circumstances that generally rely means that "selections" are overbet. HS on latest form figures and TTT on the lemming factor. |
|
By:
No clues from the tiger
Looks like drift in last few mins by the prices |
|
By:
A good day for the backers.They pulled £8 back.
|
|
By:
backers doing ok at lingers so far. layers of the gosden horse could have greened up nicely
|
|
By:
3 well backed shorties at lingers. i keep the shorties onside.
|
|
By:
yes can be a good policy. I suppose you will often lay ones that many think are ew savers but ok as long as they don't win
|
|
By:
i havnt layed a winner above 13/8 today. 13 well backed over 2/1 all beaten
|
|
By:
just as i say that, layed bownder 3/1
|
|
By:
newcastle 50.0 winner beats my lay 9/4
|
|
By:
I always say that's the kind of result that keep bookies in rolls royce's. Strongly backed fav finishes 2nd not beaten by fancied opponents but by a likely skinner.
|
|
By:
12.30 ling result has put the petrol in the Roller
|
|
By:
yeah just the same. Sometimes what layers have running for them is not horses that have run a lot with placed form...but have run very little and shown nowt.
|