There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
22 Aug 25
11:00
Joined:
Date Joined:
25 Dec 05
IF HE RUNS HIS RACE HE WINS
NO **** SHERLOCK
problem been if horses all run to form.their race ,there,d be no bookmakers left to bet with,
NO **** SHERLOCK
problem been if horses all run to form.their race ,there,d be no bookmakers left to bet with,
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 7
|
By:
To be fair to the guy (and I'm not a fan of his) I've regularly heard
a lot worse...such as 'whatever beats him will win' - WTF!  Yes...it's irritatingly trite but I'd suspect we've ALL used that glib phrase and it does actually make sense in the right context with certain horses - even at the highest level with 'rogue' performers. |
|
By:
“And there’s only ten lengths between first and last”. Only?! As if we all want/prefer our selection to be ten lengths last, even at an early stage.
|
|
By:
13/2 winner there
|
|
By:
Trainers and some pundits use the worst phrase 'lovely horse'
 ....if I had a quid for the times I've heard that said.... |
|
By:
Often just before the lovely horse trails in near the rear of the field
 |
|
By:
what grinds me is a regular line from lisa o neil or kev o ryan.... "always well schooled coming the _____ yard" . It cracks me up when the belt the first hurdle like they have seen one before :)
|
|
By:
I don't see a problem with the sense. He's saying that if the horse runs to the best of his ability he will beat the others, (rather than needing to improve on his best to win). If you're complaining that it's a trite and lazy platitude, then fair enough, but there are many worse examples.
|