Pearla - Marquand

Or maybe the best horse on the day won?

Best horse finished third DD but I understand what you're saying

The runner up has an entry in the Irish Oaks in July suggesting that connections think that she needs further in time to come.

differentdrum 02 May 25 13:30 
Nice of him to let his wife win. Best horse has finished second. I understand you may not want to give the horse a hard race, but that one wouldn't have needed that much more.

Surely you don't mean, he should have used his whip?

I was on Pearla. Sick

  WP

The Waco Kid really should have run a lot better but it didn't take long for the cistern to get back on track!

Yes, they often aren't the best of rides but the amount of times they win after being criticised is uncanny.

Exactly. A lot of the criticism is usually fair but the way the system produces with amazing regularity is something truly out of the ordinary. lol

So how long do you allow for the system to work if it's seemingly not the next ride anymore?

Did it ever have set rules ?

One race after, two races after does it really matter, it does though produce an endless supply of winning examples but I get your not a fan MJK

May 2, 2025 -- 9:20AM, the dealer wrote:

Did it ever have set rules ? One race after, two races after does it really matter, it does though produce an endless supply of winning examples but I get your not a fan MJK

How can it be a 'system' though as by law of averages every jockey rides winners. So all the shall we call it 'new' system is doing is someone trying to get back at someone criticising a jockey, even if it takes a week or whatever for said jovkey to ride another winner. The next ride after criticism fair enough that has some thought to it but this is nonsense. As for 'set rules' I can never remember anyone doing it several rides later. I thought that was the point?

Jeez really!!!

Life's far too short to get into arguments about that. If you don't see it for what it is then so be it,

Genuinely what is it though? The next time a jockey rides a winner, no matter how long it takes, have a pop at someone by saying the 'system' strikes? Thats bolix to be fair. They're gonna ride another winner at some stage. Thats a fact, not a system.

Oh dear

Sorry should have been oh dear

Back their next three rides, stop at a winner.

Currently showing a profit of 2500 pts to a 1pt stake over the last 10 years.

Anybody who believes Marquand let her win belongs in a padded cell

May 2, 2025 -- 9:51AM, GEORGE.B wrote:

Back their next three rides, stop at a winner. Currently showing a profit of 2500 pts to a 1pt stake over the last 10 years.

To be fair at least there's some thought in that, rather than hoping they win the next race purely cause you don't like a jockey getting critcised, and then when said jockey doesn't and said person can't let it go get some kind of idiotic satisfaction when the jockey eventually wins a race.

Is that to me or WP ?

although I suppose it doesn't really matter, neither me nor him criticed your mate, in fact a post above says often they aren't the best of rides but often produce a winner at the remainder of their rides that day,
It does through up an extraordinary amount of winners

If you went to get personal fine but I hardly think this is a good example

No not to you

I could bump 100's of similar threads about the subject all started by different people