Nice of him to let his wife win. Best horse has finished second. I understand you may not want to give the horse a hard race, but that one wouldn't have needed that much more.
Surely you don't mean, he should have used his whip?
One race after, two races after does it really matter, it does though produce an endless supply of winning examples but I get your not a fan MJK
May 2, 2025 -- 3:20PM, the dealer wrote:
Did it ever have set rules ? One race after, two races after does it really matter, it does though produce an endless supply of winning examples but I get your not a fan MJK
How can it be a 'system' though as by law of averages every jockey rides winners. So all the shall we call it 'new' system is doing is someone trying to get back at someone criticising a jockey, even if it takes a week or whatever for said jovkey to ride another winner. The next ride after criticism fair enough that has some thought to it but this is nonsense. As for 'set rules' I can never remember anyone doing it several rides later. I thought that was the point?
Life's far too short to get into arguments about that. If you don't see it for what it is then so be it,
Currently showing a profit of 2500 pts to a 1pt stake over the last 10 years.
May 2, 2025 -- 3:51PM, GEORGE.B wrote:
Back their next three rides, stop at a winner. Currently showing a profit of 2500 pts to a 1pt stake over the last 10 years.
To be fair at least there's some thought in that, rather than hoping they win the next race purely cause you don't like a jockey getting critcised, and then when said jockey doesn't and said person can't let it go get some kind of idiotic satisfaction when the jockey eventually wins a race.
although I suppose it doesn't really matter, neither me nor him criticed your mate, in fact a post above says often they aren't the best of rides but often produce a winner at the remainder of their rides that day,
It does through up an extraordinary amount of winners
If you went to get personal fine but I hardly think this is a good example
