Jan 24, 2025 -- 4:50PM, HappyHibby wrote:
give me an example then...not that i will do it myself tbh.
You find two balancing markets where the combined book is very close to 100%, then back to win in one market and lay to lose the same amount in the other. eg you might back 0-0 correct score and lay
Jan 24, 2025 -- 5:53PM, swiftynifty wrote:
jamee, on your example you saved over a grand on charges from churning?
Much less than that Swifty. My figures were only rough.
IMO Betfair will be in favour of churning due to the liquidity it provides. If they didn't they would have reduced implied commission to 2% which would have wiped it out completely.
Jan 24, 2025 -- 6:22PM, Cardinal Scott wrote:
Big Bash T20 cricket markets have never seen such volumes.
To the positive!
Jan 24, 2025 -- 7:42PM, Rico-Dangleflaps wrote:
jamee1 24 Jan 25 18:06
Jan 24, 2025 -- 8:06PM, Rico-Dangleflaps wrote:
sew your churning £20,000 on 2.5% implied to save £25?
A bit better than that, but not far off. Plus it significantly reduces your gross profit which could come in very handy.
Jan 24, 2025 -- 8:22PM, Bellamy Road wrote:
how does it reduce gross profit?
Because you're betting into markets with a combined book% greater than 100%.
Jan 24, 2025 -- 8:47PM, Rico-Dangleflaps wrote:
i must be losing the plot...surely if you reduce your gross profit you're reducing your net profit?and which markets have a % under 100%?
Gross profit and profit after commission are both reduced. But, as long as the overround is small enough, then contribution towards EF is greater than the value of profit lost, leaving you net net better off. This is because half of implied commission is greater than half of commission.