Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
penhead
15 Oct 25 18:36
Joined:
Date Joined: 17 Jul 07
| Topic/replies: 142 | Blogger: penhead's blog
Closing 28 shops in Ireland with more to come. England  over 50in the pipe line

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 44
By:
Regbutler
When: 15 Oct 25 18:41
5 years, 10 years max, imo... All gone
Hope I'm wrong, but...
I was in my local baldies this morning, 9 until 1030,only 2 others came in, one playing the machines, the other having 50p forecasts on the virtuals... 2 staff... As they say in the states... Do the math
By:
brassneck
When: 15 Oct 25 23:01
if PADDY FLOPS so does BETFAIR,Sad
By:
swiftynifty
When: 15 Oct 25 23:21
what were you doing in there at that time Reg, using the loo?
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 15 Oct 25 23:23
stealing pens for mrs butler to do crosswords.
By:
Regbutler
When: 16 Oct 25 07:34
Swifty ^^^ I was reading the weekend entries in the Post, 5 quid to buy now!, and having a free coffee... Plus putting on a few placepots for the day

There's usually a few other old boys in there to chat about the previous day's racing, football, politics etc, but the numbers dwindling
By:
layingisthewayforward
When: 16 Oct 25 07:50
Amazed there are any left
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 16 Oct 25 13:56
pens?
By:
stu
When: 16 Oct 25 14:08
It's not just gambling though is it - everything moving to online for spending.

As we discussed on the other 'bookies closing shops' posts, it's not exactly anything most of us use anymore either a betting 'shop'.
By:
stu
When: 16 Oct 25 14:09
Apart from maybe for warmth and pens
By:
brassneck
When: 16 Oct 25 14:35
The Bookies offices were packed for the last few days when the story broke that Betfair were only taking singles on football.
The story was wrong ,but it did not help Betfair.
By:
brassneck
When: 16 Oct 25 14:59
And.................The Black suspend on Betfair is also driving customers back to the bookie offices ,but nobody at betfair careSad
By:
stu
When: 16 Oct 25 15:04
driving customers back to the bookie offices

Might be annoying customers, but I see little evidence of the latter claim brass...
By:
freddiewilliams
When: 16 Oct 25 15:06
Brass and his bag of p1sh
By:
freddiewilliams
When: 16 Oct 25 15:07
Anyone working in a bookies shop with little footfall......knows it's over
By:
brassneck
When: 16 Oct 25 18:16
Fred,you are out of touch with reality my friend.go into any bookie office this week and ask what is the topic of conversation.Cry
By:
brassneck
When: 16 Oct 25 18:20
by the way the punters are going in to get the weekend football coupons.hope that helps Shocked
By:
punchestown
When: 16 Oct 25 18:31
Wonder how many of the ones earmarked for closure are literally next door or sharing a building with a boozer because they seem to always do OK.
By:
brassneck
When: 16 Oct 25 18:40
you have to remember most bookies own the property ,online bookies have no property.
and the gambling business is on the run ,being chased by governments.and its only starting IMVHOSad
By:
impossible123
When: 16 Oct 25 18:47
A bookie on the high street today is very different to a bookie of the past.

A high street bookie closed could mean 1 fobt addict or problem gambler less. This is a price worth paying in my book; pedalling "filth" on the high street cannot be justified.
By:
devilsadvocate
When: 16 Oct 25 18:58
Whilst this is no doubt a business decision, is the timing of it maybe to raise awareness to
the chancellor the impact of any gambling tax rises ?
By:
brassneck
When: 16 Oct 25 19:00
I maintain that gambling is not an addiction,i say its the lure of money that is the addiction .
Answer this question.How many punters would keep gambling if all they got was a toy teddy bear when they backed a winner?LaughLaugh
By:
swiftynifty
When: 16 Oct 25 19:15
I follow funfairs up and down the land trying to bag myself a teddy bear in the claw machine, no luck yet sadly.
By:
brassneck
When: 16 Oct 25 19:32
Laugh
By:
impossible123
When: 16 Oct 25 19:38
We're all wired up differently. We react to internal / external stimuli differently eg some not at all, some more, some less and some obsessively leading to an addiction usually when money is involved. 

The lure of money could be more "satisfied" by committing a financial crime eg robbing a bank / scamming / defrauding, etc. I believe an addiction is more to do with the process itself eg fobt - feeding the machine / hitting the button / the attraction of the graphics, symbols, lights and sounds, the surrounding and atmosphere too.
By:
brassneck
When: 16 Oct 25 20:01
internet use,is the new addiction.Shocked
By:
Regbutler
When: 16 Oct 25 21:10
People playing the machines in the bookies or the pub...
Are gamblers who are willing to lose x amount
They have no idea of odds, percentages.. Just want a hit, with making a profit a bonus
Generalising I know but they cannot ever win long term, as we know
I'm not saying I'm better than them, but if I lose money it's down to my bad picks on the horses, not a random pick over which I have no cobtrol
By:
Regbutler
When: 16 Oct 25 21:18
Sorry, that post was meant to indicate how people don't understand how their chances are

I seriously think that most people wouldn't be able to tell you the odds on a coin toss
By:
swiftynifty
When: 16 Oct 25 21:20
which bookie reg? 4/5 each of two?
By:
Regbutler
When: 16 Oct 25 21:27
Swifty
That's basically what they're doing
Imagine all day long offering 4/5,even 10/11 on an even money shot
It's a licence to print money
By:
The Management
When: 17 Oct 25 09:30
Ironically reg, that's not correct.

