Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
1st time poster
24 May 25 15:45
Joined:
Date Joined: 25 Dec 05
| Topic/replies: 60,256 | Blogger: 1st time poster's blog
don't  THE SHOES defenders feel a little bit Stupid now

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 44
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 24 May 25 15:46
not at all.
By:
Whippin Piccadilly
When: 24 May 25 15:46
Was Ruling Court in the race?
By:
in hell
When: 24 May 25 15:47
Must do, but you know what it like these days. people double down as Rico is now Cry
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 24 May 25 15:48
different track,worse opposition,differing going.

#Walofs
By:
the dealer
When: 24 May 25 15:48
No but you should, what price ruling court in  that race today without the winner?
By:
wondersobright
When: 24 May 25 15:48
a similar price imo td
By:
wondersobright
When: 24 May 25 15:48
a similar price imo td
By:
the dealer
When: 24 May 25 15:51
Yes and would have won.


Never ceases to amaze me how stupid some of his posts are
By:
in hell
When: 24 May 25 15:51
As was the Craven, and yet you used that argument for the defence of the Skidmark ride. Can't have it both ways I'm afraid.

better ride and asked it a bit earlier, accept it and move on
By:
the dealer
When: 24 May 25 15:54
Move on from what? That the guineas winner is a better horse?
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 24 May 25 15:55
in hell 24 May 25 15:51 
As was the Craven, and yet you used that argument for the defence of the Skidmark ride. Can't have it both ways I'm afraid.

better ride and asked it a bit earlier, accept it and move on


he asked it in the ginnees 2 out ydc..it was outpaced till bottom of the dip.
By:
lapsy pa
When: 24 May 25 15:59
Fair point re a different day and opposition, no sign of him tapped for toe today and the ride was simple,closer to pace and no danger of any trouble.
By:
wondersobright
When: 24 May 25 15:59

May 24, 2025 -- 3:51PM, in hell wrote:


As was the Craven, and yet you used that argument for the defence of the Skidmark ride. Can't have it both ways I'm afraid. better ride and asked it a bit earlier, accept it and move on


I suggest you crawl back & watch both races again

By:
wondersobright
When: 24 May 25 16:01
2f out newmarket
2f out curragh

held up both races
By:
wondersobright
When: 24 May 25 16:03
only thing keane done better today was the horse settled better imo
nobody interested in that tho only the result & backing an 11/10 winner
By:
1st time poster
When: 24 May 25 16:03
1st reason THE SHOES defenders give
he went for his horse at same times as Buick ,one replay showed this was garbage
2nd reason
FOG iS a stayer 10 f horse didn't have the speed at newm, just blown the clock
now there's just scrambling about to find another one
it's easier just to say as shoemark admitted he had a shocker and should have pizahed up
By:
1st time poster
When: 24 May 25 16:08
anyway nice to see skybet giving 2 to 1 to those willin g to believe their own eyes at Newmarket
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 24 May 25 16:09
it was 2L down 2f out at newmarket..he asked it to quicken..it didnt till it hit the rising ground.

simples.
By:
wondersobright
When: 24 May 25 16:10
v easy to understand rico...but dealing with imbeciles
By:
Whippin Piccadilly
When: 24 May 25 16:13
1st time, do YOU honestly believe KS couldn't have won on FOG today? Me or you could have won on it putting up a stone of overweight!
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 24 May 25 16:17
Why should I feel stupid, didnt you hear the jockeys interview after the race, he held his hands up for being out of his ground and too confident. If you dont think Shoemark would have won on that Today you shouldnt be near a computer.
By:
Rico-Dangleflaps
When: 24 May 25 16:22
after the race, he held his hands up for being out of his ground

it 2L down 2f out?
By:
GLASGOWCALLING
When: 24 May 25 16:25
Well done Kieran another Cracking ride. LaughGrin
By:
CaptainCristy
When: 24 May 25 16:26
It could have won a furlong today and they’d still be saying they were right. I think this is about the only place you can find in the world where anyone thinks Ruling Court was the worthy winner.
By:
the dealer
When: 24 May 25 16:31
What a ridiculous statement CC

How do you possibly know what everyone thinks
By:
Hayden
When: 24 May 25 16:31
I'd say 99.9% of punters couldn't give a toss after they'd weighed in Captain , there's a continued debate on here for some reason on something that can't possibly be proven but only involves a handful with the same opinion so it'll get nowhere.
By:
the dealer
When: 24 May 25 16:33
100% Hayden
By:
CaptainCristy
When: 24 May 25 16:34

May 24, 2025 -- 4:31PM, the dealer wrote:


What a ridiculous statement CC How do you possibly know what everyone thinks


Well I can’t see it being argued anywhere else, most people wouldn’t even argue it, can’t understand it, some people boxed themselves into a corner after the race and are just the types who refuse to admit they are wrong.

By:
leif
When: 24 May 25 16:37
Buick gave Ruling Court the best ride, ran out a 1/2 winner, therefore it gives the horse fair claims to have been a 'worthy winner'.
By:
the dealer
When: 24 May 25 16:38
Different opinion from you so we are wrong???
By:
elisjohn
When: 24 May 25 16:39
scarthy champ beaten further in the english 2000 than he was today by field of gold , though expanded was slightly further today,   hope the let jonquil near him next time
By:
CaptainCristy
When: 24 May 25 16:47
And it ran a better time on worse ground
By:
impossible123
When: 24 May 25 16:54
The Shoe defenders do not feel stupid. Shoe made a mistake - he's admitted publicly. Everyone is entitled to that; Field of Gold was impressive today. He annihilated the field despite a wide passage throughout.

But, no Ruling Court or Shadow Of Light. Also, he's much strip-fitter. And, more is known of him now eg his acceleration is not immediate. Next stop is the St James's Palace. Let's hope he gets his ground again.
By:
leif
When: 24 May 25 17:02
And it ran a better time on worse ground

They dawdled at newmarket before kicking for home, and that's where shoemaker was caught out.
They didn't come back to him as quickly as he thought they would, and the hoss didn't have the toe to quicken up in time.
Raced to Gosden's orders most likely. Just didn't pan out.it happens.
By:
CaptainCristy
When: 24 May 25 17:04
Laughable, had nothing to race with whereas in the other race they were all out.
By:
shoodacoodadidnt
When: 24 May 25 18:23
I'm sure Shoemark would have won on it today. It doesn't change anything re: the ride at Newmarket. It was a mistake,,,, we all make them... I wouldn't want to be under the pressure they are to win a Classic! Tough stuff. He was man enough to admit. His punishment has been severe.... but good guys come back. This too shall pass.
By:
johnwayne
When: 24 May 25 18:30
totally agree
By:
1st time poster
When: 24 May 25 18:36
good guy ,s ?
he,s been sacked,been an addict,
who needs the bad guys ?
By:
elisjohn
When: 24 May 25 18:42
perhaps Gosden should take the blame, why no pacemaker at hq, same as haggis last week with al assay,
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com