Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Grenade1972
23 Aug 25 15:02
Joined:
Date Joined: 02 Apr 25
| Topic/replies: 269 | Blogger: Grenade1972's blog
Not his best

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 27
By:
Big muff
When: 23 Aug 25 15:16
He must have been watching his other half?
By:
G Hall
When: 18 Sep 25 13:53
Oh dear big drift keeps out the back until race is over, they're good these jocks
By:
lapsy pa
When: 18 Sep 25 13:56
Shocker,reined him back 1st furlong and lost about 5 Ls, no need.
By:
DancingBraveTheBest
When: 18 Sep 25 14:06
Stinks worse than a gone off kipperSad
By:
Theoneandonly
When: 18 Sep 25 14:10
Agree DBTB when they finish up with nobody interested in it or betting on the sport they'll only have themselves to blame.

Tom could have still won that without doing much more to his h'cap mark. The drift spoke volumes.
By:
sageform
When: 18 Sep 25 14:11
Don't forget the trainer.
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 18 Sep 25 14:11
Fahey usually sends a decent team up for Western meeting but it did catch my eye this morning that Oisin Orr had gone to Ponte. Maybe Fahey just wanted to utilise Warren's 5lb claim for the Ayr handicaps?
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 18 Sep 25 14:25
A tough day the Fahey odds-on backers Sad
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 18 Sep 25 14:25
* for the...
By:
sageform
When: 18 Sep 25 14:38
so are you blaming the jockey for both or the poor stable form? 9% winners from 55 runs.
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 18 Sep 25 14:59
If that question is to me then then answer is: I've not blamed anyone for anything. Hth.
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 18 Sep 25 15:03
But as you ask, Fahey hasn't had the best of years by his standards (so far). Of his main Yorkshire training rivals, he's behind Messrs Burke, Johnston, O'Meara and (Tim) Easterby in the trainer standings.
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 18 Sep 25 15:06
* and his old mucker Kevin Ryan too.
By:
sageform
When: 18 Sep 25 15:22
No George, I was addressing anyone who blamed the jockey(s). I did back the Marquand mount in the first but it looked a big unbalanced backward type to me.
By:
sageform
When: 18 Sep 25 15:27
Going is playing havoc with form today.
By:
trumper
When: 18 Sep 25 15:38
anyone who dosent see that the jockey was not at fault in the first hasnt a clue,he gave the winner the run of the race and made up about 8 lengths in 2 furlongs and still doing his best work at the line,if thats not the jockeys fault then what is.and for the record id no bet in the race,some of the rides these horses are getting in maidens are comical,a typicall example was another little runntt yesterday cieran fallon on morshadi,not at all saying he cost him the race or anything like that but they might as well attached a big pillow to the horse for the effort he made and as previous poster said they wonder why the public are detesting the game more and more every day
By:
trumper
When: 18 Sep 25 15:48
was at fault
By:
DancingBraveTheBest
When: 18 Sep 25 15:52
I will have to book myself into Specsavers as I am guilty of thinking Marquand gave the horse an awful ride. Whether it was deliberate or not after the 1st 2 furlongs I knew the fav would struggle to win from the position the jockey had put him in. The betting market before hand dont help as fav drifted and the winner came in in price.
By:
DancingBraveTheBest
When: 19 Sep 25 13:49
What a difference in a ride there by Tom......from the off you could see he was up for it....not like his ride yesterday Sad
By:
uptheirons
When: 19 Sep 25 13:52
Good horses make easy ridesLaugh
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 19 Sep 25 14:00
Halved in price. Stable on. Good horse. Jockey wanted it alright !
By:
formoftheace
When: 19 Sep 25 14:10
Brod Wilson could have won on it tbf…
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 19 Sep 25 15:33
I didn't see the race when I posted yesterday, but have now, and something has been missed by the analysts above who criticised Marquand, and that is the horse was drawn 7/7 and when they broke he was taking a grip (which is noted in the RP form comment), so Marquand had a decision to make, either get cover or allow his mount to run keenly on the outer, and as I would expect any top jockey to do in that situation, he chose to get cover rather than allow the horse to ruin its chance by running too freely, and this enabled the horse to finish his race off, but unfortunately for his backers, the winner, from a yard which has now had three winners at the meeting and a big-priced second, kept rolling.
By:
uptheirons
When: 19 Sep 25 15:47
Agreed,George
By:
DancingBraveTheBest
When: 19 Sep 25 15:49
I agree with a lot of what you say George and yes he had a bad draw yesterday but to drop the horse as far back as he did didnt sit right with me and the market spoke volumes b4 the race Sad
By:
the dealer
When: 19 Sep 25 15:59
In fairness 4/9 looked pretty short for that debut run. The winner might be okay but there wasn't much else in the race.
It wore a hood, which is there to keep them calm, suggesting he wasn't straight forward. He was slow away and looked a big green, yesterday he still looked far from the finished article and will undoubtedly make a better 3 year old.
The going was opposite to Hamilton, the tracks are very different, stable form not the best.
Imo there was loads of reasons why it did drift and it had nothing to do with the ride.
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 19 Sep 25 15:59
I don't know if or not the colt had been keen to post, but if he had been, then that could have been a reason for the drift and influenced Marquand's decision to try and get the colt switched off asap.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com