Roulette is actually about the "best value" bet available to you in a Betting Shop (Assuming it's just the odds that are "fixed" on a Fixed Odds Betting Terminal!).

What actually kills the roulette player is (the massively high) frequency of play, coupled with their (also massively high) propensity for addiction.

I'd be pretty confident that a fella just having just 4 level stake spins/day on black or red would come out ahead (over time) of a fella with the same IQ having just 4 level stake horse bets/day. Because the roulette player is betting into a 103% book and the horse player is likely (on average) betting into a 120%+ book!

Obviously, they'll both typically lose (given enough time and enough plays) - and both approaches will generate some addicts (people that just can't stick to their 4-plays only plan) - but the roulette player (while actually getting the better value) will have a much higher propensity to get addicted and deviate from the plan.

So as I said above, it's the frequency of play, coupled with a high propensity for addiction that kills the machine player (rather than lack of knowledge about odds). The odds are against him but they are still more in his favour than the horse player.
By:
ronnie rails
When: 19 Oct 25 08:57
FRED COULD CLOSE THE LOT.
Ronnie.
By:
The Management
When: 19 Oct 25 10:32
Darwin's theory of natural selection proposes that organisms with heritable traits that are better suited to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce.

Has anyone still got a VCR and/or rented any good films from Blockbusters lately?
By:
impossible123
When: 19 Oct 25 10:54
All this is purely scare-mongering. There will be a reduction in shops and profits too. Nevertheless, this can be marginalised against other sources of their profitable products online. Also, the bookies need high street exposure even if it means it's a loss-leader eg boosting their products online like the supermarkets selling certain items below costs to attract potential customers.

A reduction in high street bookies is inevitable. There are too many shops chasing an ever-decreasing number of customers mainly due to their reluctance to take horseracing bets, and over reliant on fobt. This event is bookies specific; it's self-induced.

Fobt is a scourge to society in general for their addictive damage it causes esp to the players, their families and relatives. Fobt is very addictive given their attraction of a "possible" mega win (a fantasy), and its repetitive nature.
By:
Coneygree1971
When: 19 Oct 25 11:16
I don't think its scaremongering because it is already happening. And I don't think this anti-business gov't minds it one bit. Indeed, I think they would be rather pleased if all the betting shops closed. And then on top of that you have the potential betting restrictions coming in. The direction of travel is very clear:

Labour gov't > Digital ID > bank account > betting account > bank account > Digital ID > Labour gov't.
By:
Coneygree1971
When: 19 Oct 25 11:17
Labour gov't > Digital ID > bank account > betting account > bank account > Digital ID > Labour gov't = COMPUTER SAYS NO!!!
By:
The Management
When: 19 Oct 25 11:24
Coneygree197119 Oct 25 11:17Joined: 22 Apr 25 | Topic/replies: 21 | Blogger: Coneygree1971's blog
Labour gov't > Digital ID > bank account > betting account > bank account > Digital ID > Labour gov't = COMPUTER SAYS NO!!!


Computer has been saying "no" to a lot of people for a long time (regardless of who's in govt)

To be accurate now - you could have stated "computer now says no to some losers (as well as all winners)".
By:
impossible123
When: 19 Oct 25 12:02
Does any high street need a betting shop? Does any high street need a betting shop stuffed with mainly clueless managers who do not know their products?

The present betting shops in the high streets are non-essentials. As such, their reduction or disappearance is inconsequential even to a recreational horseracing punter. I saw an 'ok koral' betting shop in Westfield Shopping ctr when I picked up an iphone 17 from the Apple store. The shop looked pristine but empty from the escalator.

I wholly agree with the present government hig street betting shops and online ones need be taxed according to the digital age. And, it's not the presently low rates of taxation the bookies have been blessed for the last couple of decades.

Pay back time or ship out!
By:
The Management
When: 19 Oct 25 13:09
They've been "shipping out" completely of their own accord (and especially from the Bricks & Mortar model) for a long time tbf. Way before the white-paper and way before somebody eventually (finally!) decided that the 2005 Gambling Act might actually be applicable to the Gambling Industry!

Grabbing a share of the huge and lucrative US market has been their primary focus and their absolute priority for a long time.

It's been a happy coincidence (in terms of attributing blame) and very good optics for them, that since the 2005 Gambling Act suddenly (belatedly) came into force just a few years ago and now the prospect of tax rises; that they had long ago given up on the UK High Street and were already focussed on much bigger international markets.

Does anybody believe that they will actually be opening physical shops in their newly targeted territories (even if regulation is lighter touch and taxes are low)???
By:
Toffeegirl
When: 19 Oct 25 13:12
Its getting to the point where all the enjoyment is being sucked out of it and gambling is becoming a big stigma in society. The online restrictions are bad enough but the constent 'you've been logged in for over an hour now' etc etc just get on your t*ts. What other industry openly discouranges its customers from using its product?
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com