I laid the winner in the foto fwiw, how someone is confident enough to pull the market down to 1.03 on that is far beyond me. It did drift out again after more replays.
I laid the winner in the foto fwiw, how someone is confident enough to pull the market down to 1.03 on that is far beyond me. It did drift out again after more replays.
Hardly. The market wasn't sure on reopen, I'd say 20-30 seconds in, before any decent replays on rtv, a whale instantly took it to a spread of 1.02-1.03. With over a grand on the pink side @1.03 still there. After the replays it drifted back out to a more realistic price, but obviously there's no definitive replays from this course on a close one and I'd say it should have been a 50/50 market. The camera followed the 2nd and rtv pundits were leaning toward the runner up. And they the showed the picture after the result, a few pixels in it. Very lucky for the whale.
Hardly. The market wasn't sure on reopen, I'd say 20-30 seconds in, before any decent replays on rtv, a whale instantly took it to a spread of 1.02-1.03. With over a grand on the pink side @1.03 still there. After the replays it drifted back out to a
there's no way with the angle and the margin of victory that any sane person at the track could play at those odds mitolo talking bull..no surprise there.
there's no way with the angle and the margin of victory that any sane person at the track could play at those odds mitolo talking bull..no surprise there.
coward getting brave. nothing ive ever said do you argue agasinst. if its rubbish feel free to have a go. you dont because you cant and well-named
i only said someone was on the phone. thats all. didnt say anything about what they did or whether they had a go at it
coward getting brave. nothing ive ever said do you argue agasinst. if its rubbish feel free to have a go. you dont because you cant and well-namedi only said someone was on the phone. thats all. didnt say anything about what they did or whether they
nope. i said someone was there and you are so desperate to find fault you jumped in
you must have had a few yourself as you are raging already you big whingey old tart. lets se how long you can keep it up
you should be in good form given how things are shaping for your 2 heroes, trump and putin
nope. i said someone was there and you are so desperate to find fault you jumped inyou must have had a few yourself as you are raging already you big whingey old tart. lets se how long you can keep it upyou should be in good form given how things are
i only said someone was there for a close one. no idea whether they had a go at it or decided its too risky. i doubt many would unless they had a magnifying glass as well
dont you start ricardoi only said someone was there for a close one. no idea whether they had a go at it or decided its too risky. i doubt many would unless they had a magnifying glass as well
what if there was a 4"? maybe they arent in their right mind. i dont know. my mate was there and mentioned it as some sort of warning, not knowing id never touch it regardless
stfu&froydc
you on the ironman pillswhat if there was a 4"? maybe they arent in their right mind. i dont know. my mate was there and mentioned it as some sort of warning, not knowing id never touch it regardlessstfu&froydc
A tad confusing if the photo expert i.e the OP thinks a layer wishing to lay @ 1.03 somehow makes it unusual and leaving a grand @ 1.03 constitutes a load of money, £30 liability, are things so bad on the exchange?
A tad confusing if the photo expert i.e the OP thinks a layer wishing to lay @ 1.03 somehow makes it unusual and leaving a grand @ 1.03 constitutes a load of money, £30 liability, are things so bad on the exchange?
I get that shafter, only time I have bet in a photo is for insurance and most traded probably the same but to say a load of money on the winner and then a grand left up as if it was a huge liability?
I get that shafter, only time I have bet in a photo is for insurance and most traded probably the same but to say a load of money on the winner and then a grand left up as if it was a huge liability?
Never was such a claim shafter, look up the definition of we and I and then pick 2 numbers between 1 and 600 KG to decide what is "Not very big" or Monster.
I am sure T2R could oblige with a matching pair again? LOL
Never was such a claim shafter, look up the definition of we and I and then pick 2 numbers between 1 and 600 KG to decide what is "Not very big" or Monster.I am sure T2R could oblige with a matching pair again? LOL