There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Anyone who laid the horse won't be complaining if they laid the horse when it became blindingly obvious he wasn't going anywhere, but should have been withdrawn after being given 2 chances.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 14
|
By:
Blame the jockey, was never going to start should've jumped off it
|
|
By:
if it had been a conditional jockey, for example, and not Brian Hughes, would it have been withdrawn?
|
|
By:
the starter gave the horse far too much benefit of the doubt there imv...
if the horse looks like refusing then so be it... starter shouldn't be concerning himself with that... farcical scenes imv. |
|
By:
Jockey sat there and made no effort, 3x
|
|
By:
should have been withdrawn and i laid it but then laid the grey false starter for a place also and ened up losing. wac
the starter shouldnt concern himself with the start? walor |
|
By:
Just give a 40 and 50 bet back Corals returning bets.
Ronnie. |
|
By:
the starter shouldnt concern himself with the start? walor
------------------------------------------------------------- it's not the starters job to decide if a horse is going to refuse or not... 2 needless false starts and BOTH were the starters fault... clown. |
|
By:
agree with that hib - should have waived them off and if horse doesn't jump off not his problem.
|
|
By:
it's obvious stu...
starter gave the horse far too much time and messed the whole thing up... tough t1tty if it refuses. |
|
By:
should have told him to take it away. not fair on wagon shunters who are struggling enough without this
|
|
By:
The horse was stood out the back the 1st time, 2nd time frozen horse and frozen jockey, 3rd time frozen horse and frozen jockey
|
|
By:
jockey never moved ever.
|
|
By:
Is that Tony Dorigo commentating there?
|
|
By:
One of the best Tony
|